Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (32)

Percentage Accurate: 76.5% → 96.4%

Time: 9.6s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 2.8×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M))
  (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - fabs((m - n)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = cos((((k * (m + n)) / 2.0d0) - m_1)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0d0) - m_1) ** 2.0d0) - (l - abs((m - n)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * Math.exp((-Math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - Math.abs((m - n)))));
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * math.exp((-math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - math.fabs((m - n)))))

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(Float64(Float64(Float64(K * Float64(m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp(Float64(Float64(-(Float64(Float64(Float64(m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0)) - Float64(l - abs(Float64(m - n))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0) - (l - abs((m - n)))));
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[N[(N[(N[(K * N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[((-N[Power[N[(N[(N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]) - N[(l - N[Abs[N[(m - n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M))
  (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - fabs((m - n)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = cos((((k * (m + n)) / 2.0d0) - m_1)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0d0) - m_1) ** 2.0d0) - (l - abs((m - n)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * Math.exp((-Math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - Math.abs((m - n)))));
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * math.exp((-math.pow((((m + n) / 2.0) - M), 2.0) - (l - math.fabs((m - n)))))

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(Float64(Float64(Float64(K * Float64(m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp(Float64(Float64(-(Float64(Float64(Float64(m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0)) - Float64(l - abs(Float64(m - n))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = cos((((K * (m + n)) / 2.0) - M)) * exp((-((((m + n) / 2.0) - M) ^ 2.0) - (l - abs((m - n)))));
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[N[(N[(N[(K * N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[((-N[Power[N[(N[(N[(m + n), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - M), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]) - N[(l - N[Abs[N[(m - n), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \cos M \cdot e^{\left|n - m\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (* (cos M) (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (+ (pow (fma 0.5 (+ n m) (- M)) 2.0) l)))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return cos(M) * exp((fabs((n - m)) - (pow(fma(0.5, (n + m), -M), 2.0) + l)));
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return Float64(cos(M) * exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - Float64((fma(0.5, Float64(n + m), Float64(-M)) ^ 2.0) + l))))
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[(N[Cos[M], $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Power[N[(0.5 * N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision] + (-M)), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 80.6%

   \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

6. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \cos M \cdot e^{\left|n - m\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M\\ \mathbf{if}\;M \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;M \leq 5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.25 \cdot \left(n + m\right), \ell\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp (* (- M) M)) (cos M))))
   (if (<= M -4e+95)
     t_0
     (if (<= M 5.4)
       (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (fma (+ n m) (* 0.25 (+ n m)) l)))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double t_0 = exp((-M * M)) * cos(M);
	double tmp;
	if (M <= -4e+95) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (M <= 5.4) {
		tmp = exp((fabs((n - m)) - fma((n + m), (0.25 * (n + m)), l)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	t_0 = Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(-M) * M)) * cos(M))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (M <= -4e+95)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (M <= 5.4)
		tmp = exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - fma(Float64(n + m), Float64(0.25 * Float64(n + m)), l)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[N[((-M) * M), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[M], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[M, -4e+95], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[M, 5.4], N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.25 * N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if M < -4.00000000000000008e95 or 5.4000000000000004 < M

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot {M}^{2}} \cdot \cos M \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.1%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M \]

   if -4.00000000000000008e95 < M < 5.4000000000000004

   1. Initial program 78.1%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 96.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

   10. Applied rewrites 96.4%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, \left(n + m\right) \cdot 0.25, \ell\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;M \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M\\ \mathbf{elif}\;M \leq 5.4:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.25 \cdot \left(n + m\right), \ell\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-M\right) \cdot M} \cdot \cos M\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 86.6% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.25 \cdot \left(n + m\right), \ell\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (exp (- (fabs (- n m)) (fma (+ n m) (* 0.25 (+ n m)) l))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return exp((fabs((n - m)) - fma((n + m), (0.25 * (n + m)), l)));
}

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return exp(Float64(abs(Float64(n - m)) - fma(Float64(n + m), Float64(0.25 * Float64(n + m)), l)))
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[Exp[N[(N[Abs[N[(n - m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.25 * N[(n + m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + l), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 80.6%

   \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 86.0%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

10. Applied rewrites 86.0%

    \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, \left(n + m\right) \cdot 0.25, \ell\right)} \]

