Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.6% → 97.6%

Time: 6.9s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.3×

• 40.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.6% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z t (fma y x (fma i c (* b a)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(z, t, fma(y, x, fma(i, c, (b * a))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(z, t, fma(y, x, fma(i, c, Float64(b * a))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(z * t + N[(y * x + N[(i * c + N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.5%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   3. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

   4. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   5. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   7. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   9. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   10. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i + a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

   13. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   14. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 96.5

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

   16. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. lower-*.f64 96.5

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 96.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 42.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -0.2:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-143}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -5e+114)
   (* i c)
   (if (<= (* c i) -0.2)
     (* t z)
     (if (<= (* c i) -2e-80)
       (* b a)
       (if (<= (* c i) -1e-246)
         (* y x)
         (if (<= (* c i) 2e-143)
           (* t z)
           (if (<= (* c i) 5e+137) (* y x) (* i c))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+114) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2e-80) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -1e-246) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e-143) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 5e+137) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-5d+114)) then
        tmp = i * c
    else if ((c * i) <= (-0.2d0)) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((c * i) <= (-2d-80)) then
        tmp = b * a
    else if ((c * i) <= (-1d-246)) then
        tmp = y * x
    else if ((c * i) <= 2d-143) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((c * i) <= 5d+137) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = i * c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+114) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -0.2) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -2e-80) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else if ((c * i) <= -1e-246) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e-143) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((c * i) <= 5e+137) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -5e+114:
		tmp = i * c
	elif (c * i) <= -0.2:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (c * i) <= -2e-80:
		tmp = b * a
	elif (c * i) <= -1e-246:
		tmp = y * x
	elif (c * i) <= 2e-143:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (c * i) <= 5e+137:
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = i * c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -5e+114)
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -0.2)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -2e-80)
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= -1e-246)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2e-143)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 5e+137)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -5e+114)
		tmp = i * c;
	elseif ((c * i) <= -0.2)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((c * i) <= -2e-80)
		tmp = b * a;
	elseif ((c * i) <= -1e-246)
		tmp = y * x;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 2e-143)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((c * i) <= 5e+137)
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = i * c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -5e+114], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -0.2], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -2e-80], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e-246], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2e-143], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 5e+137], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -5.0000000000000001e114 or 5.0000000000000002e137 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 88.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 65.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   if -5.0000000000000001e114 < (*.f64 c i) < -0.20000000000000001 or -9.99999999999999956e-247 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.9999999999999999e-143

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 74.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 29.0%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]

   12. Taylor expanded in z around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-*.f64 46.6

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 46.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -0.20000000000000001 < (*.f64 c i) < -1.99999999999999992e-80

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 84.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 70.6%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]

   if -1.99999999999999992e-80 < (*.f64 c i) < -9.99999999999999956e-247 or 1.9999999999999999e-143 < (*.f64 c i) < 5.0000000000000002e137

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 55.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 44.4

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 44.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+141}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -1e+94) (not (<= (* z t) 5e+141)))
   (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))
   (fma b a (fma i c (* y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -1e+94) || !((z * t) <= 5e+141)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (y * x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -1e+94) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 5e+141))
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(y * x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -1e+94], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 5e+141]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -1e94 or 5.00000000000000025e141 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 90.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 86.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -1e94 < (*.f64 z t) < 5.00000000000000025e141

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 93.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+141}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z t) -1e+94)
   (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))
   (if (<= (* z t) 1e+103)
     (fma b a (fma i c (* y x)))
     (fma i c (fma t z (* y x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -1e+94) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1e+103) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, (y * x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * t) <= -1e+94)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 1e+103)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, Float64(y * x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -1e+94], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 1e+103], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c + N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -1e94

   1. Initial program 93.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 86.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -1e94 < (*.f64 z t) < 1e103

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 94.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   if 1e103 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 87.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 85.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+211}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, b \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+244}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+211)
   (fma y x (* b a))
   (if (<= (* x y) 2e+244) (fma b a (fma i c (* t z))) (fma b a (* y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+211) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, (b * a));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+244) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (y * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+211)
		tmp = fma(y, x, Float64(b * a));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+244)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(y * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+211], N[(y * x + N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+244], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.9999999999999996e210

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 90.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 11.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 90.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, \color{blue}{a}, y \cdot x\right) \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

