Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteBetaApprox from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 96.6% → 96.6%

Time: 7.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• Could not converge on a ground truth

  1. x = 1.2985649822549738e+305
  2. y = 2.720762922216355e-178
  3. z = 4.728641226619095e-205
  4. t = 1.7757585149805568e+133
  5. a = -2.5272088739114578e-23
  6. b = -7.096758580336812e+196

• 40.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (* x (exp (+ (* y (- (log z) t)) (* a (- (log (- 1.0 z)) b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * exp(((y * (log(z) - t)) + (a * (log((1.0 - z)) - b))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x * exp(((y * (log(z) - t)) + (a * (log((1.0d0 - z)) - b))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * Math.exp(((y * (Math.log(z) - t)) + (a * (Math.log((1.0 - z)) - b))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x * math.exp(((y * (math.log(z) - t)) + (a * (math.log((1.0 - z)) - b))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x * exp(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(log(z) - t)) + Float64(a * Float64(log(Float64(1.0 - z)) - b)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x * exp(((y * (log(z) - t)) + (a * (log((1.0 - z)) - b))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * N[Exp[N[(N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 96.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (* x (exp (+ (* y (- (log z) t)) (* a (- (log (- 1.0 z)) b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * exp(((y * (log(z) - t)) + (a * (log((1.0 - z)) - b))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x * exp(((y * (log(z) - t)) + (a * (log((1.0d0 - z)) - b))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * Math.exp(((y * (Math.log(z) - t)) + (a * (Math.log((1.0 - z)) - b))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x * math.exp(((y * (math.log(z) - t)) + (a * (math.log((1.0 - z)) - b))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x * exp(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(log(z) - t)) + Float64(a * Float64(log(Float64(1.0 - z)) - b)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x * exp(((y * (log(z) - t)) + (a * (log((1.0 - z)) - b))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * N[Exp[N[(N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ e^{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a + \left(\log z - t\right) \cdot y} \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (* (exp (+ (* (- (log (- 1.0 z)) b) a) (* (- (log z) t) y))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return exp((((log((1.0 - z)) - b) * a) + ((log(z) - t) * y))) * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp((((log((1.0d0 - z)) - b) * a) + ((log(z) - t) * y))) * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp((((Math.log((1.0 - z)) - b) * a) + ((Math.log(z) - t) * y))) * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return math.exp((((math.log((1.0 - z)) - b) * a) + ((math.log(z) - t) * y))) * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(Float64(log(Float64(1.0 - z)) - b) * a) + Float64(Float64(log(z) - t) * y))) * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = exp((((log((1.0 - z)) - b) * a) + ((log(z) - t) * y))) * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.7%

   \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto e^{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a + \left(\log z - t\right) \cdot y} \cdot x \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := {\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-23}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (pow (/ z (exp t)) y) x)))
   (if (<= y -1.25e-6)
     t_1
     (if (<= y 6.5e-23) (* (exp (* (- (- z) b) a)) x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = pow((z / exp(t)), y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.25e-6) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e-23) {
		tmp = exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = ((z / exp(t)) ** y) * x
    if (y <= (-1.25d-6)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 6.5d-23) then
        tmp = exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = Math.pow((z / Math.exp(t)), y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.25e-6) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e-23) {
		tmp = Math.exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = math.pow((z / math.exp(t)), y) * x
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.25e-6:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 6.5e-23:
		tmp = math.exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64((Float64(z / exp(t)) ^ y) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.25e-6)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 6.5e-23)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(Float64(-z) - b) * a)) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = ((z / exp(t)) ^ y) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.25e-6)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 6.5e-23)
		tmp = exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Power[N[(z / N[Exp[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.25e-6], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 6.5e-23], N[(N[Exp[N[(N[((-z) - b), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.2500000000000001e-6 or 6.5e-23 < y

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log z - t\right) \cdot y}} \]

      2. exp-prod N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

      3. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

      4. exp-diff N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\log z}}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

      5. rem-exp-log N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{z}}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \]

      6. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

      7. lower-exp.f64 88.8

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{z}{\color{blue}{e^{t}}}\right)}^{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y}} \]

   if -1.2500000000000001e-6 < y < 6.5e-23

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

      3. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \cdot a} \]

      4. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)\right)} - b\right) \cdot a} \]

      5. lower-log1p.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - b\right) \cdot a} \]

