Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 78.3% → 96.3%
Time: 8.4s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 55.2×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 78.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.3% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1 - wj}{x}, wj \cdot wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, 1\right)\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (fma
   (/ (- 1.0 wj) x)
   (* wj wj)
   (fma (fma (fma -2.6666666666666665 wj 2.5) wj -2.0) wj 1.0))
  x))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return fma(((1.0 - wj) / x), (wj * wj), fma(fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), wj, -2.0), wj, 1.0)) * x;
}
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(fma(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) / x), Float64(wj * wj), fma(fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), wj, -2.0), wj, 1.0)) * x)
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(-2.6666666666666665 * wj + 2.5), $MachinePrecision] * wj + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1 - wj}{x}, wj \cdot wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, 1\right)\right) \cdot x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 80.9%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites96.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in x around inf

    \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right) + \frac{{wj}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1 - wj}{x}, wj \cdot wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, 1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 2: 96.3% accurate, 10.0× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (wj x)
     :precision binary64
     (fma
      (fma (fma (fma -2.6666666666666665 wj 2.5) x (- 1.0 wj)) wj (* -2.0 x))
      wj
      x))
    double code(double wj, double x) {
    	return fma(fma(fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), x, (1.0 - wj)), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
    }
    
    function code(wj, x)
    	return fma(fma(fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), x, Float64(1.0 - wj)), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
    end
    
    code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-2.6666666666666665 * wj + 2.5), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 80.9%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right)\right) - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites97.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 3: 95.6% accurate, 22.1× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* (- 1.0 wj) wj) wj x))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return fma(((1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x);
      }
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	return fma(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x)
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 80.9%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
      4. Applied rewrites96.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
      5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 + x \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right)\right) - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites97.3%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites96.8%

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
          2. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 4: 85.0% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* x wj) -2.0 x))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return fma((x * wj), -2.0, x);
          }
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return fma(Float64(x * wj), -2.0, x)
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 80.9%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
            2. *-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right) \cdot -2} + x \]
            3. lower-fma.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
            4. *-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot wj}, -2, x\right) \]
            5. lower-*.f6485.7

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot wj}, -2, x\right) \]
          5. Applied rewrites85.7%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)} \]
          6. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 5: 85.0% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* (fma -2.0 wj 1.0) x))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x;
          }
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return Float64(fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x)
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(-2.0 * wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 80.9%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
          4. Applied rewrites96.9%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
          5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
          6. Step-by-step derivation
            1. associate-*r*N/A

              \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} \]
            2. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
            3. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -2 \cdot wj\right)} \cdot x \]
            4. lower-*.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} \]
            5. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj + 1\right)} \cdot x \]
            6. lower-fma.f6485.7

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
          7. Applied rewrites85.7%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
          8. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 6: 84.5% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \cdot x \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* 1.0 x))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return 1.0 * x;
          }
          
          real(8) function code(wj, x)
              real(8), intent (in) :: wj
              real(8), intent (in) :: x
              code = 1.0d0 * x
          end function
          
          public static double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return 1.0 * x;
          }
          
          def code(wj, x):
          	return 1.0 * x
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return Float64(1.0 * x)
          end
          
          function tmp = code(wj, x)
          	tmp = 1.0 * x;
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          1 \cdot x
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 80.9%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
          4. Applied rewrites96.9%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
          5. Taylor expanded in x around inf

            \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right) + \frac{{wj}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]
          6. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites97.6%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1 - wj}{x}, wj \cdot wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, 1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
            2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

              \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites85.3%

                \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
              2. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 7: 13.6% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj \cdot wj \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* wj wj))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return wj * wj;
              }
              
              real(8) function code(wj, x)
                  real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                  real(8), intent (in) :: x
                  code = wj * wj
              end function
              
              public static double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return wj * wj;
              }
              
              def code(wj, x):
              	return wj * wj
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return Float64(wj * wj)
              end
              
              function tmp = code(wj, x)
              	tmp = wj * wj;
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              wj \cdot wj
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 80.9%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
              4. Step-by-step derivation
                1. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
                2. *-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj} + x \]
                3. lower-fma.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x, wj, x\right)} \]
                4. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot x}, wj, x\right) \]
                5. metadata-evalN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x, wj, x\right) \]
                6. *-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot wj} + -2 \cdot x, wj, x\right) \]
                7. lower-fma.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right)}, wj, x\right) \]
                8. sub-negN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)}, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                9. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right)\right) + 1}, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                10. distribute-rgt-outN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)\right) + 1, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                11. *-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right) \cdot x}\right)\right) + 1, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                12. distribute-lft-neg-inN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right)\right)\right) \cdot x} + 1, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                13. lower-fma.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right)\right), x, 1\right)}, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                14. metadata-evalN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-5}{2}}\right), x, 1\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                15. metadata-evalN/A

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{5}{2}}, x, 1\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                16. lower-*.f6496.5

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right), wj, \color{blue}{-2 \cdot x}\right), wj, x\right) \]
              5. Applied rewrites96.5%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
              6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                \[\leadsto {wj}^{\color{blue}{2}} \]
              7. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites13.8%

                  \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing

                Alternative 8: 4.3% accurate, 82.8× speedup?

