Linear.Projection:perspective from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 76.7% → 93.2%
Time: 2.2s
Alternatives: 4
Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (/ (* (* x 2.0) y) (- x y)))
double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y);
}
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) * y) / (x - y)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y);
}
def code(x, y):
	return ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y)
function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) * y) / Float64(x - y))
end
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y);
end
code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 4 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 76.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (/ (* (* x 2.0) y) (- x y)))
double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y);
}
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) * y) / (x - y)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y);
}
def code(x, y):
	return ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y)
function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) * y) / Float64(x - y))
end
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) * y) / (x - y);
end
code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 93.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(2 \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{x - y}\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-105}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-227}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{2}{x}, y, 2\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (* 2.0 x) (/ y (- x y)))))
   (if (<= y -3.8e-105)
     t_0
     (if (<= y 2.15e-227) (* (fma (/ 2.0 x) y 2.0) y) t_0))))
double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = (2.0 * x) * (y / (x - y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.8e-105) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 2.15e-227) {
		tmp = fma((2.0 / x), y, 2.0) * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(2.0 * x) * Float64(y / Float64(x - y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.8e-105)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 2.15e-227)
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(2.0 / x), y, 2.0) * y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y / N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -3.8e-105], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 2.15e-227], N[(N[(N[(2.0 / x), $MachinePrecision] * y + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \left(2 \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{x - y}\\
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-105}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-227}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{2}{x}, y, 2\right) \cdot y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -3.7999999999999998e-105 or 2.1500000000000001e-227 < y

    1. Initial program 78.5%

      \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y}} \]
      2. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}}{x - y} \]
      3. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{y}{x - y}} \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{x - y} \cdot \left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]
      5. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{x - y} \cdot \left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]
      6. lower-/.f6497.7

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{x - y}} \cdot \left(x \cdot 2\right) \]
      7. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{y}{x - y} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \]
      8. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{y}{x - y} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \]
      9. lower-*.f6497.7

        \[\leadsto \frac{y}{x - y} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{x - y} \cdot \left(2 \cdot x\right)} \]

    if -3.7999999999999998e-105 < y < 2.1500000000000001e-227

    1. Initial program 79.2%

      \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot \frac{{y}^{2}}{x}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot {y}^{2}}{x}} \]
      2. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)}}{x} \]
      3. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot y}}{x} \]
      4. associate-*l/N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot y}{x} \cdot y} \]
      5. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot 2}}{x} \cdot y \]
      6. associate-*r/N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \frac{2}{x}\right)} \cdot y \]
      7. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \left(y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1}}{x}\right) \cdot y \]
      8. associate-*r/N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot y + \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right)}\right) \cdot y \]
      9. distribute-rgt-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(2 + y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right)\right)} \]
      10. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) + 2\right)} \]
      11. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) + 2\right) \cdot y} \]
      12. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) + 2\right) \cdot y} \]
      13. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) \cdot y} + 2\right) \cdot y \]
      14. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{x}, y, 2\right)} \cdot y \]
      15. associate-*r/N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{x}}, y, 2\right) \cdot y \]
      16. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{x}, y, 2\right) \cdot y \]
      17. lower-/.f6492.8

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{2}{x}}, y, 2\right) \cdot y \]
    5. Applied rewrites92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{2}{x}, y, 2\right) \cdot y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification96.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-105}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(2 \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{x - y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-227}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{2}{x}, y, 2\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(2 \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{y}{x - y}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 72.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+112}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{y}, -2, -2\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.45e+112)
   (* (fma (/ x y) -2.0 -2.0) x)
   (if (<= y 8.8e-79) (* 2.0 y) (* -2.0 x))))
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.45e+112) {
		tmp = fma((x / y), -2.0, -2.0) * x;
	} else if (y <= 8.8e-79) {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.45e+112)
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(x / y), -2.0, -2.0) * x);
	elseif (y <= 8.8e-79)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.45e+112], N[(N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 8.8e-79], N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+112}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{y}, -2, -2\right) \cdot x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if y < -1.4500000000000001e112

