Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 77.8% → 98.7%
Time: 8.0s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 55.2×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 77.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{\frac{wj}{x} - e^{-wj}}{wj - -1} \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp wj) wj)))
   (if (<= (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ t_0 (exp wj)))) 5e-14)
     (fma
      (fma
       (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
       wj
       (* -2.0 x))
      wj
      x)
     (- wj (* (/ (- (/ wj x) (exp (- wj))) (- wj -1.0)) x)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = exp(wj) * wj;
	double tmp;
	if ((wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)))) <= 5e-14) {
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	} else {
		tmp = wj - ((((wj / x) - exp(-wj)) / (wj - -1.0)) * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(exp(wj) * wj)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(t_0 + exp(wj)))) <= 5e-14)
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(wj / x) - exp(Float64(-wj))) / Float64(wj - -1.0)) * x));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 5e-14], N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj - N[(N[(N[(N[(wj / x), $MachinePrecision] - N[Exp[(-wj)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(wj - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\
\mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \frac{\frac{wj}{x} - e^{-wj}}{wj - -1} \cdot x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 5.0000000000000002e-14

    1. Initial program 70.0%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]

    if 5.0000000000000002e-14 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

    1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right)} \]
      3. neg-sub0N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right) \]
      4. associate-+l-N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
      5. unsub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
      6. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(0 - \left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}}\right)\right) \]
      7. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} + \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites99.9%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{wj}{1 + wj}}{x} - \frac{e^{-wj}}{1 + wj}\right) \cdot x} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites99.9%

        \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{wj}{x} - e^{-wj}}{1 + wj} \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
    7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
    8. Final simplification98.8%

      \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{e^{wj} \cdot wj - x}{e^{wj} \cdot wj + e^{wj}} \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{\frac{wj}{x} - e^{-wj}}{wj - -1} \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
    9. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 2: 96.5% accurate, 7.5× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (wj x)
     :precision binary64
     (fma
      (fma
       (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
       wj
       (* -2.0 x))
      wj
      x))
    double code(double wj, double x) {
    	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
    }
    
    function code(wj, x)
    	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
    end
    
    code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 77.7%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    5. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 3: 96.1% accurate, 17.4× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), x, wj\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (fma (fma 2.5 wj -2.0) x wj) wj x))
    double code(double wj, double x) {
    	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, wj, -2.0), x, wj), wj, x);
    }
    
    function code(wj, x)
    	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, wj, -2.0), x, wj), wj, x)
    end
    
    code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.5 * wj + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * x + wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), x, wj\right), wj, x\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 77.7%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj} + x \]
      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, wj, x\right)} \]
    7. Applied rewrites96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj + x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj} + x \]
      3. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot x\right)} \cdot wj + x \]
      4. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      5. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \cdot wj + x \]
      6. distribute-rgt-outN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      7. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-5}{2}}\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      8. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{-5}{2} \cdot x}\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      9. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{-5}{2}\right)\right) \cdot x\right)}\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      10. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{5}{2}} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      11. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 + \frac{5}{2} \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    10. Applied rewrites96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), x, wj\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    11. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 4: 95.9% accurate, 25.5× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, x, wj\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (fma -2.0 x wj) wj x))
    double code(double wj, double x) {
    	return fma(fma(-2.0, x, wj), wj, x);
    }
    
    function code(wj, x)
    	return fma(fma(-2.0, x, wj), wj, x)
    end
    
    code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(-2.0 * x + wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, x, wj\right), wj, x\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 77.7%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj} + x \]
      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, wj, x\right)} \]
    7. Applied rewrites96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj + x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj} + x \]
      3. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot x\right)} \cdot wj + x \]
      4. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      5. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)} \cdot wj + x \]
      6. distribute-rgt-outN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      7. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-5}{2}}\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      8. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{-5}{2} \cdot x}\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      9. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{-5}{2}\right)\right) \cdot x\right)}\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      10. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{5}{2}} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot wj + x \]
      11. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 + \frac{5}{2} \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    10. Applied rewrites96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), x, wj\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    11. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, x, wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
    12. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites96.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, x, wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 5: 15.1% accurate, 27.5× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.05 \cdot 10^{-100}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x)
       :precision binary64
       (if (<= x -3.05e-100) (+ -1.0 wj) (* wj wj)))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (x <= -3.05e-100) {
      		tmp = -1.0 + wj;
      	} else {
      		tmp = wj * wj;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      real(8) function code(wj, x)
          real(8), intent (in) :: wj
          real(8), intent (in) :: x
          real(8) :: tmp
          if (x <= (-3.05d-100)) then
              tmp = (-1.0d0) + wj
          else
              tmp = wj * wj
          end if
          code = tmp
      end function
      
      public static double code(double wj, double x) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (x <= -3.05e-100) {
      		tmp = -1.0 + wj;
      	} else {
      		tmp = wj * wj;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      def code(wj, x):
      	tmp = 0
      	if x <= -3.05e-100:
      		tmp = -1.0 + wj
      	else:
      		tmp = wj * wj
      	return tmp
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (x <= -3.05e-100)
      		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + wj);
      	else
      		tmp = Float64(wj * wj);
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
      	tmp = 0.0;
      	if (x <= -3.05e-100)
      		tmp = -1.0 + wj;
      	else
      		tmp = wj * wj;
      	end
      	tmp_2 = tmp;
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3.05e-100], N[(-1.0 + wj), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.05 \cdot 10^{-100}:\\
      \;\;\;\;-1 + wj\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if x < -3.05e-100

