Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, C

Percentage Accurate: 97.9% → 97.9%

Time: 4.3s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

• 32.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0d0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0d0)) + c
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(z * t) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(a * b) / 4.0)) + c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = (((x * y) + ((z * t) / 16.0)) - ((a * b) / 4.0)) + c;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ c + \left(\left(y \cdot x + \frac{t \cdot z}{16}\right) - \frac{b \cdot a}{4}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (+ c (- (+ (* y x) (/ (* t z) 16.0)) (/ (* b a) 4.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c + (((y * x) + ((t * z) / 16.0)) - ((b * a) / 4.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = c + (((y * x) + ((t * z) / 16.0d0)) - ((b * a) / 4.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return c + (((y * x) + ((t * z) / 16.0)) - ((b * a) / 4.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return c + (((y * x) + ((t * z) / 16.0)) - ((b * a) / 4.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(c + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(Float64(t * z) / 16.0)) - Float64(Float64(b * a) / 4.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = c + (((y * x) + ((t * z) / 16.0)) - ((b * a) / 4.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(c + N[(N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision] / 16.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto c + \left(\left(y \cdot x + \frac{t \cdot z}{16}\right) - \frac{b \cdot a}{4}\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 66.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-207}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+138}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (* t z) 0.0625 c)))
   (if (<= (* t z) -4e+93)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* t z) -5e-207)
       (fma y x c)
       (if (<= (* t z) 2e+138) (fma -0.25 (* b a) (* y x)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = fma((t * z), 0.0625, c);
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -4e+93) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((t * z) <= -5e-207) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	} else if ((t * z) <= 2e+138) {
		tmp = fma(-0.25, (b * a), (y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = fma(Float64(t * z), 0.0625, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -4e+93)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= -5e-207)
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 2e+138)
		tmp = fma(-0.25, Float64(b * a), Float64(y * x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.0625 + c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -4e+93], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -5e-207], N[(y * x + c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+138], N[(-0.25 * N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -4.00000000000000017e93 or 2.0000000000000001e138 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 90.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

   if -4.00000000000000017e93 < (*.f64 z t) < -5.00000000000000014e-207

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 82.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 40.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 75.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, c\right) \]

   if -5.00000000000000014e-207 < (*.f64 z t) < 2.0000000000000001e138

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(c + x \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4}} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \left(c + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, a \cdot b, c + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}, c + x \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}, c + x \cdot y\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + c}\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + c\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 97.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}, y \cdot x\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-207}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+138}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, y \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 90.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma y x (fma (* t z) 0.0625 c))))
   (if (<= (* t z) -4e+93)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* t z) 5e+66) (fma -0.25 (* b a) (fma y x c)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = fma(y, x, fma((t * z), 0.0625, c));
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -4e+93) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 5e+66) {
		tmp = fma(-0.25, (b * a), fma(y, x, c));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = fma(y, x, fma(Float64(t * z), 0.0625, c))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -4e+93)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 5e+66)
		tmp = fma(-0.25, Float64(b * a), fma(y, x, c));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * x + N[(N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.0625 + c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -4e+93], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 5e+66], N[(-0.25 * N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x + c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -4.00000000000000017e93 or 4.99999999999999991e66 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 91.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.00000000000000017e93 < (*.f64 z t) < 4.99999999999999991e66

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(c + x \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4}} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \left(c + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, a \cdot b, c + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}, c + x \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}, c + x \cdot y\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + c}\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + c\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 96.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 10^{+253}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (* t z) 0.0625 c)))
   (if (<= (* t z) -4e+93)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* t z) 1e+253) (fma -0.25 (* b a) (fma y x c)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = fma((t * z), 0.0625, c);
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -4e+93) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 1e+253) {
		tmp = fma(-0.25, (b * a), fma(y, x, c));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = fma(Float64(t * z), 0.0625, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -4e+93)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 1e+253)
		tmp = fma(-0.25, Float64(b * a), fma(y, x, c));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.0625 + c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -4e+93], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+253], N[(-0.25 * N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x + c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -4.00000000000000017e93 or 9.9999999999999994e252 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 92.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

   if -4.00000000000000017e93 < (*.f64 z t) < 9.9999999999999994e252

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + x \cdot y\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{4}\right)\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(c + x \cdot y\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4}} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + \left(c + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, a \cdot b, c + x \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}, c + x \cdot y\right) \]

