Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.3s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.2×

• 21.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x + z, y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (+ x z) y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((x + z), y, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(x + z), y, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} + x \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right) \cdot y} + x \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + x, y, x\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + x, y, x\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x + z, y, x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ x z))))
   (if (<= y -4.9e-30) t_0 (if (<= y 2.95e-53) (fma y x x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.9e-30) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 2.95e-53) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(x + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4.9e-30)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 2.95e-53)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -4.9e-30], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 2.95e-53], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.89999999999999971e-30 or 2.95e-53 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      4. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      5. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + x \cdot y\right)} + x \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y + \left(x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x \cdot y + x\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 98.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot x + -1 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)\right) \cdot y} \]

      4. neg-mul-1 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-1 \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)\right)} \cdot y \]

      5. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(x + z\right)\right)\right)}\right)\right) \cdot y \]

      6. remove-double-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \cdot y \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right) \cdot y} \]

      8. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \cdot y \]

      9. lower-+.f64 95.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \cdot y \]

   7. Applied rewrites 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -4.89999999999999971e-30 < y < 2.95e-53

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 80.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.9 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{-53}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.45e+114) (* y z) (if (<= z 1.8e+24) (fma y x x) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.45e+114) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1.8e+24) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.45e+114)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 1.8e+24)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.45e+114], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.8e+24], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.45e114 or 1.79999999999999992e24 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 69.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -2.45e114 < z < 1.79999999999999992e24

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 82.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.45 \cdot 10^{+114}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 50.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.7e+86) (* y z) (if (<= z 1.1e-124) (* y x) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.7e+86) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1.1e-124) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.7d+86)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (z <= 1.1d-124) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.7e+86) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1.1e-124) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.7e+86:
		tmp = y * z
	elif z <= 1.1e-124:
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.7e+86)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 1.1e-124)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.7e+86)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (z <= 1.1e-124)
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.7e+86], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.1e-124], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.70000000000000018e86 or 1.0999999999999999e-124 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 61.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -2.70000000000000018e86 < z < 1.0999999999999999e-124

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 87.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 39.7%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 27.9% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 64.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 64.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 28.5%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024298 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))