        1. Initial program 96.6%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. sub-negN/A

            \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
          2. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + 1\right)} \]
          3. distribute-lft-inN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1} \]
          4. distribute-rgt-neg-outN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(wj \cdot \frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)} + wj \cdot 1 \]
          5. rgt-mult-inverseN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1 \]
          6. metadata-evalN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + wj \cdot 1 \]
          7. *-rgt-identityN/A

            \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{wj} \]
          8. lower-+.f647.2

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
        5. Applied rewrites7.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]

        if -3.05e-100 < x

        1. Initial program 67.6%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
        4. Applied rewrites96.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
          2. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj} + x \]
          3. lower-fma.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, wj, x\right)} \]
        7. Applied rewrites96.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj + x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), wj, x\right)} \]
        8. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto {wj}^{\color{blue}{2}} \]
        9. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites22.5%

            \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
        10. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
        11. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 6: 84.7% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* x wj) -2.0 x))
        double code(double wj, double x) {
        	return fma((x * wj), -2.0, x);
        }
        
        function code(wj, x)
        	return fma(Float64(x * wj), -2.0, x)
        end
        
        code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 77.7%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
          2. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right) \cdot -2} + x \]
          3. lower-fma.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
          4. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot wj}, -2, x\right) \]
          5. lower-*.f6484.0

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot wj}, -2, x\right) \]
        5. Applied rewrites84.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)} \]
        6. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 7: 84.3% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \cdot x \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* 1.0 x))
        double code(double wj, double x) {
        	return 1.0 * x;
        }
        
        real(8) function code(wj, x)
            real(8), intent (in) :: wj
            real(8), intent (in) :: x
            code = 1.0d0 * x
        end function
        
        public static double code(double wj, double x) {
        	return 1.0 * x;
        }
        
        def code(wj, x):
        	return 1.0 * x
        
        function code(wj, x)
        	return Float64(1.0 * x)
        end
        
        function tmp = code(wj, x)
        	tmp = 1.0 * x;
        end
        
        code[wj_, x_] := N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        1 \cdot x
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 77.7%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
        4. Applied rewrites97.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites96.5%

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
          2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

            \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right) + \frac{{wj}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]
          3. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites97.1%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj \cdot \frac{wj}{x}, 1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
            2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

              \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites83.5%

                \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
              2. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 8: 4.0% accurate, 82.8× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + wj \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 wj))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return -1.0 + wj;
              }
              
              real(8) function code(wj, x)
                  real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                  real(8), intent (in) :: x
                  code = (-1.0d0) + wj
              end function
              
              public static double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return -1.0 + wj;
              }
              
              def code(wj, x):
              	return -1.0 + wj
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return Float64(-1.0 + wj)
              end
              
              function tmp = code(wj, x)
              	tmp = -1.0 + wj;
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(-1.0 + wj), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              -1 + wj
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 77.7%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
              4. Step-by-step derivation
                1. sub-negN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
                2. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + 1\right)} \]
                3. distribute-lft-inN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1} \]
                4. distribute-rgt-neg-outN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(wj \cdot \frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                5. rgt-mult-inverseN/A

                  \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1 \]
                6. metadata-evalN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                7. *-rgt-identityN/A

                  \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{wj} \]
                8. lower-+.f644.6

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
              5. Applied rewrites4.6%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
              6. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 9: 3.3% accurate, 331.0× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 -1.0)
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return -1.0;
              }
              
              real(8) function code(wj, x)
                  real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                  real(8), intent (in) :: x
                  code = -1.0d0
              end function
              
              public static double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return -1.0;
              }
              
              def code(wj, x):
              	return -1.0
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return -1.0
              end
              
              function tmp = code(wj, x)
              	tmp = -1.0;
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := -1.0
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              -1
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 77.7%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
              4. Step-by-step derivation
                1. sub-negN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
                2. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + 1\right)} \]
                3. distribute-lft-inN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1} \]
                4. distribute-rgt-neg-outN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(wj \cdot \frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                5. rgt-mult-inverseN/A

                  \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1 \]
                6. metadata-evalN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                7. *-rgt-identityN/A

                  \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{wj} \]
                8. lower-+.f644.6

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
              5. Applied rewrites4.6%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
              6. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                \[\leadsto -1 \]
              7. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites3.4%

                  \[\leadsto -1 \]
                2. Add Preprocessing

                Developer Target 1: 78.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

                \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
                (FPCore (wj x)
                 :precision binary64
                 (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
                double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                }
                
                real(8) function code(wj, x)
                    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                    real(8), intent (in) :: x
                    code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
                end function
                
                public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
                }
                
                def code(wj, x):
                	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
                
                function code(wj, x)
                	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
                end
                
                function tmp = code(wj, x)
                	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                end
                
                code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
                
                \begin{array}{l}
                
                \\
                wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
                \end{array}
                

                Reproduce

                ?
                herbie shell --seed 2024295 
                (FPCore (wj x)
                  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
                  :precision binary64
                
                  :alt
                  (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
                
                  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))