Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 62.7% → 100.0%

Time: 3.7s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 3.3×

• 21.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (- (- (+ (* x y) (* y y)) (* y z)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(y * y)) - Float64(y * z)) - Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 62.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (- (- (+ (* x y) (* y y)) (* y z)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(y * y)) - Float64(y * z)) - Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (y * y)) - (y * z)) - (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 3.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x - z\right) \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- x z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x - z) * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x - z) * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x - z) * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x - z) * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 66.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   2. distribute-lft-out-- N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   4. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   5. lower--.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right)} \cdot y \]

5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 77.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(-z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-62}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- z) y)))
   (if (<= z -5e-62) t_0 (if (<= z 4.2e+33) (* y x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * y;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5e-62) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 4.2e+33) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -z * y
    if (z <= (-5d-62)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 4.2d+33) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -z * y;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5e-62) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 4.2e+33) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = -z * y
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5e-62:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 4.2e+33:
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-z) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5e-62)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 4.2e+33)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = -z * y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5e-62)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 4.2e+33)
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-z) * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -5e-62], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 4.2e+33], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.0000000000000002e-62 or 4.2000000000000001e33 < z

   1. Initial program 70.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot y} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} \cdot y \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 84.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -5.0000000000000002e-62 < z < 4.2000000000000001e33

   1. Initial program 61.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

      2. distribute-lft-out-- N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

      5. lower--.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 86.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 53.5% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 66.8%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + y \cdot y\right) - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   2. distribute-lft-out-- N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   4. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

   5. lower--.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right)} \cdot y \]

5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x - z\right) \cdot y} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 49.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

8. Applied rewrites 49.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 3.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x - z\right) \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- x z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x - z) * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x - z) * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x - z) * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x - z) * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024308 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (* (- x z) y))

  (- (- (+ (* x y) (* y y)) (* y z)) (* y y)))