Statistics.Distribution.Poisson:$clogProbability from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.3s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -31500000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, -y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -31500000.0) (not (<= z 2.45e+74)))
   (- (- z) y)
   (fma (log y) x (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -31500000.0) || !(z <= 2.45e+74)) {
		tmp = -z - y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(log(y), x, -y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -31500000.0) || !(z <= 2.45e+74))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - y);
	else
		tmp = fma(log(y), x, Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -31500000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.45e+74]], $MachinePrecision]], N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * x + (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.15e7 or 2.44999999999999995e74 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} - y \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - y \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 91.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

   if -3.15e7 < z < 2.44999999999999995e74

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)} \]

      4. lower-log.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\log y}, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 89.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, \color{blue}{-y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, -y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -31500000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, -y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 78.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+128} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+203}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\log y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4e+128) (not (<= x 6.4e+203))) (* (log y) x) (- (- z) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4e+128) || !(x <= 6.4e+203)) {
		tmp = log(y) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4d+128)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.4d+203))) then
        tmp = log(y) * x
    else
        tmp = -z - y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4e+128) || !(x <= 6.4e+203)) {
		tmp = Math.log(y) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4e+128) or not (x <= 6.4e+203):
		tmp = math.log(y) * x
	else:
		tmp = -z - y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4e+128) || !(x <= 6.4e+203))
		tmp = Float64(log(y) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4e+128) || ~((x <= 6.4e+203)))
		tmp = log(y) * x;
	else
		tmp = -z - y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4e+128], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.4e+203]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.0000000000000003e128 or 6.3999999999999994e203 < x

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)} \]

      4. lower-log.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\log y}, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 93.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, \color{blue}{-y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x, -y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log y + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{x}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y - \frac{y}{x}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \log y \cdot x \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 85.6%

       \[\leadsto \log y \cdot x \]

   if -4.0000000000000003e128 < x < 6.3999999999999994e203

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} - y \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - y \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 80.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+128} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+203}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\log y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 66.5% accurate, 18.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(-z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} - y \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - y \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 69.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

5. Applied rewrites 69.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 34.4% accurate, 37.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-y)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)} \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 38.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 38.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 2.2% accurate, 112.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)} \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 38.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 38.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 17.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{0 - y \cdot y}{\color{blue}{0 + y}} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

9. Applied rewrites 2.2%

   \[\leadsto y \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024318 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Poisson:$clogProbability from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))