Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.6% → 98.3%

Time: 9.0s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 5.2×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = 1.3751545571974145e-139
  2. y = 2.1008378318826325e+41
  3. z = -6.796996932591199e-14

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{e^{-z}}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (/ (exp (- z)) y) x)))
   (if (<= y -3.4e+31) t_0 (if (<= y 4.2e-39) (+ (/ 1.0 y) x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (exp(-z) / y) + x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.4e+31) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-39) {
		tmp = (1.0 / y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (exp(-z) / y) + x
    if (y <= (-3.4d+31)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 4.2d-39) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 / y) + x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (Math.exp(-z) / y) + x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.4e+31) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-39) {
		tmp = (1.0 / y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (math.exp(-z) / y) + x
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.4e+31:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 4.2e-39:
		tmp = (1.0 / y) + x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y) + x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.4e+31)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-39)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (exp(-z) / y) + x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.4e+31)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-39)
		tmp = (1.0 / y) + x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -3.4e+31], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-39], N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.3999999999999998e31 or 4.19999999999999987e-39 < y

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -3.3999999999999998e31 < y < 4.19999999999999987e-39

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.4 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y} + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.7% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5\right), z, -1\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot y}{y}}{y}, z, 1\right)}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (/ 1.0 y) x)))
   (if (<= y -1.35e+154)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -1.55e+33)
       (+
        (/
         (fma
          (/ (/ (* (* (fma (fma -0.16666666666666666 z 0.5) z -1.0) y) y) y) y)
          z
          1.0)
         y)
        x)
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 / y) + x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.35e+154) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -1.55e+33) {
		tmp = (fma(((((fma(fma(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5), z, -1.0) * y) * y) / y) / y), z, 1.0) / y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) + x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.35e+154)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -1.55e+33)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(fma(fma(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5), z, -1.0) * y) * y) / y) / y), z, 1.0) / y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.35e+154], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -1.55e+33], N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(-0.16666666666666666 * z + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] * z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.35000000000000003e154 or -1.55e33 < y

   1. Initial program 85.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 89.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

   if -1.35000000000000003e154 < y < -1.55e33

   1. Initial program 82.7%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1\right) + 1}}{y} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1\right) \cdot z} + 1}{y} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1, z, 1\right)}}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(0.16666666666666666 + \frac{0.5}{y}\right) + \frac{0.3333333333333333}{y \cdot y}, -z, \frac{0.5}{y} + 0.5\right), z, -1\right), z, 1\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{-1}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z\right) - 1\right) + z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{2} \cdot z\right)\right)}{{y}^{2}}, z, 1\right)}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 88.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.5, z, 0.5\right), z, \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5\right), z, -1\right) \cdot y\right), y, \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot z\right) \cdot z\right)}{y}}{y}, z, 1\right)}{y} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{{y}^{2} \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z\right) - 1\right)}{y}}{y}, z, 1\right)}{y} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 88.7%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5\right), z, -1\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot y}{y}}{y}, z, 1\right)}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\frac{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5\right), z, -1\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot y}{y}}{y}, z, 1\right)}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y} + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.3% accurate, 5.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5\right), z, -1\right), z, 1\right)}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (/ 1.0 y) x)))
   (if (<= y -5.9e+159)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -1.55e+33)
       (+ (/ (fma (fma (fma -0.16666666666666666 z 0.5) z -1.0) z 1.0) y) x)
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 / y) + x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.9e+159) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -1.55e+33) {
		tmp = (fma(fma(fma(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5), z, -1.0), z, 1.0) / y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) + x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.9e+159)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -1.55e+33)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(fma(fma(fma(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5), z, -1.0), z, 1.0) / y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -5.9e+159], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -1.55e+33], N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(-0.16666666666666666 * z + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * z + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.89999999999999993e159 or -1.55e33 < y

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 89.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

   if -5.89999999999999993e159 < y < -1.55e33

   1. Initial program 84.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1\right) + 1}}{y} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1\right) \cdot z} + 1}{y} \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} + \left(-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{1}{6} + \left(\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{{y}^{2}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right)\right) + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)\right) - 1, z, 1\right)}}{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(0.16666666666666666 + \frac{0.5}{y}\right) + \frac{0.3333333333333333}{y \cdot y}, -z, \frac{0.5}{y} + 0.5\right), z, -1\right), z, 1\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{-1}{6} \cdot z, z, -1\right), z, 1\right)}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5\right), z, -1\right), z, 1\right)}{y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.9 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.16666666666666666, z, 0.5\right), z, -1\right), z, 1\right)}{y} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y} + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.3% accurate, 15.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{y} + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 y) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / y) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 / y) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 / y) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 / y) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / y) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 / y) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 84.6%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{y} \]

6. Final simplification 84.6%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{y} + x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 39.8% accurate, 19.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 / y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 1.0d0 / y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 1.0 / y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 1.0 / y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(1.0 / y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 1.0 / y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.1%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 40.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 91.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024296 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 17788539399477/2500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))