Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.5% → 98.8%

Time: 3.5s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.2×

• 35.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma z t (fma b a (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(z, t, fma(b, a, (x * y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(z, t, fma(b, a, Float64(x * y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(z * t + N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right) \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y}\right) \]

   8. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + x \cdot y\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

   11. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

   12. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   13. lower-*.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 54.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+122}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+122)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) -5e-110) (* t z) (if (<= (* x y) 5e+100) (* a b) (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+122) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5e-110) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5e+100) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-1d+122)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= (-5d-110)) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((x * y) <= 5d+100) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+122) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= -5e-110) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 5e+100) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -1e+122:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= -5e-110:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (x * y) <= 5e+100:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+122)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= -5e-110)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 5e+100)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+122)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= -5e-110)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 5e+100)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+122], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-110], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+100], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.00000000000000001e122 or 4.9999999999999999e100 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 95.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 28.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 28.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 85.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 13.1%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 75.6

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 75.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000001e122 < (*.f64 x y) < -5e-110

   1. Initial program 96.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 64.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 89.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 53.9%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -5e-110 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.9999999999999999e100

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 56.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 51.2%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+122}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-110}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -5e-33)
   (fma t z (* x y))
   (if (<= (* x y) 2e+50) (fma b a (* t z)) (fma b a (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -5e-33) {
		tmp = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+50) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -5e-33)
		tmp = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+50)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e-33], N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+50], N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -5.00000000000000028e-33

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 38.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 38.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 87.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000028e-33 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.0000000000000002e50

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 95.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 2.0000000000000002e50 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 84.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -1e+124)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) 2e+50) (fma b a (* t z)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+124) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+50) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+124)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+50)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+124], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+50], N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.99999999999999948e123 or 2.0000000000000002e50 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 87.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999948e123 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.0000000000000002e50

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 89.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 80.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -1e+124)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 2e+160) (fma b a (* t z)) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -1e+124) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+160) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -1e+124)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+160)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+124], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+160], N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.99999999999999948e123 or 2.00000000000000001e160 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 23.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 23.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 89.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 12.1%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 80.8

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   14. Applied rewrites 80.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -9.99999999999999948e123 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.00000000000000001e160

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 86.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* t z) -2e-59) (* t z) (if (<= (* t z) 0.5) (* a b) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -2e-59) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t * z) <= (-2d-59)) then
        tmp = t * z
    else if ((t * z) <= 0.5d0) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = t * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -2e-59) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (t * z) <= -2e-59:
		tmp = t * z
	elif (t * z) <= 0.5:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = t * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -2e-59)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 0.5)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t * z) <= -2e-59)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif ((t * z) <= 0.5)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = t * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -2e-59], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -2.0000000000000001e-59 or 0.5 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 75.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. lower-*.f64 82.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   8. Applied rewrites 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 57.3%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e-59 < (*.f64 z t) < 0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 93.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 51.2%

      \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-59}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.2% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.6%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

   2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   4. lower-*.f64 66.7

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 66.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{b} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 34.8%

   \[\leadsto b \cdot \color{blue}{a} \]

9. Final simplification 34.8%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024308 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))