Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 81.7% → 92.2%
Time: 6.9s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 81.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}
def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))
function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 92.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, y \cdot t\right)}, 2 \cdot y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 1.1e+94)
   (fma (/ z (fma -2.0 (* z z) (* y t))) (* 2.0 y) x)
   (- x (/ y z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.1e+94) {
		tmp = fma((z / fma(-2.0, (z * z), (y * t))), (2.0 * y), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.1e+94)
		tmp = fma(Float64(z / fma(-2.0, Float64(z * z), Float64(y * t))), Float64(2.0 * y), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.1e+94], N[(N[(z / N[(-2.0 * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, y \cdot t\right)}, 2 \cdot y, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < 1.10000000000000006e94

    1. Initial program 91.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} \]
      2. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]
      3. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right) + x} \]
      4. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right)\right) + x \]
      5. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right) + x \]
      6. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right)\right) + x \]
      7. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)}\right)\right) + x \]
      8. distribute-lft-neg-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 2\right)} + x \]
      9. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right), y \cdot 2, x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites95.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, t \cdot y\right)}, 2 \cdot y, x\right)} \]

    if 1.10000000000000006e94 < z

    1. Initial program 66.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-/.f64100.0

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification96.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+94}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, y \cdot t\right)}, 2 \cdot y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+116}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.86 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot z, \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- x (/ y z))))
   (if (<= z -1e+116)
     t_1
     (if (<= z 1.86e+65)
       (fma (* y z) (/ 2.0 (fma -2.0 (* z z) (* y t))) x)
       t_1))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1e+116) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.86e+65) {
		tmp = fma((y * z), (2.0 / fma(-2.0, (z * z), (y * t))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1e+116)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.86e+65)
		tmp = fma(Float64(y * z), Float64(2.0 / fma(-2.0, Float64(z * z), Float64(y * t))), x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1e+116], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 1.86e+65], N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(2.0 / N[(-2.0 * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+116}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.86 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot z, \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -1.00000000000000002e116 or 1.8599999999999999e65 < z

    1. Initial program 71.6%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-/.f6496.3

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites96.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

    if -1.00000000000000002e116 < z < 1.8599999999999999e65

    1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} \]
      2. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]
      3. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right) + x} \]
      4. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right)\right) + x \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)}} + x \]
      6. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      7. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      8. associate-*l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      9. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      10. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      11. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)}} + x \]
      12. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot z, \frac{2}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)}, x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot y, \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, t \cdot y\right)}, x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification96.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+116}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.86 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot z, \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.55 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, 2, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- x (/ y z))))
   (if (<= z -1.05e-24) t_1 (if (<= z 3.55e+84) (fma (/ z t) 2.0 x) t_1))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e-24) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 3.55e+84) {
		tmp = fma((z / t), 2.0, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.05e-24)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 3.55e+84)
		tmp = fma(Float64(z / t), 2.0, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.05e-24], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 3.55e+84], N[(N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.55 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, 2, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -1.05e-24 or 3.5499999999999999e84 < z

    1. Initial program 77.6%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-/.f6492.1

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites92.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

    if -1.05e-24 < z < 3.5499999999999999e84

    1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
      2. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{2} \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
      3. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{z}{t} + x} \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot 2} + x \]
      5. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, 2, x\right)} \]
      6. lower-/.f6489.3

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{z}{t}}, 2, x\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, 2, x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 88.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.55 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{2}{t}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- x (/ y z))))
   (if (<= z -1.05e-24) t_1 (if (<= z 3.55e+84) (fma z (/ 2.0 t) x) t_1))))
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x - (y / z);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e-24) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 3.55e+84) {
		tmp = fma(z, (2.0 / t), x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.05e-24)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 3.55e+84)
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(2.0 / t), x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.05e-24], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 3.55e+84], N[(z * N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_1 := x - \frac{y}{z}\\
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.55 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \frac{2}{t}, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -1.05e-24 or 3.5499999999999999e84 < z

    1. Initial program 77.6%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-/.f6492.1

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites92.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

    if -1.05e-24 < z < 3.5499999999999999e84

    1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right) \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
      2. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{2} \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]
      3. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{z}{t} + x} \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot 2} + x \]
      5. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, 2, x\right)} \]
      6. lower-/.f6489.3

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{z}{t}}, 2, x\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{z}{t}, 2, x\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites89.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}}, x\right) \]
    7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
    8. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 5: 63.9% accurate, 2.9× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{y}{z} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ y z)))
    double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
    	return x - (y / z);
    }
    
    real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        real(8), intent (in) :: z
        real(8), intent (in) :: t
        code = x - (y / z)
    end function
    
    public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
    	return x - (y / z);
    }
    
    def code(x, y, z, t):
    	return x - (y / z)
    
    function code(x, y, z, t)
    	return Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
    	tmp = x - (y / z);
    end
    
    code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    x - \frac{y}{z}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lower-/.f6467.1

        \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites67.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    6. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 6: 15.3% accurate, 3.1× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-y}{z} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (/ (- y) z))
    double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
    	return -y / z;
    }
    
    real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        real(8), intent (in) :: y
        real(8), intent (in) :: z
        real(8), intent (in) :: t
        code = -y / z
    end function
    
    public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
    	return -y / z;
    }
    
    def code(x, y, z, t):
    	return -y / z
    
    function code(x, y, z, t)
    	return Float64(Float64(-y) / z)
    end
    
    function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
    	tmp = -y / z;
    end
    
    code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[((-y) / z), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \frac{-y}{z}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift--.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} \]
      2. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right)} \]
      3. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)\right) + x} \]
      4. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}}\right)\right) + x \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)}} + x \]
      6. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      7. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right)} \cdot z}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      8. associate-*l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      9. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      10. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)} + x \]
      11. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)}} + x \]
      12. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot z, \frac{2}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t\right)\right)}, x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot y, \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, z \cdot z, t \cdot y\right)}, x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \frac{z}{-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y}\right)} \]
      2. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y}} \]
      3. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y}} \]
      4. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right)} \cdot \frac{z}{-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y} \]
      5. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y}} \]
      6. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot -2} + t \cdot y} \]
      7. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({z}^{2}, -2, t \cdot y\right)}} \]
      8. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot z}, -2, t \cdot y\right)} \]
      9. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot z}, -2, t \cdot y\right)} \]
      10. lower-*.f6420.1

        \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot z, -2, \color{blue}{t \cdot y}\right)} \]
    7. Applied rewrites20.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot z, -2, t \cdot y\right)}} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites17.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{-y}{\color{blue}{z}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (x y z t)
       :precision binary64
       (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))
      double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
      	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
      }
      
      real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
          real(8), intent (in) :: x
          real(8), intent (in) :: y
          real(8), intent (in) :: z
          real(8), intent (in) :: t
          code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
      end function
      
      public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
      	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
      }
      
      def code(x, y, z, t):
      	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))
      
      function code(x, y, z, t)
      	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
      end
      
      function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
      	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
      end
      
      code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}}
      \end{array}
      

      Reproduce

      ?
      herbie shell --seed 2024294 
      (FPCore (x y z t)
        :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
        :precision binary64
      
        :alt
        (! :herbie-platform default (- x (/ 1 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2) z)))))
      
        (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))