Quotient of sum of exps

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.6%

Time: 5.2s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = 1.4105997928806496e+241
  2. b = 2.2626144647694722e+126

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 2e-5) (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) 1.0)) (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-5) {
		tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 2d-5) then
        tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + 1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 2e-5) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + 1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 2e-5:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + 1.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-5)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + 1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-5)
		tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + 1.0);
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 2e-5], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 2.00000000000000016e-5

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   if 2.00000000000000016e-5 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.6

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 56.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \leq 0.4999997877793247:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b, b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))) 0.4999997877793247)
   (pow (fma (* (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b) b 2.0) -1.0)
   0.5))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))) <= 0.4999997877793247) {
		tmp = pow(fma((fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b))) <= 0.4999997877793247)
		tmp = fma(Float64(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.4999997877793247], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (exp.f64 a) (+.f64 (exp.f64 a) (exp.f64 b))) < 0.499999787779324689

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 58.6

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 40.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left({b}^{2} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{b}\right), b, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 39.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b, b, 2\right)} \]

   if 0.499999787779324689 < (/.f64 (exp.f64 a) (+.f64 (exp.f64 a) (exp.f64 b)))

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 97.8

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 66.3%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \leq 0.4999997877793247:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b, b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp a) 2e-5) (/ (exp a) 2.0) (pow (+ (exp b) 1.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-5) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow((exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(a) <= 2d-5) then
        tmp = exp(a) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0d0) ** (-1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(a) <= 2e-5) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow((Math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(a) <= 2e-5:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = math.pow((math.exp(b) + 1.0), -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-5)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(a) <= 2e-5)
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (exp(b) + 1.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision], 2e-5], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 a) < 2.00000000000000016e-5

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if 2.00000000000000016e-5 < (exp.f64 a)

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 98.6

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{a} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(e^{b} + 1\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 57.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 0.98:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 0.98)
   0.5
   (pow (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 0.98) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 0.98)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 0.98], 0.5, N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 0.97999999999999998

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 94.6

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 17.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

   if 0.97999999999999998 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 74.8

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 0.98:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 57.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 0.98:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot b, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 0.98)
   0.5
   (pow (fma (fma (* 0.16666666666666666 b) b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 0.98) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma((0.16666666666666666 * b), b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 0.98)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(Float64(0.16666666666666666 * b), b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 0.98], 0.5, N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 0.97999999999999998

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 94.6

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 17.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

   if 0.97999999999999998 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 74.8

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{6} \cdot b, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 63.3%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot b, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 0.98:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot b, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 57.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 2.0)
   0.5
   (pow (* (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b 1.0) b) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = pow((fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5), b, 1.0) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], 0.5, N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 2

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 71.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

   if 2 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 66.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{{b}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{{b}^{2}}\right)}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 66.9%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 57.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 2.0)
   0.5
   (pow (* (* (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b) b) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(((fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 2.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 2.0], 0.5, N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 2

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 71.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

   if 2 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 66.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{{b}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{b}}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 66.9%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 52.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 0.98:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 0.98) 0.5 (pow (fma (fma 0.5 b 1.0) b 2.0) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 0.98) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 0.98)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(0.5, b, 1.0), b, 2.0) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 0.98], 0.5, N[Power[N[(N[(0.5 * b + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 0.97999999999999998

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 94.6

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 17.9%

      \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

   if 0.97999999999999998 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 74.8

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 58.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 0.98:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, b, 1\right), b, 2\right)\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 76.9% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 1e+103)
   (/ (exp a) 2.0)
   (pow (* (* (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b) b) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 1e+103) {
		tmp = exp(a) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(((fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 1e+103)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 1e+103], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 1e103

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 72.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2} \]

   if 1e103 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{{b}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{b}}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 71.0% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 2.05e+101)
   (/ (+ 1.0 a) (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 a 0.5) a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (* (* (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b) b) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.05e+101) {
		tmp = (1.0 + a) / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(((fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 2.05e+101)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + a) / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.05e+101], N[(N[(1.0 + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * a + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 2.05e101

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 72.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + a \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot a\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{6}, a, \frac{1}{2}\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. lower-+.f64 62.0

          \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   11. Applied rewrites 62.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 + a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 2.05e101 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{{b}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{b}}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 98.1%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + a}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 70.7% accurate, 2.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 2.05e+101)
   (/ 1.0 (fma (fma (fma 0.16666666666666666 a 0.5) a 1.0) a 2.0))
   (pow (* (* (fma 0.16666666666666666 b 0.5) b) b) -1.0)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.05e+101) {
		tmp = 1.0 / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(((fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b), -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 2.05e+101)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / fma(fma(fma(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5), a, 1.0), a, 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(fma(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5) * b) * b) ^ -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.05e+101], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * a + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * a + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[N[(N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * b + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 2.05e101

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{1 + e^{a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      2. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-exp.f64 72.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{e^{a} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{2 + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(1 + a \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot a\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), \color{blue}{a}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{6}, a, \frac{1}{2}\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 61.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)} \]

   if 2.05e101 < b

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

      4. lower-exp.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{6} \cdot b\right)\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right), b, 1\right), \color{blue}{b}, 2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{{b}^{3} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{b}}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 98.1%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, a, 0.5\right), a, 1\right), a, 2\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.16666666666666666, b, 0.5\right) \cdot b\right) \cdot b\right)}^{-1}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 39.3% accurate, 315.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.8%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   3. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

   4. lower-exp.f64 79.0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{b}} + 1} \]

5. Applied rewrites 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{b} + 1}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 36.3%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- b a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp((b - a)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((b - a)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((b - a)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(b - a))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(b - a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024302 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "Quotient of sum of exps"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (/ 1 (+ 1 (exp (- b a)))))

  (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))