11. Final simplification 86.0%

    \[\leadsto e^{\left|n - m\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(n + m, 0.25 \cdot \left(n + m\right), \ell\right)} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 64.6% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;n \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;n \leq 52:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-\ell}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(n \cdot n\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= n 2.4e-69)
   (exp (* -0.25 (* m m)))
   (if (<= n 52.0) (exp (- l)) (exp (* (* n n) -0.25)))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (n <= 2.4e-69) {
		tmp = exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	} else if (n <= 52.0) {
		tmp = exp(-l);
	} else {
		tmp = exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (n <= 2.4d-69) then
        tmp = exp(((-0.25d0) * (m * m)))
    else if (n <= 52.0d0) then
        tmp = exp(-l)
    else
        tmp = exp(((n * n) * (-0.25d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double tmp;
	if (n <= 2.4e-69) {
		tmp = Math.exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	} else if (n <= 52.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-l);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	tmp = 0
	if n <= 2.4e-69:
		tmp = math.exp((-0.25 * (m * m)))
	elif n <= 52.0:
		tmp = math.exp(-l)
	else:
		tmp = math.exp(((n * n) * -0.25))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (n <= 2.4e-69)
		tmp = exp(Float64(-0.25 * Float64(m * m)));
	elseif (n <= 52.0)
		tmp = exp(Float64(-l));
	else
		tmp = exp(Float64(Float64(n * n) * -0.25));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (n <= 2.4e-69)
		tmp = exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	elseif (n <= 52.0)
		tmp = exp(-l);
	else
		tmp = exp(((n * n) * -0.25));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := If[LessEqual[n, 2.4e-69], N[Exp[N[(-0.25 * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[n, 52.0], N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision], N[Exp[N[(N[(n * n), $MachinePrecision] * -0.25), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if n < 2.4000000000000001e-69

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 81.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 49.1%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if 2.4000000000000001e-69 < n < 52

   1. Initial program 78.7%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in l around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot \ell} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 44.3%

       \[\leadsto e^{-\ell} \]

   if 52 < n

   1. Initial program 79.7%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 98.7%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in n around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {n}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 98.7%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(n \cdot n\right) \cdot -0.25} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;n \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;n \leq 52:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-\ell}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(n \cdot n\right) \cdot -0.25}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 67.2% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -54:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-\ell}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (exp (* -0.25 (* m m)))))
   (if (<= m -54.0) t_0 (if (<= m 1.22e-68) (exp (- l)) t_0))))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double t_0 = exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -54.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.22e-68) {
		tmp = exp(-l);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp(((-0.25d0) * (m * m)))
    if (m <= (-54.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (m <= 1.22d-68) then
        tmp = exp(-l)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -54.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (m <= 1.22e-68) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-l);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	t_0 = math.exp((-0.25 * (m * m)))
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -54.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif m <= 1.22e-68:
		tmp = math.exp(-l)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	t_0 = exp(Float64(-0.25 * Float64(m * m)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -54.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.22e-68)
		tmp = exp(Float64(-l));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	t_0 = exp((-0.25 * (m * m)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -54.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (m <= 1.22e-68)
		tmp = exp(-l);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[Exp[N[(-0.25 * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, -54.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[m, 1.22e-68], N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -54 or 1.2200000000000001e-68 < m

   1. Initial program 71.4%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 95.5%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in m around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{\frac{-1}{4} \cdot {m}^{2}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 88.3%

       \[\leadsto e^{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot -0.25} \]

   if -54 < m < 1.2200000000000001e-68

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 76.4%

      \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in l around inf

      \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot \ell} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

   11. Applied rewrites 42.6%

       \[\leadsto e^{-\ell} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -54:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-\ell}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{-0.25 \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 35.0% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{-\ell} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (K m n M l) :precision binary64 (exp (- l)))

C

double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return exp(-l);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(k, m, n, m_1, l)
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: n
    real(8), intent (in) :: m_1
    real(8), intent (in) :: l
    code = exp(-l)
end function

Java

public static double code(double K, double m, double n, double M, double l) {
	return Math.exp(-l);
}

Python

def code(K, m, n, M, l):
	return math.exp(-l)

Julia

function code(K, m, n, M, l)
	return exp(Float64(-l))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(K, m, n, M, l)
	tmp = exp(-l);
end

Wolfram

code[K_, m_, n_, M_, l_] := N[Exp[(-l)], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 80.6%

   \[\cos \left(\frac{K \cdot \left(m + n\right)}{2} - M\right) \cdot e^{\left(-{\left(\frac{m + n}{2} - M\right)}^{2}\right) - \left(\ell - \left|m - n\right|\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in K around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right) \cdot e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + {\left(\frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(m + n\right) - M\right)}^{2}\right)} \cdot \cos \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(M\right)\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, n + m, -M\right)\right)}^{2} + \ell\right)} \cdot \cos M} \]

6. Taylor expanded in M around 0

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \left(\ell + \frac{1}{4} \cdot {\left(m + n\right)}^{2}\right)} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 86.0%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left|m - n\right| - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.25, {\left(n + m\right)}^{2}, \ell\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in l around inf

   \[\leadsto e^{-1 \cdot \ell} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 36.8%

    \[\leadsto e^{-\ell} \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024295 
(FPCore (K m n M l)
  :name "Maksimov and Kolovsky, Equation (32)"
  :precision binary64
  (* (cos (- (/ (* K (+ m n)) 2.0) M)) (exp (- (- (pow (- (/ (+ m n) 2.0) M) 2.0)) (- l (fabs (- m n)))))))