    1. Initial program 66.8%

      \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \cdot x} \]
      2. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} - 2\right) \cdot x} \]
      3. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right)\right)} \cdot x \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} \cdot -2} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right)\right) \cdot x \]
      5. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{y} \cdot -2 + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \cdot x \]
      6. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{y}, -2, -2\right)} \cdot x \]
      7. lower-/.f6490.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}, -2, -2\right) \cdot x \]
    5. Applied rewrites90.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{y}, -2, -2\right) \cdot x} \]

    if -1.4500000000000001e112 < y < 8.7999999999999995e-79

    1. Initial program 80.5%

      \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-*.f6479.4

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
    5. Applied rewrites79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

    if 8.7999999999999995e-79 < y

    1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-*.f6480.9

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
    5. Applied rewrites80.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 72.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+112}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.45e+112) (* -2.0 x) (if (<= y 8.8e-79) (* 2.0 y) (* -2.0 x))))
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.45e+112) {
		tmp = -2.0 * x;
	} else if (y <= 8.8e-79) {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.45d+112)) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * x
    else if (y <= 8.8d-79) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * y
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.45e+112) {
		tmp = -2.0 * x;
	} else if (y <= 8.8e-79) {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.45e+112:
		tmp = -2.0 * x
	elif y <= 8.8e-79:
		tmp = 2.0 * y
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 * x
	return tmp
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.45e+112)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * x);
	elseif (y <= 8.8e-79)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.45e+112)
		tmp = -2.0 * x;
	elseif (y <= 8.8e-79)
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	else
		tmp = -2.0 * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.45e+112], N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 8.8e-79], N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{+112}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot x\\

\mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -1.4500000000000001e112 or 8.7999999999999995e-79 < y

    1. Initial program 76.7%

      \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-*.f6484.2

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
    5. Applied rewrites84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]

    if -1.4500000000000001e112 < y < 8.7999999999999995e-79

    1. Initial program 80.5%

      \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-*.f6479.4

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
    5. Applied rewrites79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 50.4% accurate, 4.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -2 \cdot x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* -2.0 x))
double code(double x, double y) {
	return -2.0 * x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (-2.0d0) * x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -2.0 * x;
}
def code(x, y):
	return -2.0 * x
function code(x, y)
	return Float64(-2.0 * x)
end
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -2.0 * x;
end
code[x_, y_] := N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-2 \cdot x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 78.7%

    \[\frac{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}{x - y} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lower-*.f6452.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
  5. Applied rewrites52.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{2 \cdot x}{x - y} \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;x < -1.7210442634149447 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x < 83645045635564430:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{\frac{x - y}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ (* 2.0 x) (- x y)) y)))
   (if (< x -1.7210442634149447e+81)
     t_0
     (if (< x 83645045635564430.0) (/ (* x 2.0) (/ (- x y) y)) t_0))))
double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = ((2.0 * x) / (x - y)) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (x < -1.7210442634149447e+81) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x < 83645045635564430.0) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / ((x - y) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((2.0d0 * x) / (x - y)) * y
    if (x < (-1.7210442634149447d+81)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x < 83645045635564430.0d0) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) / ((x - y) / y)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = ((2.0 * x) / (x - y)) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (x < -1.7210442634149447e+81) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x < 83645045635564430.0) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / ((x - y) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y):
	t_0 = ((2.0 * x) / (x - y)) * y
	tmp = 0
	if x < -1.7210442634149447e+81:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x < 83645045635564430.0:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / ((x - y) / y)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp
function code(x, y)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 * x) / Float64(x - y)) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x < -1.7210442634149447e+81)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x < 83645045635564430.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) / Float64(Float64(x - y) / y));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	t_0 = ((2.0 * x) / (x - y)) * y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x < -1.7210442634149447e+81)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x < 83645045635564430.0)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) / ((x - y) / y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[x, -1.7210442634149447e+81], t$95$0, If[Less[x, 83645045635564430.0], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{2 \cdot x}{x - y} \cdot y\\
\mathbf{if}\;x < -1.7210442634149447 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x < 83645045635564430:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x \cdot 2}{\frac{x - y}{y}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024308 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Linear.Projection:perspective from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< x -1721044263414944700000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (* (/ (* 2 x) (- x y)) y) (if (< x 83645045635564430) (/ (* x 2) (/ (- x y) y)) (* (/ (* 2 x) (- x y)) y))))

  (/ (* (* x 2.0) y) (- x y)))