Harley's example

Percentage Accurate: 90.7% → 95.6%

Time: 48.7s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 896.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. c_p = 6.519806117669224e-10
  2. c_n = 2.3795839825762444e-250
  3. t = 66247.89222368452
  4. s = -16610855329.995546

Specification

\[0 < c\_p \land 0 < c\_n\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\\ t_2 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\\ \frac{{t\_2}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - t\_2\right)}^{c\_n}}{{t\_1}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - t\_1\right)}^{c\_n}} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (c_p c_n t s)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- t))))) (t_2 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- s))))))
   (/
    (* (pow t_2 c_p) (pow (- 1.0 t_2) c_n))
    (* (pow t_1 c_p) (pow (- 1.0 t_1) c_n)))))

C

double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-t));
	double t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-s));
	return (pow(t_2, c_p) * pow((1.0 - t_2), c_n)) / (pow(t_1, c_p) * pow((1.0 - t_1), c_n));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_p
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_n
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: s
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(-t))
    t_2 = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(-s))
    code = ((t_2 ** c_p) * ((1.0d0 - t_2) ** c_n)) / ((t_1 ** c_p) * ((1.0d0 - t_1) ** c_n))
end function

Java

public static double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(-t));
	double t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(-s));
	return (Math.pow(t_2, c_p) * Math.pow((1.0 - t_2), c_n)) / (Math.pow(t_1, c_p) * Math.pow((1.0 - t_1), c_n));
}

Python

def code(c_p, c_n, t, s):
	t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(-t))
	t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(-s))
	return (math.pow(t_2, c_p) * math.pow((1.0 - t_2), c_n)) / (math.pow(t_1, c_p) * math.pow((1.0 - t_1), c_n))

Julia

function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	t_1 = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-t))))
	t_2 = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-s))))
	return Float64(Float64((t_2 ^ c_p) * (Float64(1.0 - t_2) ^ c_n)) / Float64((t_1 ^ c_p) * (Float64(1.0 - t_1) ^ c_n)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-t));
	t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-s));
	tmp = ((t_2 ^ c_p) * ((1.0 - t_2) ^ c_n)) / ((t_1 ^ c_p) * ((1.0 - t_1) ^ c_n));
end

Wolfram

code[c$95$p_, c$95$n_, t_, s_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-t)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-s)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[Power[t$95$2, c$95$p], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(1.0 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Power[t$95$1, c$95$p], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(1.0 - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Initial Program: 90.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\\ t_2 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\\ \frac{{t\_2}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - t\_2\right)}^{c\_n}}{{t\_1}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - t\_1\right)}^{c\_n}} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (c_p c_n t s)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- t))))) (t_2 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- s))))))
   (/
    (* (pow t_2 c_p) (pow (- 1.0 t_2) c_n))
    (* (pow t_1 c_p) (pow (- 1.0 t_1) c_n)))))

C

double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-t));
	double t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-s));
	return (pow(t_2, c_p) * pow((1.0 - t_2), c_n)) / (pow(t_1, c_p) * pow((1.0 - t_1), c_n));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_p
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_n
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: s
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(-t))
    t_2 = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(-s))
    code = ((t_2 ** c_p) * ((1.0d0 - t_2) ** c_n)) / ((t_1 ** c_p) * ((1.0d0 - t_1) ** c_n))
end function

Java

public static double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(-t));
	double t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(-s));
	return (Math.pow(t_2, c_p) * Math.pow((1.0 - t_2), c_n)) / (Math.pow(t_1, c_p) * Math.pow((1.0 - t_1), c_n));
}

Python

def code(c_p, c_n, t, s):
	t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(-t))
	t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(-s))
	return (math.pow(t_2, c_p) * math.pow((1.0 - t_2), c_n)) / (math.pow(t_1, c_p) * math.pow((1.0 - t_1), c_n))

Julia

function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	t_1 = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-t))))
	t_2 = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-s))))
	return Float64(Float64((t_2 ^ c_p) * (Float64(1.0 - t_2) ^ c_n)) / Float64((t_1 ^ c_p) * (Float64(1.0 - t_1) ^ c_n)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	t_1 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-t));
	t_2 = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-s));
	tmp = ((t_2 ^ c_p) * ((1.0 - t_2) ^ c_n)) / ((t_1 ^ c_p) * ((1.0 - t_1) ^ c_n));
end