                \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + wj \end{array} \]
                (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 wj))
                double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return -1.0 + wj;
                }
                
                real(8) function code(wj, x)
                    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                    real(8), intent (in) :: x
                    code = (-1.0d0) + wj
                end function
                
                public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return -1.0 + wj;
                }
                
                def code(wj, x):
                	return -1.0 + wj
                
                function code(wj, x)
                	return Float64(-1.0 + wj)
                end
                
                function tmp = code(wj, x)
                	tmp = -1.0 + wj;
                end
                
                code[wj_, x_] := N[(-1.0 + wj), $MachinePrecision]
                
                \begin{array}{l}
                
                \\
                -1 + wj
                \end{array}
                
                Derivation
                1. Initial program 80.9%

                  \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing
                3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
                4. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. sub-negN/A

                    \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
                  2. +-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + 1\right)} \]
                  3. distribute-lft-inN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1} \]
                  4. distribute-rgt-neg-outN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(wj \cdot \frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                  5. rgt-mult-inverseN/A

                    \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1 \]
                  6. metadata-evalN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                  7. *-rgt-identityN/A

                    \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{wj} \]
                  8. lower-+.f643.8

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
                5. Applied rewrites3.8%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
                6. Add Preprocessing

                Alternative 9: 3.9% accurate, 110.3× speedup?

                \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -wj \end{array} \]
                (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (- wj))
                double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return -wj;
                }
                
                real(8) function code(wj, x)
                    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                    real(8), intent (in) :: x
                    code = -wj
                end function
                
                public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return -wj;
                }
                
                def code(wj, x):
                	return -wj
                
                function code(wj, x)
                	return Float64(-wj)
                end
                
                function tmp = code(wj, x)
                	tmp = -wj;
                end
                
                code[wj_, x_] := (-wj)
                
                \begin{array}{l}
                
                \\
                -wj
                \end{array}
                
                Derivation
                1. Initial program 80.9%

                  \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing
                3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
                4. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. sub-negN/A

                    \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
                  2. +-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + 1\right)} \]
                  3. distribute-lft-inN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1} \]
                  4. distribute-rgt-neg-outN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(wj \cdot \frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                  5. rgt-mult-inverseN/A

                    \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1 \]
                  6. metadata-evalN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                  7. *-rgt-identityN/A

                    \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{wj} \]
                  8. lower-+.f643.8

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
                5. Applied rewrites3.8%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
                6. Applied rewrites3.3%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 - wj} \]
                7. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                  \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
                8. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. Applied rewrites3.7%

                    \[\leadsto -wj \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing

                  Alternative 10: 3.4% accurate, 331.0× speedup?

                  \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]
                  (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 -1.0)
                  double code(double wj, double x) {
                  	return -1.0;
                  }
                  
                  real(8) function code(wj, x)
                      real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                      real(8), intent (in) :: x
                      code = -1.0d0
                  end function
                  
                  public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                  	return -1.0;
                  }
                  
                  def code(wj, x):
                  	return -1.0
                  
                  function code(wj, x)
                  	return -1.0
                  end
                  
                  function tmp = code(wj, x)
                  	tmp = -1.0;
                  end
                  
                  code[wj_, x_] := -1.0
                  
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  
                  \\
                  -1
                  \end{array}
                  
                  Derivation
                  1. Initial program 80.9%

                    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing
                  3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{wj}\right)} \]
                  4. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. sub-negN/A

                      \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)\right)} \]
                    2. +-commutativeN/A

                      \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + 1\right)} \]
                    3. distribute-lft-inN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{wj}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1} \]
                    4. distribute-rgt-neg-outN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(wj \cdot \frac{1}{wj}\right)\right)} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                    5. rgt-mult-inverseN/A

                      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) + wj \cdot 1 \]
                    6. metadata-evalN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + wj \cdot 1 \]
                    7. *-rgt-identityN/A

                      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{wj} \]
                    8. lower-+.f643.8

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
                  5. Applied rewrites3.8%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + wj} \]
                  6. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                    \[\leadsto -1 \]
                  7. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. Applied rewrites3.4%

                      \[\leadsto -1 \]
                    2. Add Preprocessing

                    Developer Target 1: 79.3% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

                    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
                    (FPCore (wj x)
                     :precision binary64
                     (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
                    double code(double wj, double x) {
                    	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                    }
                    
                    real(8) function code(wj, x)
                        real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                        real(8), intent (in) :: x
                        code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
                    end function
                    
                    public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                    	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
                    }
                    
                    def code(wj, x):
                    	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
                    
                    function code(wj, x)
                    	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
                    end
                    
                    function tmp = code(wj, x)
                    	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                    end
                    
                    code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
                    
                    \begin{array}{l}
                    
                    \\
                    wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
                    \end{array}
                    

                    Reproduce

                    ?
                    herbie shell --seed 2024288 
                    (FPCore (wj x)
                      :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
                      :precision binary64
                    
                      :alt
                      (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
                    
                      (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))