Quotient of sum of exps

Percentage Accurate: 99.1% → 99.2%

Time: 6.5s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = 6.609610236866454e+140
  2. b = -8.367651880342157e+35

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(e^{b} + e^{a}\right), -1, a\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (exp (fma (log (+ (exp b) (exp a))) -1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(fma(log((exp(b) + exp(a))), -1.0, a));
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return exp(fma(log(Float64(exp(b) + exp(a))), -1.0, a))
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[Exp[N[(N[Log[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * -1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}}} \]

   2. clear-num N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

   3. associate-/r/ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \cdot e^{a}} \]

   4. inv-pow N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}^{-1}} \cdot e^{a} \]

   5. pow-to-exp N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \cdot -1}} \cdot e^{a} \]

   6. lift-exp.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto e^{\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \cdot -1} \cdot \color{blue}{e^{a}} \]

   7. prod-exp N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \cdot -1 + a}} \]

   8. lower-exp.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right) \cdot -1 + a}} \]

   9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right), -1, a\right)}} \]

   10. lower-log.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}, -1, a\right)} \]

   11. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}, -1, a\right)} \]

   12. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(e^{b} + e^{a}\right)}, -1, a\right)} \]

   13. lower-+.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(e^{b} + e^{a}\right)}, -1, a\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log \left(e^{b} + e^{a}\right), -1, a\right)}} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 0.0) (/ (exp a) 2.0) (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = exp(a) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 0.0:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 0.0)
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.5

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 67.1% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;{b}^{3} \cdot 0.020833333333333332\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -1.9e+154)
   (/ 1.0 (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (if (<= a -1000.0)
     (* (pow b 3.0) 0.020833333333333332)
     (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -1.9e+154) {
		tmp = 1.0 / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else if (a <= -1000.0) {
		tmp = pow(b, 3.0) * 0.020833333333333332;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -1.9e+154)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	elseif (a <= -1000.0)
		tmp = Float64((b ^ 3.0) * 0.020833333333333332);
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -1.9e+154], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -1000.0], N[(N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * 0.020833333333333332), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -1.8999999999999999e154

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if -1.8999999999999999e154 < a < -1e3

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 20.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 20.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{48} \cdot {b}^{2} - \frac{1}{4}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 2.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b \cdot b, 0.020833333333333332, -0.25\right), \color{blue}{b}, 0.5\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{48} \cdot {b}^{\color{blue}{3}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 43.4%

       \[\leadsto {b}^{3} \cdot 0.020833333333333332 \]

   if -1e3 < a

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.5

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;{b}^{3} \cdot 0.020833333333333332\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 76.6% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.8e+95)
   (/ (exp a) 2.0)
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.8e+95) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.8e+95)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.8e+95], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.7999999999999999e95

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 75.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if 3.7999999999999999e95 < b

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 66.4% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 3.8e+95)
   (/ 1.0 (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 3.8e+95) {
		tmp = 1.0 / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 3.8e+95)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.8e+95], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 3.7999999999999999e95

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 75.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 57.4%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 3.7999999999999999e95 < b

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 62.8% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+152}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 7.2e+152)
   (/ 1.0 (fma (fma 0.5 a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (fma (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 7.2e+152) {
		tmp = 1.0 / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 7.2e+152)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / fma(fma(0.5, a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 7.2e+152], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(0.5 * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 7.1999999999999998e152

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 72.1

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot a\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2}, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 54.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 7.1999999999999998e152 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+152}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 53.2% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{-215}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 9.2e-215)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (+ (+ 1.0 a) 1.0))
   (pow (fma (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 9.2e-215) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / ((1.0 + a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 9.2e-215)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 9.2e-215], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 9.1999999999999996e-215

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 70.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 70.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 43.6

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 43.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]

   if 9.1999999999999996e-215 < b

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 84.3

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 52.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{-215}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 39.7% accurate, 17.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ (+ 1.0 a) 1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / ((1.0 + a) + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / ((1.0d0 + a) + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / ((1.0 + a) + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / ((1.0 + a) + 1.0)

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 + a) + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   2. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   3. lower-exp.f64 68.4

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

5. Applied rewrites 68.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 68.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]

9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 37.3%

    \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\left(1 + a\right) + 1} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 39.2% accurate, 315.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   3. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   4. lower-exp.f64 76.3

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

5. Applied rewrites 76.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 36.8%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- b a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp((b - a)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((b - a)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((b - a)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(b - a))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(b - a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024313 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "Quotient of sum of exps"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (/ 1 (+ 1 (exp (- b a)))))

  (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))