Wolfram

code[c$95$p_, c$95$n_, t_, s_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-t)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-s)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[Power[t$95$2, c$95$p], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(1.0 - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Power[t$95$1, c$95$p], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(1.0 - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Alternative 1: 95.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := e^{-s} + 1\\ \mathbf{if}\;-s \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{\left(1 - {t\_1}^{-1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - {\left(e^{-t} + 1\right)}^{-1}\right)}^{c\_n}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(t\_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\left(-c\_p\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (c_p c_n t s)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (exp (- s)) 1.0)))
   (if (<= (- s) -1e-286)
     (/
      (pow (- 1.0 (pow t_1 -1.0)) c_n)
      (pow (- 1.0 (pow (+ (exp (- t)) 1.0) -1.0)) c_n))
     (pow (* t_1 0.5) (- c_p)))))

C

double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double t_1 = exp(-s) + 1.0;
	double tmp;
	if (-s <= -1e-286) {
		tmp = pow((1.0 - pow(t_1, -1.0)), c_n) / pow((1.0 - pow((exp(-t) + 1.0), -1.0)), c_n);
	} else {
		tmp = pow((t_1 * 0.5), -c_p);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_p
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_n
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: s
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = exp(-s) + 1.0d0
    if (-s <= (-1d-286)) then
        tmp = ((1.0d0 - (t_1 ** (-1.0d0))) ** c_n) / ((1.0d0 - ((exp(-t) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0))) ** c_n)
    else
        tmp = (t_1 * 0.5d0) ** -c_p
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double t_1 = Math.exp(-s) + 1.0;
	double tmp;
	if (-s <= -1e-286) {
		tmp = Math.pow((1.0 - Math.pow(t_1, -1.0)), c_n) / Math.pow((1.0 - Math.pow((Math.exp(-t) + 1.0), -1.0)), c_n);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((t_1 * 0.5), -c_p);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(c_p, c_n, t, s):
	t_1 = math.exp(-s) + 1.0
	tmp = 0
	if -s <= -1e-286:
		tmp = math.pow((1.0 - math.pow(t_1, -1.0)), c_n) / math.pow((1.0 - math.pow((math.exp(-t) + 1.0), -1.0)), c_n)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((t_1 * 0.5), -c_p)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	t_1 = Float64(exp(Float64(-s)) + 1.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-s) <= -1e-286)
		tmp = Float64((Float64(1.0 - (t_1 ^ -1.0)) ^ c_n) / (Float64(1.0 - (Float64(exp(Float64(-t)) + 1.0) ^ -1.0)) ^ c_n));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 * 0.5) ^ Float64(-c_p);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	t_1 = exp(-s) + 1.0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (-s <= -1e-286)
		tmp = ((1.0 - (t_1 ^ -1.0)) ^ c_n) / ((1.0 - ((exp(-t) + 1.0) ^ -1.0)) ^ c_n);
	else
		tmp = (t_1 * 0.5) ^ -c_p;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[c$95$p_, c$95$n_, t_, s_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Exp[(-s)], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[(-s), -1e-286], N[(N[Power[N[(1.0 - N[Power[t$95$1, -1.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[N[(1.0 - N[Power[N[(N[Exp[(-t)], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(t$95$1 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], (-c$95$p)], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (neg.f64 s) < -1.00000000000000005e-286

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c_p around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]

      2. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      3. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      4. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      6. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      7. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      8. lower-neg.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-s}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      9. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{\color{blue}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e-286 < (neg.f64 s)

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c_n around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

      2. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      5. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      6. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      7. lower-neg.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-s}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      8. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

      9. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}} \]

      10. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      11. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      12. lower-exp.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      13. lower-neg.f64 96.4

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-t}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\frac{1}{2}}^{c\_p}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{0.5}^{c\_p}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

   10. Applied rewrites 97.1%

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(e^{-s} + 1\right)}^{\left(-1 \cdot c\_p\right)}}{{\color{blue}{0.5}}^{c\_p}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

