Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 98.9%

Time: 5.6s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.2×

• 21.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(-x, z, x\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z y (fma (- x) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, y, fma(-x, z, x));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, y, fma(Float64(-x), z, x))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * y + N[((-x) * z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} + x \]

   5. lift--.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} + x \]

   6. sub-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   7. distribute-lft-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   8. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) + x\right)} \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot z} + x\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot z + x\right)} \]

   11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right), z, x\right)}\right) \]

   12. lower-neg.f64 100.0

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-x}, z, x\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(-x, z, x\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 82.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.5e+16) (not (<= z 5.1e-135))) (* z (- y x)) (* (- 1.0 z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.5e+16) || !(z <= 5.1e-135)) {
		tmp = z * (y - x);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4.5d+16)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.1d-135))) then
        tmp = z * (y - x)
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.5e+16) || !(z <= 5.1e-135)) {
		tmp = z * (y - x);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4.5e+16) or not (z <= 5.1e-135):
		tmp = z * (y - x)
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.5e+16) || !(z <= 5.1e-135))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y - x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4.5e+16) || ~((z <= 5.1e-135)))
		tmp = z * (y - x);
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.5e+16], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.1e-135]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.5e16 or 5.1000000000000001e-135 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} + x \]

      5. lift--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} + x \]

      6. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      7. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      8. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(z \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) + x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot y + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot z} + x\right) \]

      10. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right) \cdot z + x\right)} \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right), z, x\right)}\right) \]

      12. lower-neg.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-x}, z, x\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(-x, z, x\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot x\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 90.4

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]

   if -4.5e16 < z < 5.1000000000000001e-135

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      4. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. lower--.f64 68.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 68.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{+16} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.000335 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-x, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.000335) (not (<= y 9.2e+39))) (* z y) (fma (- x) z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.000335) || !(y <= 9.2e+39)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-x, z, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.000335) || !(y <= 9.2e+39))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(-x), z, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.000335], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 9.2e+39]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[((-x) * z + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.3500000000000001e-4 or 9.20000000000000047e39 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 71.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.3500000000000001e-4 < y < 9.20000000000000047e39

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      4. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. lower--.f64 81.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-x, \color{blue}{z}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.000335 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-x, z, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 74.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.000335 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.000335) (not (<= y 9.2e+39))) (* z y) (* (- 1.0 z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.000335) || !(y <= 9.2e+39)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-0.000335d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 9.2d+39))) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.000335) || !(y <= 9.2e+39)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -0.000335) or not (y <= 9.2e+39):
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.000335) || !(y <= 9.2e+39))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -0.000335) || ~((y <= 9.2e+39)))
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.000335], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 9.2e+39]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.3500000000000001e-4 or 9.20000000000000047e39 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 71.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.3500000000000001e-4 < y < 9.20000000000000047e39

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      4. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. lower--.f64 81.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.000335 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 59.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-68} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.2e-68) (not (<= z 5e-135))) (* z y) (* 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e-68) || !(z <= 5e-135)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.2d-68)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5d-135))) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e-68) || !(z <= 5e-135)) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.2e-68) or not (z <= 5e-135):
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.2e-68) || !(z <= 5e-135))
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.2e-68) || ~((z <= 5e-135)))
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.2e-68], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5e-135]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.20000000000000002e-68 or 5.0000000000000002e-135 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -2.20000000000000002e-68 < z < 5.0000000000000002e-135

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      4. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. lower--.f64 70.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 70.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-68} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-135}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 58.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.0) (* (- z) x) (if (<= z 5e-135) (* 1.0 x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else if (z <= 5e-135) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -z * x
    else if (z <= 5d-135) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -z * x;
	} else if (z <= 5e-135) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.0:
		tmp = -z * x
	elif z <= 5e-135:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) * x);
	elseif (z <= 5e-135)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.0)
		tmp = -z * x;
	elseif (z <= 5e-135)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.0], N[((-z) * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 5e-135], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      4. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. lower--.f64 59.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 59.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-z\right) \cdot x \]

   if -1 < z < 5.0000000000000002e-135

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      4. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. lower--.f64 67.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 66.3%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]

   if 5.0000000000000002e-135 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 56.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- y x) z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((y - x), z, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(y - x), z, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 42.1% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 44.8

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 44.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

6. Final simplification 44.8%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024314 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* (- y x) z)))