Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 57.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x + (y * Math.log(y))) - z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x + (y * math.log(y))) - z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * log(y))) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x + (y * log(y))) - z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x + N[(y * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.43:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\log y \cdot y - z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 0.43) (exp (- x z)) (exp (- (* (log y) y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.43) {
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = exp(((log(y) * y) - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 0.43d0) then
        tmp = exp((x - z))
    else
        tmp = exp(((log(y) * y) - z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.43) {
		tmp = Math.exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(((Math.log(y) * y) - z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 0.43:
		tmp = math.exp((x - z))
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(((math.log(y) * y) - z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 0.43)
		tmp = exp(Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(log(y) * y) - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 0.43)
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	else
		tmp = exp(((log(y) * y) - z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 0.43], N[Exp[N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 0.429999999999999993

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x - z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower--.f64 99.4

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x - z}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x - z}} \]

   if 0.429999999999999993 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y} - z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y} - z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y} - z} \]

      3. lower-log.f64 88.9

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log y} \cdot y - z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.9%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y} - z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 73.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -560000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -560000000000.0) (not (<= z 2.4e+47))) (exp (- z)) (pow y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -560000000000.0) || !(z <= 2.4e+47)) {
		tmp = exp(-z);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-560000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.4d+47))) then
        tmp = exp(-z)
    else
        tmp = y ** y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -560000000000.0) || !(z <= 2.4e+47)) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -560000000000.0) or not (z <= 2.4e+47):
		tmp = math.exp(-z)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -560000000000.0) || !(z <= 2.4e+47))
		tmp = exp(Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -560000000000.0) || ~((z <= 2.4e+47)))
		tmp = exp(-z);
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -560000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.4e+47]], $MachinePrecision]], N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision], N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.6e11 or 2.40000000000000019e47 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)}} \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 87.6

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-z}} \]

   if -5.6e11 < z < 2.40000000000000019e47

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x + y \cdot \log y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y + x}} \]

      2. exp-sum N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      5. exp-to-pow N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      6. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      7. lower-exp.f64 83.2

         \[\leadsto {y}^{y} \cdot \color{blue}{e^{x}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto {y}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 64.8%

      \[\leadsto {y}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -560000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{+184}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{x - z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{y}^{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.55e+184) (exp (- x z)) (pow y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.55e+184) {
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.55d+184) then
        tmp = exp((x - z))
    else
        tmp = y ** y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.55e+184) {
		tmp = Math.exp((x - z));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(y, y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.55e+184:
		tmp = math.exp((x - z))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(y, y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.55e+184)
		tmp = exp(Float64(x - z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.55e+184)
		tmp = exp((x - z));
	else
		tmp = y ^ y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.55e+184], N[Exp[N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.5499999999999999e184

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x - z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower--.f64 88.1

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x - z}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{x - z}} \]

   if 1.5499999999999999e184 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x + y \cdot \log y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y + x}} \]

      2. exp-sum N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      5. exp-to-pow N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      6. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

      7. lower-exp.f64 72.8

         \[\leadsto {y}^{y} \cdot \color{blue}{e^{x}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto {y}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 94.6%

      \[\leadsto {y}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 52.9% accurate, 2.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {y}^{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (pow y y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return pow(y, y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y ** y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.pow(y, y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.pow(y, y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y ^ y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y ^ y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Power[y, y], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[e^{\left(x + y \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{x + y \cdot \log y}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{y \cdot \log y + x}} \]

   2. exp-sum N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

   3. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

   5. exp-to-pow N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

   6. lower-pow.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y}} \cdot e^{x} \]

   7. lower-exp.f64 67.2

      \[\leadsto {y}^{y} \cdot \color{blue}{e^{x}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 67.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{y} \cdot e^{x}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto {y}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 48.2%

   \[\leadsto {y}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(x - z\right) + \log y \cdot y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return Math.exp(((x - z) + (Math.log(y) * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return math.exp(((x - z) + (math.log(y) * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return exp(Float64(Float64(x - z) + Float64(log(y) * y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = exp(((x - z) + (log(y) * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[Exp[N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024313 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Poisson.Internal:probability from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (exp (+ (- x z) (* (log y) y))))

  (exp (- (+ x (* y (log y))) z)))