Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.9% → 98.1%

Time: 6.7s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.3×

• 41.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma z t (fma y x (fma i c (* b a)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(z, t, fma(y, x, fma(i, c, (b * a))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(z, t, fma(y, x, fma(i, c, Float64(b * a))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(z * t + N[(y * x + N[(i * c + N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   3. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)} \]

   4. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   5. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   7. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   9. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   10. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, a \cdot b + c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i + a \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

   13. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{c \cdot i} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   14. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + a \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 97.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

   16. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{a \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. lower-*.f64 97.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}\right)\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, b \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 43.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+150}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-72}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+71}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z t) -5e+150)
   (* t z)
   (if (<= (* z t) -3e-72)
     (* i c)
     (if (<= (* z t) 1e-61)
       (* b a)
       (if (<= (* z t) 1.6e+71) (* i c) (* t z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -5e+150) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((z * t) <= -3e-72) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1e-61) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1.6e+71) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * t) <= (-5d+150)) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((z * t) <= (-3d-72)) then
        tmp = i * c
    else if ((z * t) <= 1d-61) then
        tmp = b * a
    else if ((z * t) <= 1.6d+71) then
        tmp = i * c
    else
        tmp = t * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -5e+150) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((z * t) <= -3e-72) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1e-61) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1.6e+71) {
		tmp = i * c;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * t) <= -5e+150:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (z * t) <= -3e-72:
		tmp = i * c
	elif (z * t) <= 1e-61:
		tmp = b * a
	elif (z * t) <= 1.6e+71:
		tmp = i * c
	else:
		tmp = t * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * t) <= -5e+150)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= -3e-72)
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 1e-61)
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 1.6e+71)
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * t) <= -5e+150)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((z * t) <= -3e-72)
		tmp = i * c;
	elseif ((z * t) <= 1e-61)
		tmp = b * a;
	elseif ((z * t) <= 1.6e+71)
		tmp = i * c;
	else
		tmp = t * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -5e+150], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -3e-72], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 1e-61], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 1.6e+71], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -5.00000000000000009e150 or 1.60000000000000012e71 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 88.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 87.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 17.4%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]

   12. Taylor expanded in z around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-*.f64 72.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 72.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -5.00000000000000009e150 < (*.f64 z t) < -3e-72 or 1e-61 < (*.f64 z t) < 1.60000000000000012e71

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 42.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   if -3e-72 < (*.f64 z t) < 1e-61

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 65.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 43.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 42.3%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 62.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -5e+132)
   (* y x)
   (if (<= (* x y) -1e-263)
     (fma b a (* c i))
     (if (<= (* x y) 2e+146) (fma a b (* t z)) (* y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+132) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -1e-263) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (c * i));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+146) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -5e+132)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -1e-263)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(c * i));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+146)
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+132], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e-263], N[(b * a + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+146], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.0000000000000001e132 or 1.99999999999999987e146 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 30.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 30.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 22.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 76.5

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 76.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -5.0000000000000001e132 < (*.f64 x y) < -1e-263

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 76.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]

   if -1e-263 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.99999999999999987e146

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 91.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+70}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* z t) -2e+70) (not (<= (* z t) 2e+70)))
   (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))
   (fma b a (fma i c (* y x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((z * t) <= -2e+70) || !((z * t) <= 2e+70)) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (y * x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(z * t) <= -2e+70) || !(Float64(z * t) <= 2e+70))
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(y * x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -2e+70], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 2e+70]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -2.00000000000000015e70 or 2.00000000000000015e70 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 88.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000015e70 < (*.f64 z t) < 2.00000000000000015e70

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 94.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70} \lor \neg \left(z \cdot t \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+70}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 83.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+230}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -5e+132) (not (<= (* x y) 4e+230)))
   (* y x)
   (fma b a (fma i c (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+132) || !((x * y) <= 4e+230)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5e+132) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 4e+230))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+132], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 4e+230]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.0000000000000001e132 or 4.0000000000000004e230 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 88.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 26.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 26.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 20.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 80.7

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 80.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -5.0000000000000001e132 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.0000000000000004e230

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 89.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+230}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 89.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+26}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z t) -1e+26)
   (fma i c (fma t z (* y x)))
   (if (<= (* z t) 2e+70)
     (fma b a (fma i c (* y x)))
     (fma b a (fma i c (* t z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -1e+26) {
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, (y * x)));
	} else if ((z * t) <= 2e+70) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (y * x)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, (t * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * t) <= -1e+26)
		tmp = fma(i, c, fma(t, z, Float64(y * x)));
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 2e+70)
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, fma(i, c, Float64(t * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -1e+26], N[(i * c + N[(t * z + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 2e+70], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -1.00000000000000005e26

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 91.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000005e26 < (*.f64 z t) < 2.00000000000000015e70

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 95.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.00000000000000015e70 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 86.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 63.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+146}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -5e+132) (not (<= (* x y) 2e+146)))
   (* y x)
   (fma a b (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+132) || !((x * y) <= 2e+146)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5e+132) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 2e+146))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+132], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+146]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.0000000000000001e132 or 1.99999999999999987e146 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 87.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 30.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 30.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 22.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 76.5

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 76.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -5.0000000000000001e132 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.99999999999999987e146

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 90.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 63.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+132} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+146}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 66.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+71}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z t) -2e+22)
   (fma i c (* t z))
   (if (<= (* z t) 1.6e+71) (fma b a (* c i)) (fma a b (* t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -2e+22) {
		tmp = fma(i, c, (t * z));
	} else if ((z * t) <= 1.6e+71) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (t * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * t) <= -2e+22)
		tmp = fma(i, c, Float64(t * z));
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 1.6e+71)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(c * i));
	else
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -2e+22], N[(i * c + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 1.6e+71], N[(b * a + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -2e22

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 91.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right) \]

   if -2e22 < (*.f64 z t) < 1.60000000000000012e71

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 95.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i\right) \]

   if 1.60000000000000012e71 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 88.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 86.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 43.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+115} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 10^{+95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* a b) -5e+115) (not (<= (* a b) 1e+95))) (* b a) (* i c)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+115) || !((a * b) <= 1e+95)) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((a * b) <= (-5d+115)) .or. (.not. ((a * b) <= 1d+95))) then
        tmp = b * a
    else
        tmp = i * c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+115) || !((a * b) <= 1e+95)) {
		tmp = b * a;
	} else {
		tmp = i * c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((a * b) <= -5e+115) or not ((a * b) <= 1e+95):
		tmp = b * a
	else:
		tmp = i * c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(a * b) <= -5e+115) || !(Float64(a * b) <= 1e+95))
		tmp = Float64(b * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(i * c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((a * b) <= -5e+115) || ~(((a * b) <= 1e+95)))
		tmp = b * a;
	else
		tmp = i * c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -5e+115], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 1e+95]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(i * c), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -5.00000000000000008e115 or 1.00000000000000002e95 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 87.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 83.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 68.4%

       \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]

   if -5.00000000000000008e115 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.00000000000000002e95

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 35.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 35.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot c} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+115} \lor \neg \left(a \cdot b \leq 10^{+95}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 27.4% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ b \cdot a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* b a))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return b * a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = b * a
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return b * a;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return b * a

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(b * a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = b * a;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + \left(c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right) \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, c \cdot i + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{i \cdot c} + t \cdot z\right) \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. lower-*.f64 75.1

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 75.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \mathsf{fma}\left(i, c, t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 52.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b}, t \cdot z\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 29.6%

    \[\leadsto b \cdot a \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024317 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))