Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 98.3% → 98.8%

Time: 6.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.8×

• 34.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 2, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (* z 2.0) z (fma z z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((z * 2.0), z, fma(z, z, (x * y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(z * 2.0), z, fma(z, z, Float64(x * y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(z * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]

   3. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. count-2 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]

   6. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]

   7. associate-*r* N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]

   8. count-2 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + z\right)} \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]

   9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + z, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   10. count-2 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]

   11. lower-*.f64 98.4

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]

   12. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot z}\right) \]

   13. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z + x \cdot y}\right) \]

   14. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right) \]

   15. lower-fma.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

   16. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

   17. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   18. lower-*.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 2, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 4e+55) (* x y) (fma z (+ z z) (* z z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 4e+55) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (z + z), (z * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 4e+55)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(z + z), Float64(z * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 4e+55], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 4.00000000000000004e55

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 25.5

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 4.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z}, 2 \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 81.9

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   12. Applied rewrites 81.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if 4.00000000000000004e55 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 96.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 87.4

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z + z}, z \cdot z\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.3% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 1e+64) (* x y) (* (* z z) 3.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+64) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * z) * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 1d+64) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (z * z) * 3.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+64) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * z) * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 1e+64:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (z * z) * 3.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e+64)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * z) * 3.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+64)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (z * z) * 3.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+64], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1.00000000000000002e64

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 25.9

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 25.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 26.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 4.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z}, 2 \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 81.4

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   12. Applied rewrites 81.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if 1.00000000000000002e64 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 88.0

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+254}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= (* z z) 1e+254) (* x y) (* z z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+254) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 1d+254) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+254) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 1e+254:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 1e+254)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 1e+254)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e+254], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z z) < 9.9999999999999994e253

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 38.6

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 38.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 38.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 7.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z}, 2 \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around inf

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

       2. lower-*.f64 67.5

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   12. Applied rewrites 67.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if 9.9999999999999994e253 < (*.f64 z z)

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 97.3

         \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

   9. Applied rewrites 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z}, 2 \cdot z\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around inf

       \[\leadsto {z}^{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

   12. Applied rewrites 86.5%

       \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 10^{+254}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y x (* (* z z) 3.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, x, ((z * z) * 3.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, x, Float64(Float64(z * z) * 3.0))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x + N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]

   3. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]

   4. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} + z \cdot z \]

   5. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) \]

   7. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) \]

   8. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} \]

   9. count-2 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z\right) \]

   10. distribute-lft1-in N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   11. metadata-eval N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{3} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   12. lower-*.f64 99.1

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, 3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 98.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot z, z, x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (* 3.0 z) z (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((3.0 * z), z, (x * y));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(3.0 * z), z, Float64(x * y))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(3.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + \left(x \cdot y + {z}^{2}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot {z}^{2} + \color{blue}{\left({z}^{2} + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. associate-+r+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}\right) + x \cdot y} \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} + x \cdot y \]

   4. metadata-eval N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} + x \cdot y \]

   5. unpow2 N/A

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   6. associate-*r* N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} + x \cdot y \]

   7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot z, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

   8. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{3 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   10. lower-*.f64 99.1

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot z, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot z, z, x \cdot y\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 33.6% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.3%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot {z}^{2} + {z}^{2}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft1-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

   2. metadata-eval N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3} \cdot {z}^{2} \]

   3. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]

   4. unpow2 N/A

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. lower-*.f64 56.0

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 56.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 56.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

9. Applied rewrites 30.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z}, 2 \cdot z\right) \]

10. Taylor expanded in z around inf

    \[\leadsto {z}^{\color{blue}{2}} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

12. Applied rewrites 34.1%

    \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 98.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((3.0d0 * z) * z) + (y * x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * z) * z) + Float64(y * x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(3.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024295 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (* 3 z) z) (* y x)))

  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))