   12. Applied rewrites 97.8%

       \[\leadsto {\left(\left(e^{-s} + 1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(-c\_p\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-s \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-286}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{\left(1 - {\left(e^{-s} + 1\right)}^{-1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - {\left(e^{-t} + 1\right)}^{-1}\right)}^{c\_n}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(e^{-s} + 1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\left(-c\_p\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.7% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{0.5}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - {\left(e^{-t} + 1\right)}^{-1}\right)}^{c\_n}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(e^{-s} + 1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\left(-c\_p\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (c_p c_n t s)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -1e-38)
   (/ (pow 0.5 c_n) (pow (- 1.0 (pow (+ (exp (- t)) 1.0) -1.0)) c_n))
   (pow (* (+ (exp (- s)) 1.0) 0.5) (- c_p))))

C

double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1e-38) {
		tmp = pow(0.5, c_n) / pow((1.0 - pow((exp(-t) + 1.0), -1.0)), c_n);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(((exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5), -c_p);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_p
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_n
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: s
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-1d-38)) then
        tmp = (0.5d0 ** c_n) / ((1.0d0 - ((exp(-t) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0))) ** c_n)
    else
        tmp = ((exp(-s) + 1.0d0) * 0.5d0) ** -c_p
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1e-38) {
		tmp = Math.pow(0.5, c_n) / Math.pow((1.0 - Math.pow((Math.exp(-t) + 1.0), -1.0)), c_n);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(((Math.exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5), -c_p);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(c_p, c_n, t, s):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -1e-38:
		tmp = math.pow(0.5, c_n) / math.pow((1.0 - math.pow((math.exp(-t) + 1.0), -1.0)), c_n)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(((math.exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5), -c_p)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -1e-38)
		tmp = Float64((0.5 ^ c_n) / (Float64(1.0 - (Float64(exp(Float64(-t)) + 1.0) ^ -1.0)) ^ c_n));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(-s)) + 1.0) * 0.5) ^ Float64(-c_p);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -1e-38)
		tmp = (0.5 ^ c_n) / ((1.0 - ((exp(-t) + 1.0) ^ -1.0)) ^ c_n);
	else
		tmp = ((exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5) ^ -c_p;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[c$95$p_, c$95$n_, t_, s_] := If[LessEqual[t, -1e-38], N[(N[Power[0.5, c$95$n], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[N[(1.0 - N[Power[N[(N[Exp[(-t)], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[Exp[(-s)], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], (-c$95$p)], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -9.9999999999999996e-39

   1. Initial program 65.9%

      \[\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c_p around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]

      2. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      3. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      4. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      6. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      7. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      8. lower-neg.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-s}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]

      9. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{\color{blue}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}^{c\_n}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in s around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\frac{1}{2}}^{c\_n}}{{\color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}}^{c\_n}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{0.5}^{c\_n}}{{\color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}}^{c\_n}} \]

   if -9.9999999999999996e-39 < t

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c_n around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

      2. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      5. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      6. lower-exp.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      7. lower-neg.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-s}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      8. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

      9. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}} \]

      10. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      11. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      12. lower-exp.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

      13. lower-neg.f64 97.5

          \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-t}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\frac{1}{2}}^{c\_p}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{0.5}^{c\_p}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

   10. Applied rewrites 97.5%

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(e^{-s} + 1\right)}^{\left(-1 \cdot c\_p\right)}}{{\color{blue}{0.5}}^{c\_p}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

   12. Applied rewrites 97.9%

       \[\leadsto {\left(\left(e^{-s} + 1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(-c\_p\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{0.5}^{c\_n}}{{\left(1 - {\left(e^{-t} + 1\right)}^{-1}\right)}^{c\_n}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(e^{-s} + 1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\left(-c\_p\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.6% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(\left(e^{-s} + 1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\left(-c\_p\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (c_p c_n t s)
 :precision binary64
 (pow (* (+ (exp (- s)) 1.0) 0.5) (- c_p)))

C

double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	return pow(((exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5), -c_p);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_p
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_n
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: s
    code = ((exp(-s) + 1.0d0) * 0.5d0) ** -c_p
end function

Java

public static double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	return Math.pow(((Math.exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5), -c_p);
}

Python

def code(c_p, c_n, t, s):
	return math.pow(((math.exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5), -c_p)

Julia

function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	return Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(-s)) + 1.0) * 0.5) ^ Float64(-c_p)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	tmp = ((exp(-s) + 1.0) * 0.5) ^ -c_p;
end

