Quotient of sum of exps

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.3%

Time: 6.1s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = 5.8946667255174104e+243
  2. b = 2.3207994541495247e+258

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.995)
   (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) 1.0))
   (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.995d0) then
        tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.995:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.995], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.994999999999999996

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   if 0.994999999999999996 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(1 + e^{-a}\right)}^{-1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.995)
   (pow (+ 1.0 (exp (- a))) -1.0)
   (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = pow((1.0 + exp(-a)), -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.995d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + exp(-a)) ** (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = Math.pow((1.0 + Math.exp(-a)), -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.995:
		tmp = math.pow((1.0 + math.exp(-a)), -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-a))) ^ -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = (1.0 + exp(-a)) ^ -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.995], N[Power[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-a)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.994999999999999996

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}}} \]

      2. clear-num N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. inv-pow N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{-1}} \]

      4. sqr-pow N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)} \cdot {\left(\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}} \]

      5. pow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]

      6. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]

      7. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left({\left(\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}\right)}}^{2} \]

      8. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}\right)}}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\frac{\color{blue}{e^{a} + e^{b}}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      10. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\frac{\color{blue}{e^{b} + e^{a}}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      11. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\frac{\color{blue}{e^{b} + e^{a}}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2}\right)}\right)}^{2} \]

      12. metadata-eval 98.6

          \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\frac{e^{b} + e^{a}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\color{blue}{-0.5}}\right)}^{2} \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(\frac{e^{b} + e^{a}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{-0.5}\right)}^{2}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 + e^{a}}{e^{a}}\right)}}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(1 + e^{a}\right)}}{e^{a}}\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      2. associate-*l/ N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{a}} \cdot \left(1 + e^{a}\right)\right)}}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      3. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{a}} \cdot 1 + \frac{1}{e^{a}} \cdot e^{a}\right)}}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      4. *-rgt-identity N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + \frac{1}{e^{a}} \cdot e^{a}\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      5. lft-mult-inverse N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\frac{1}{e^{a}} + \color{blue}{1}\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      6. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{a}} + 1\right)}}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      7. rec-exp N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(a\right)}} + 1\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      8. neg-mul-1 N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot a}} + 1\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      9. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left({\left(\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot a}} + 1\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      10. neg-mul-1 N/A

          \[\leadsto {\left({\left(e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(a\right)}} + 1\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2} \]

      11. lower-neg.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto {\left({\left(e^{\color{blue}{-a}} + 1\right)}^{-0.5}\right)}^{2} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto {\left({\color{blue}{\left(e^{-a} + 1\right)}}^{-0.5}\right)}^{2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left({\left(e^{-a} + 1\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. lift-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left({\left(e^{-a} + 1\right)}^{\frac{-1}{2}}\right)}}^{2} \]

      3. pow-pow N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(e^{-a} + 1\right)}^{\left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot 2\right)}} \]

      4. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto {\left(e^{-a} + 1\right)}^{\color{blue}{-1}} \]

      5. unpow-1 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{-a} + 1}} \]

      6. lower-/.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{-a} + 1}} \]

   9. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-a}}} \]

   if 0.994999999999999996 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(1 + e^{-a}\right)}^{-1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.995) (/ (exp a) (+ 2.0 a)) (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = exp(a) / (2.0 + a);
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.995d0) then
        tmp = exp(a) / (2.0d0 + a)
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / (2.0 + a);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.995:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / (2.0 + a)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / Float64(2.0 + a));
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = exp(a) / (2.0 + a);
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.995], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.994999999999999996

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

   if 0.994999999999999996 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.995) (/ (exp a) 2.0) (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.995d0) then
        tmp = exp(a) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.995) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.995:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.995)
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.995], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.994999999999999996

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if 0.994999999999999996 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0.995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 2.0)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (+ 2.0 a))
   (pow (* (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / (2.0 + a);
	} else {
		tmp = pow((fma(0.5, b, 1.0) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / Float64(2.0 + a));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(0.5, b, 1.0) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 2

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 76.9

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 49.5

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 49.5%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   if 2 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{{b}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 48.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 53.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(0.5 \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 2.0) (/ (+ 1.0 a) (+ 2.0 a)) (pow (* (* 0.5 b) b) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / (2.0 + a);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(((0.5 * b) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(b) <= 2.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + a) / (2.0d0 + a)
    else
        tmp = ((0.5d0 * b) * b) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(b) <= 2.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / (2.0 + a);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(((0.5 * b) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(b) <= 2.0:
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / (2.0 + a)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(((0.5 * b) * b), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / Float64(2.0 + a));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.5 * b) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0)
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / (2.0 + a);
	else
		tmp = ((0.5 * b) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 2

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 76.9

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 49.5

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 49.5%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   if 2 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot {b}^{\color{blue}{2}}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 48.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\left(0.5 \cdot b\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(0.5 \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 76.9% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 1.95e+96)
   (/ (exp a) 2.0)
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 1.95e+96) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 1.95e+96)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 1.95e+96], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 1.95e96

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 73.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if 1.95e96 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 71.0% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.6e+93)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 a 0.5) a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.6e+93) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.6e+93)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.6e+93], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * a + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.5999999999999999e93

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 73.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 44.6

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 44.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around 0

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + a}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + a \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot a\right)\right)}} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

   14. Applied rewrites 61.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   if 3.5999999999999999e93 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 67.7% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.6e+93)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.6e+93) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.6e+93)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.6e+93], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.5999999999999999e93

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 73.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 44.6

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 44.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around 0

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + a}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

   14. Applied rewrites 58.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   if 3.5999999999999999e93 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 63.2% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.6e+93)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.6e+93) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.6e+93)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.6e+93], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.5999999999999999e93

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 73.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 44.6

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 44.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around 0

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + a}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

   14. Applied rewrites 58.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   if 3.5999999999999999e93 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 69.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 53.7% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 2e-103)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (+ 2.0 a))
   (pow (fma (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2e-103) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / (2.0 + a);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 2e-103)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / Float64(2.0 + a));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2e-103], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 1.99999999999999992e-103

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 74.5

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 48.0

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 48.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{2 + a} \]

   if 1.99999999999999992e-103 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 92.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 51.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{2 + a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 39.9% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{2 + a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ 2.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (2.0 + a);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (2.0d0 + a)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (2.0 + a);
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (2.0 + a)

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(2.0 + a))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (2.0 + a);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(2.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   2. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   3. lower-exp.f64 65.1

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

5. Applied rewrites 65.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 64.2%

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a}} \]

9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2 + a} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 36.8%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2 + a} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 39.4% accurate, 315.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   3. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   4. lower-exp.f64 79.0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

5. Applied rewrites 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 36.2%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- b a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp((b - a)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((b - a)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((b - a)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(b - a))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(b - a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024318 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "Quotient of sum of exps"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (/ 1 (+ 1 (exp (- b a)))))

  (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))