      6. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, \color{blue}{b \cdot a}, c + x \cdot y\right) \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + c}\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{4}, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + c\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 94.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 10^{+253}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.25, b \cdot a, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 65.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (* t z) 0.0625 c)))
   (if (<= (* t z) -4e+93) t_1 (if (<= (* t z) 2e+167) (fma y x c) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = fma((t * z), 0.0625, c);
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -4e+93) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 2e+167) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = fma(Float64(t * z), 0.0625, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -4e+93)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 2e+167)
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.0625 + c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -4e+93], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+167], N[(y * x + c), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -4.00000000000000017e93 or 2.0000000000000001e167 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 90.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

   if -4.00000000000000017e93 < (*.f64 z t) < 2.0000000000000001e167

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 72.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 33.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 68.5%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, c\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+203}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 10^{+253}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 0.0625 (* t z))))
   (if (<= (* t z) -1e+203) t_1 (if (<= (* t z) 1e+253) (fma y x c) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = 0.0625 * (t * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -1e+203) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 1e+253) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(0.0625 * Float64(t * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -1e+203)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 1e+253)
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(0.0625 * N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -1e+203], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+253], N[(y * x + c), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -9.9999999999999999e202 or 9.9999999999999994e252 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 7.9

         \[\leadsto -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 7.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 80.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \cdot 0.0625 \]

   8. Applied rewrites 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.0625} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e202 < (*.f64 z t) < 9.9999999999999994e252

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 74.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 36.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 66.2%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, c\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+203}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 10^{+253}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.0625 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 62.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot -0.25\\ \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot a \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+228}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot a \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+215}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* b a) -0.25)))
   (if (<= (* b a) -2e+228) t_1 (if (<= (* b a) 2e+215) (fma y x c) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	double t_1 = (b * a) * -0.25;
	double tmp;
	if ((b * a) <= -2e+228) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((b * a) <= 2e+215) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(b * a) * -0.25)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(b * a) <= -2e+228)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(b * a) <= 2e+215)
		tmp = fma(y, x, c);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], -2e+228], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision], 2e+215], N[(y * x + c), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -1.9999999999999998e228 or 1.99999999999999981e215 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 92.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 88.3

         \[\leadsto -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

   if -1.9999999999999998e228 < (*.f64 a b) < 1.99999999999999981e215

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

      8. lower-*.f64 89.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 55.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 61.6%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, c\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot a \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+228}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot -0.25\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \cdot a \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+215}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot -0.25\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 49.1% accurate, 6.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c) :precision binary64 (fma y x c))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return fma(y, x, c);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return fma(y, x, c)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(y * x + c), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c + \left(\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+r+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, c + \frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right) + c}\right) \]

   6. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{1}{16}} + c\right) \]

   7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \frac{1}{16}, c\right)}\right) \]

   8. lower-*.f64 78.6

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}, 0.0625, c\right)\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 78.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, 0.0625, c\right)\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{16} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 48.5%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t \cdot z, \color{blue}{0.0625}, c\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in z around 0

   \[\leadsto c + \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 54.0%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x}, c\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 28.6% accurate, 7.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c) :precision binary64 (* y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return y * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = y * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c) {
	return y * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c):
	return y * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	return Float64(y * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c)
	tmp = y * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_] := N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + \frac{z \cdot t}{16}\right) - \frac{a \cdot b}{4}\right) + c \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

   3. lower-*.f64 25.1

      \[\leadsto -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 25.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 33.2

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

8. Applied rewrites 33.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024304 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- (+ (* x y) (/ (* z t) 16.0)) (/ (* a b) 4.0)) c))