      6. lower-neg.f64 85.1

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-z}\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(-1 \cdot z - b\right) \cdot a} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 85.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.25 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-23}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 76.6% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := {z}^{y} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (pow z y) x)))
   (if (<= y -1.95e+34)
     t_1
     (if (<= y 9.2e+31) (* (exp (* (- (- z) b) a)) x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = pow(z, y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+34) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 9.2e+31) {
		tmp = exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z ** y) * x
    if (y <= (-1.95d+34)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 9.2d+31) then
        tmp = exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = Math.pow(z, y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+34) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 9.2e+31) {
		tmp = Math.exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = math.pow(z, y) * x
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.95e+34:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 9.2e+31:
		tmp = math.exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64((z ^ y) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.95e+34)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 9.2e+31)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(Float64(-z) - b) * a)) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z ^ y) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.95e+34)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 9.2e+31)
		tmp = exp(((-z - b) * a)) * x;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Power[z, y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.95e+34], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 9.2e+31], N[(N[Exp[N[(N[((-z) - b), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.9500000000000001e34 or 9.1999999999999998e31 < y

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log z - t\right) \cdot y}} \]

      2. exp-prod N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

      3. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

      4. exp-diff N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\log z}}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

      5. rem-exp-log N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{z}}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \]

      6. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

      7. lower-exp.f64 90.5

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{z}{\color{blue}{e^{t}}}\right)}^{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {z}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {z}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]

   if -1.9500000000000001e34 < y < 9.1999999999999998e31

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

      3. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \cdot a} \]

      4. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)\right)} - b\right) \cdot a} \]

      5. lower-log1p.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - b\right) \cdot a} \]

      6. lower-neg.f64 81.6

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-z}\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(-1 \cdot z - b\right) \cdot a} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 81.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;{z}^{y} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{z}^{y} \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 73.4% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := {z}^{y} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-b\right) \cdot a} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (pow z y) x)))
   (if (<= y -1.95e+34) t_1 (if (<= y 6.8e+31) (* (exp (* (- b) a)) x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = pow(z, y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+34) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 6.8e+31) {
		tmp = exp((-b * a)) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z ** y) * x
    if (y <= (-1.95d+34)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 6.8d+31) then
        tmp = exp((-b * a)) * x
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = Math.pow(z, y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+34) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 6.8e+31) {
		tmp = Math.exp((-b * a)) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = math.pow(z, y) * x
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.95e+34:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 6.8e+31:
		tmp = math.exp((-b * a)) * x
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64((z ^ y) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.95e+34)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 6.8e+31)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(-b) * a)) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z ^ y) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.95e+34)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 6.8e+31)
		tmp = exp((-b * a)) * x;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Power[z, y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.95e+34], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 6.8e+31], N[(N[Exp[N[((-b) * a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.9500000000000001e34 or 6.7999999999999996e31 < y

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log z - t\right) \cdot y}} \]

      2. exp-prod N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

      3. lower-pow.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

      4. exp-diff N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\log z}}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

      5. rem-exp-log N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{z}}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \]

      6. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

      7. lower-exp.f64 90.5

         \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{z}{\color{blue}{e^{t}}}\right)}^{y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 90.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {z}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {z}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]

   if -1.9500000000000001e34 < y < 6.7999999999999996e31

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

      3. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \cdot a} \]

      4. sub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)\right)} - b\right) \cdot a} \]

      5. lower-log1p.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - b\right) \cdot a} \]

      6. lower-neg.f64 81.6

         \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-z}\right) - b\right) \cdot a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(-z\right) - b\right) \cdot a}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 78.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\left(-b\right) \cdot \color{blue}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;{z}^{y} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+31}:\\ \;\;\;\;e^{\left(-b\right) \cdot a} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{z}^{y} \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 51.9% accurate, 3.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {z}^{y} \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* (pow z y) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return pow(z, y) * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = (z ** y) * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return Math.pow(z, y) * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return math.pow(z, y) * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64((z ^ y) * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = (z ^ y) * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[Power[z, y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.7%

   \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log z - t\right) \cdot y}} \]

   2. exp-prod N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

   3. lower-pow.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

   4. exp-diff N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\log z}}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

   5. rem-exp-log N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{z}}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \]

   6. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

   7. lower-exp.f64 70.0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{z}{\color{blue}{e^{t}}}\right)}^{y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 70.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto x \cdot {z}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 56.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot {z}^{\color{blue}{y}} \]

9. Final simplification 56.7%

   \[\leadsto {z}^{y} \cdot x \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 19.5% accurate, 54.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* 1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return 1.0 * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.7%

   \[x \cdot e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right) + a \cdot \left(\log \left(1 - z\right) - b\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{e^{y \cdot \left(\log z - t\right)}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(\log z - t\right) \cdot y}} \]

   2. exp-prod N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

   3. lower-pow.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(e^{\log z - t}\right)}^{y}} \]

   4. exp-diff N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\log z}}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

   5. rem-exp-log N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{z}}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y} \]

   6. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}}^{y} \]

   7. lower-exp.f64 70.0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot {\left(\frac{z}{\color{blue}{e^{t}}}\right)}^{y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 70.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{z}{e^{t}}\right)}^{y}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 1 \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 21.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 1 \]

9. Final simplification 21.1%

   \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024294 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteBetaApprox from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (* x (exp (+ (* y (- (log z) t)) (* a (- (log (- 1.0 z)) b))))))