   13. Applied rewrites 91.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, b \cdot a\right) \]

   if -9.9999999999999996e210 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.00000000000000015e244

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 88.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.00000000000000015e244 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 89.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 22.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 85.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, \color{blue}{a}, y \cdot x\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 42.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-274}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z t) -5e+63)
   (* t z)
   (if (<= (* z t) 4e-274) (* i c) (if (<= (* z t) 1e+103) (* b a) (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -5e+63) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 4e-274) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1e+103) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * t) <= (-5d+63)) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((z * t) <= 4d-274) then
        tmp = i * c
    else if ((z * t) <= 1d+103) then
        tmp = b * a
    else
        tmp = t * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -5e+63) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 4e-274) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1e+103) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * t) <= -5e+63:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (z * t) <= 4e-274:
		tmp = i * c
	elif (z * t) <= 1e+103:
		tmp = b * a
	else:
		tmp = t * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * t) <= -5e+63)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 4e-274)
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 1e+103)
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * t) <= -5e+63)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((z * t) <= 4e-274)
		tmp = i * c;
	elseif ((z * t) <= 1e+103)
		tmp = b * a;
	else
		tmp = t * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -5e+63], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 4e-274], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 1e+103], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -5.00000000000000011e63 or 1e103 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 83.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 17.0%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]

   12. Taylor expanded in z around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-*.f64 62.9

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 62.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -5.00000000000000011e63 < (*.f64 z t) < 3.99999999999999986e-274

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 43.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 43.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   if 3.99999999999999986e-274 < (*.f64 z t) < 1e103

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 72.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 36.1%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 67.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 10^{+18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -2e+141) (not (<= (* a b) 1e+18)))
   (fma a b (* t z))
   (fma i c (* y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -2e+141) || !((a * b) <= 1e+18)) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(i, c, (y * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -2e+141) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 1e+18))
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = fma(i, c, Float64(y * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+141], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+18]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000003e141 or 1e18 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 86.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   if -2.00000000000000003e141 < (*.f64 a b) < 1e18

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 73.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 41.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 40.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, \color{blue}{a}, y \cdot x\right) \]

   12. Taylor expanded in a around 0

       \[\leadsto c \cdot i + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

   14. Applied rewrites 68.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, \color{blue}{c}, y \cdot x\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 10^{+18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 67.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -1e+94) (not (<= (* z t) 5e+142)))
   (fma a b (* t z))
   (fma b a (* y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -1e+94) || !((z * t) <= 5e+142)) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (y * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -1e+94) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 5e+142))
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(y * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -1e+94], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 5e+142]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -1e94 or 5.0000000000000001e142 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 86.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   if -1e94 < (*.f64 z t) < 5.0000000000000001e142

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 92.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 60.4%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, \color{blue}{a}, y \cdot x\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+142}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 62.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+169} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+282}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2e+169) (not (<= (* x y) 5e+282)))
   (* y x)
   (fma a b (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+169) || !((x * y) <= 5e+282)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+169) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 5e+282))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+169], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+282]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.99999999999999987e169 or 4.99999999999999978e282 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 89.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 29.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 29.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 20.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 78.2

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 78.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.99999999999999987e169 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.99999999999999978e282

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 89.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 59.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+169} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+282}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 43.0% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+159}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -2e+141) (not (<= (* a b) 4e+159))) (* b a) (* i c)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -2e+141) || !((a * b) <= 4e+159)) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-2d+141)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 4d+159))) then
        tmp = b * a
    else
        tmp = i * c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -2e+141) || !((a * b) <= 4e+159)) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+141) or not ((a * b) <= 4e+159):
		tmp = b * a
	else:
		tmp = i * c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -2e+141) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 4e+159))
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -2e+141) || ~(((a * b) <= 4e+159)))
		tmp = b * a;
	else
		tmp = i * c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+141], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4e+159]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -2.00000000000000003e141 or 3.9999999999999997e159 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 88.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 61.6%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]

   if -2.00000000000000003e141 < (*.f64 a b) < 3.9999999999999997e159

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 35.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 35.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+159}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 27.8% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ b \cdot a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* b a))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return b * a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = b * a
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return b * a;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return b * a

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(b * a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = b * a;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.5%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. lower-*.f64 75.2

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 75.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 50.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 25.2%

    \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024318 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))