Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quadForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 5.3s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 1.6×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ x (* y (sqrt z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * Math.sqrt(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * math.sqrt(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(x + Float64(y * sqrt(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + N[(y * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ x (* y (sqrt z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 / 2.0d0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * Math.sqrt(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * math.sqrt(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / 2.0) * Float64(x + Float64(y * sqrt(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 / 2.0) * (x + (y * sqrt(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + N[(y * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{z}, y, x\right) \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (fma (sqrt z) y x) 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(sqrt(z), y, x) * 0.5;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(fma(sqrt(z), y, x) * 0.5)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * y + x), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}} \]

   3. lower-*.f64 99.8

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}} \]

   4. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]

   5. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \sqrt{z} + x\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]

   6. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \sqrt{z}} + x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]

   7. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{z} \cdot y} + x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]

   8. lower-fma.f64 99.8

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{z}, y, x\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \]

   9. lift-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{z}, y, x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]

   10. metadata-eval 99.8

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{z}, y, x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\sqrt{z}, y, x\right) \cdot 0.5} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 75.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \sqrt{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+98} \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (sqrt z))))
   (if (or (<= t_0 -1e+98) (not (<= t_0 1e-14)))
     (* 0.5 (* (sqrt z) y))
     (* 0.5 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * sqrt(z);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e+98) || !(t_0 <= 1e-14)) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(z) * y);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * sqrt(z)
    if ((t_0 <= (-1d+98)) .or. (.not. (t_0 <= 1d-14))) then
        tmp = 0.5d0 * (sqrt(z) * y)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * Math.sqrt(z);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e+98) || !(t_0 <= 1e-14)) {
		tmp = 0.5 * (Math.sqrt(z) * y);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * math.sqrt(z)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -1e+98) or not (t_0 <= 1e-14):
		tmp = 0.5 * (math.sqrt(z) * y)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * sqrt(z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= -1e+98) || !(t_0 <= 1e-14))
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * Float64(sqrt(z) * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * sqrt(z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e+98) || ~((t_0 <= 1e-14)))
		tmp = 0.5 * (sqrt(z) * y);
	else
		tmp = 0.5 * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, -1e+98], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 1e-14]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(0.5 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y (sqrt.f64 z)) < -9.99999999999999998e97 or 9.99999999999999999e-15 < (*.f64 y (sqrt.f64 z))

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. lower-sqrt.f64 83.8

         \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{z}} \cdot y\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999998e97 < (*.f64 y (sqrt.f64 z)) < 9.99999999999999999e-15

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 79.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot \sqrt{z} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+98} \lor \neg \left(y \cdot \sqrt{z} \leq 10^{-14}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 51.4% accurate, 5.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.5 * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 0.5d0 * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.5 * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 0.5 * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(0.5 * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.5 * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(x + y \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 55.2

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

5. Applied rewrites 55.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024307 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quadForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* (/ 1.0 2.0) (+ x (* y (sqrt z)))))