ENA, Section 1.4, Mentioned, B

Percentage Accurate: 87.8% → 99.6%
Time: 7.1s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 1.1×

Specification

?
\[0.999 \leq x \land x \leq 1.001\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 10.0 (- 1.0 (* x x))))
double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 10.0d0 / (1.0d0 - (x * x))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
def code(x):
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))
function code(x)
	return Float64(10.0 / Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x)))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
end
code[x_] := N[(10.0 / N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 87.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 10.0 (- 1.0 (* x x))))
double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 10.0d0 / (1.0d0 - (x * x))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
def code(x):
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))
function code(x)
	return Float64(10.0 / Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x)))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
end
code[x_] := N[(10.0 / N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ -10.0 (fma x x -1.0)))
double code(double x) {
	return -10.0 / fma(x, x, -1.0);
}
function code(x)
	return Float64(-10.0 / fma(x, x, -1.0))
end
code[x_] := N[(-10.0 / N[(x * x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 87.3%

    \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Applied rewrites99.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 13.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;10\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ 10.0 (- 1.0 (* x x))) -2e-310) -10.0 10.0))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))) <= -2e-310) {
		tmp = -10.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 10.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((10.0d0 / (1.0d0 - (x * x))) <= (-2d-310)) then
        tmp = -10.0d0
    else
        tmp = 10.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))) <= -2e-310) {
		tmp = -10.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 10.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))) <= -2e-310:
		tmp = -10.0
	else:
		tmp = 10.0
	return tmp
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(10.0 / Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x))) <= -2e-310)
		tmp = -10.0;
	else
		tmp = 10.0;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))) <= -2e-310)
		tmp = -10.0;
	else
		tmp = 10.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(10.0 / N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -2e-310], -10.0, 10.0]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\
\;\;\;\;-10\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;10\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x x))) < -1.999999999999994e-310

    1. Initial program 86.4%

      \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites1.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)\right)}^{-0.5}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites13.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]

      if -1.999999999999994e-310 < (/.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) (-.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 x x)))

      1. Initial program 87.9%

        \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites13.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]
      5. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      6. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 3: 13.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, x \cdot x, -10\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (x)
       :precision binary64
       (if (<= (* x x) 1.0) (fma (* x x) 10.0 10.0) (fma -10.0 (* x x) -10.0)))
      double code(double x) {
      	double tmp;
      	if ((x * x) <= 1.0) {
      		tmp = fma((x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
      	} else {
      		tmp = fma(-10.0, (x * x), -10.0);
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      function code(x)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (Float64(x * x) <= 1.0)
      		tmp = fma(Float64(x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
      	else
      		tmp = fma(-10.0, Float64(x * x), -10.0);
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 1.0], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] * 10.0 + 10.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + -10.0), $MachinePrecision]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\
      \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, x \cdot x, -10\right)\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if (*.f64 x x) < 1

        1. Initial program 87.9%

          \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 + 10 \cdot {x}^{2}} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 \cdot {x}^{2} + 10} \]
          2. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot 10} + 10 \]
          3. lower-fma.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{2}, 10, 10\right)} \]
          4. unpow2N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
          5. lower-*.f6413.7

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
        5. Applied rewrites13.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)} \]

        if 1 < (*.f64 x x)

        1. Initial program 86.4%

          \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Applied rewrites1.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)\right)}^{-0.5}} \]
        4. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot {x}^{2} - 10} \]
        5. Step-by-step derivation
          1. sub-negN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot {x}^{2} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(10\right)\right)} \]
          2. metadata-evalN/A

            \[\leadsto -10 \cdot {x}^{2} + \color{blue}{-10} \]
          3. lower-fma.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, {x}^{2}, -10\right)} \]
          4. unpow2N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-10, \color{blue}{x \cdot x}, -10\right) \]
          5. lower-*.f6413.7

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-10, \color{blue}{x \cdot x}, -10\right) \]
        6. Applied rewrites13.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, x \cdot x, -10\right)} \]
      3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      4. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 4: 13.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (x)
       :precision binary64
       (if (<= (* x x) 1.0) (fma (* x x) 10.0 10.0) -10.0))
      double code(double x) {
      	double tmp;
      	if ((x * x) <= 1.0) {
      		tmp = fma((x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
      	} else {
      		tmp = -10.0;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      function code(x)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (Float64(x * x) <= 1.0)
      		tmp = fma(Float64(x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
      	else
      		tmp = -10.0;
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 1.0], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] * 10.0 + 10.0), $MachinePrecision], -10.0]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\
      \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;-10\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if (*.f64 x x) < 1

        1. Initial program 87.9%

          \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 + 10 \cdot {x}^{2}} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. +-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 \cdot {x}^{2} + 10} \]
          2. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot 10} + 10 \]
          3. lower-fma.f64N/A

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{2}, 10, 10\right)} \]
          4. unpow2N/A

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
          5. lower-*.f6413.7

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
        5. Applied rewrites13.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)} \]

        if 1 < (*.f64 x x)

        1. Initial program 86.4%

          \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Applied rewrites1.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)\right)}^{-0.5}} \]
        4. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]
        5. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites13.5%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]
        6. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
        7. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 5: 9.5% accurate, 20.0× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 10 \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (x) :precision binary64 10.0)
        double code(double x) {
        	return 10.0;
        }
        
        real(8) function code(x)
            real(8), intent (in) :: x
            code = 10.0d0
        end function
        
        public static double code(double x) {
        	return 10.0;
        }
        
        def code(x):
        	return 10.0
        
        function code(x)
        	return 10.0
        end
        
        function tmp = code(x)
        	tmp = 10.0;
        end
        
        code[x_] := 10.0
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        10
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 87.3%

          \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites8.4%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing

          Reproduce

          ?
          herbie shell --seed 2024288 
          (FPCore (x)
            :name "ENA, Section 1.4, Mentioned, B"
            :precision binary64
            :pre (and (<= 0.999 x) (<= x 1.001))
            (/ 10.0 (- 1.0 (* x x))))