Wolfram

code[c$95$p_, c$95$n_, t_, s_] := N[Power[N[(N[(N[Exp[(-s)], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], (-c$95$p)], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.8%

   \[\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in c_n around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

   2. lower-pow.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   3. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   4. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   5. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   6. lower-exp.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   7. lower-neg.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-s}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   8. lower-pow.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

   9. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}} \]

   10. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   11. lower-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   12. lower-exp.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   13. lower-neg.f64 94.6

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-t}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 94.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\frac{1}{2}}^{c\_p}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{0.5}^{c\_p}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

10. Applied rewrites 95.6%

    \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(e^{-s} + 1\right)}^{\left(-1 \cdot c\_p\right)}}{{\color{blue}{0.5}}^{c\_p}} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

12. Applied rewrites 96.0%

    \[\leadsto {\left(\left(e^{-s} + 1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(-c\_p\right)}} \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 94.0% accurate, 896.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (c_p c_n t s) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_p
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_n
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: s
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(c_p, c_n, t, s):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[c$95$p_, c$95$n_, t_, s_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.8%

   \[\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_n}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(1 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{-t}}\right)}^{c\_n}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in c_n around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

   2. lower-pow.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   3. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   4. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   5. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   6. lower-exp.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(s\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   7. lower-neg.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-s}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   8. lower-pow.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

   9. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}}\right)}}^{c\_p}} \]

   10. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   11. lower-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)} + 1}}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   12. lower-exp.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

   13. lower-neg.f64 94.6

       \[\leadsto \frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\color{blue}{-t}} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 94.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-s} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}{{\left(\frac{1}{e^{-t} + 1}\right)}^{c\_p}}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in c_p around 0

   \[\leadsto 1 \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 95.6%

   \[\leadsto 1 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 96.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(\frac{1 + e^{-t}}{1 + e^{-s}}\right)}^{c\_p} \cdot {\left(\frac{1 + e^{t}}{1 + e^{s}}\right)}^{c\_n} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (c_p c_n t s)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (pow (/ (+ 1.0 (exp (- t))) (+ 1.0 (exp (- s)))) c_p)
  (pow (/ (+ 1.0 (exp t)) (+ 1.0 (exp s))) c_n)))

C

double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	return pow(((1.0 + exp(-t)) / (1.0 + exp(-s))), c_p) * pow(((1.0 + exp(t)) / (1.0 + exp(s))), c_n);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_p
    real(8), intent (in) :: c_n
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: s
    code = (((1.0d0 + exp(-t)) / (1.0d0 + exp(-s))) ** c_p) * (((1.0d0 + exp(t)) / (1.0d0 + exp(s))) ** c_n)
end function

Java

public static double code(double c_p, double c_n, double t, double s) {
	return Math.pow(((1.0 + Math.exp(-t)) / (1.0 + Math.exp(-s))), c_p) * Math.pow(((1.0 + Math.exp(t)) / (1.0 + Math.exp(s))), c_n);
}

Python

def code(c_p, c_n, t, s):
	return math.pow(((1.0 + math.exp(-t)) / (1.0 + math.exp(-s))), c_p) * math.pow(((1.0 + math.exp(t)) / (1.0 + math.exp(s))), c_n)

Julia

function code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	return Float64((Float64(Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-t))) / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-s)))) ^ c_p) * (Float64(Float64(1.0 + exp(t)) / Float64(1.0 + exp(s))) ^ c_n))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(c_p, c_n, t, s)
	tmp = (((1.0 + exp(-t)) / (1.0 + exp(-s))) ^ c_p) * (((1.0 + exp(t)) / (1.0 + exp(s))) ^ c_n);
end

Wolfram

code[c$95$p_, c$95$n_, t_, s_] := N[(N[Power[N[(N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-t)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-s)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], c$95$p], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(N[(1.0 + N[Exp[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[s], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], c$95$n], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024318 
(FPCore (c_p c_n t s)
  :name "Harley's example"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (< 0.0 c_p) (< 0.0 c_n))

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* (pow (/ (+ 1 (exp (- t))) (+ 1 (exp (- s)))) c_p) (pow (/ (+ 1 (exp t)) (+ 1 (exp s))) c_n)))

  (/ (* (pow (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- s)))) c_p) (pow (- 1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- s))))) c_n)) (* (pow (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- t)))) c_p) (pow (- 1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- t))))) c_n))))