Linear.V3:cross from linear-1.19.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.2% → 99.6%

Time: 3.8s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 23.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(-t\right) \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma y x (* (- t) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, x, (-t * z));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, x, Float64(Float64(-t) * z))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * x + N[((-t) * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.2%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift--.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - z \cdot t} \]

   2. sub-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

   6. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

   7. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   8. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) \]

   9. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) \]

   10. lower-neg.f64 99.6

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(-t\right)} \cdot z\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(-t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 73.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -4e-124) (not (<= (* x y) 1e+87))) (* y x) (* (- z) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4e-124) || !((x * y) <= 1e+87)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-4d-124)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 1d+87))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = -z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -4e-124) || !((x * y) <= 1e+87)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = -z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -4e-124) or not ((x * y) <= 1e+87):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = -z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -4e-124) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 1e+87))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -4e-124) || ~(((x * y) <= 1e+87)))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = -z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -4e-124], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+87]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[((-z) * t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -3.99999999999999973e-124 or 9.9999999999999996e86 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} \cdot t \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 27.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot t \]

   5. Applied rewrites 27.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 3.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot t \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 75.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   10. Applied rewrites 75.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -3.99999999999999973e-124 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.9999999999999996e86

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} \cdot t \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 84.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot t \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-124} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.2%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 52.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return y * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = y * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return y * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return y * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(y * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = y * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.2%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

   2. associate-*r* N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

   3. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

   4. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} \cdot t \]

   5. lower-neg.f64 52.4

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot t \]

5. Applied rewrites 52.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 3.7%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot t \]

8. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 51.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

10. Applied rewrites 51.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
11. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024298 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Linear.V3:cross from linear-1.19.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* x y) (* z t)))