expq3 (problem 3.4.2)

Percentage Accurate: 0.0% → 99.8%
Time: 26.2s
Alternatives: 4
Speedup: 29.1×

Specification

?
\[\left(\left|a\right| \leq 710 \land \left|b\right| \leq 710\right) \land \left(10^{-27} \cdot \mathsf{min}\left(\left|a\right|, \left|b\right|\right) \leq \varepsilon \land \varepsilon \leq \mathsf{min}\left(\left|a\right|, \left|b\right|\right)\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 4 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 0.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 13.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} [a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\ \\ \frac{\frac{b + a}{a}}{b} \end{array} \]
NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ (/ (+ b a) a) b))
assert(a < b && b < eps);
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return ((b + a) / a) / b;
}
NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = ((b + a) / a) / b
end function
assert a < b && b < eps;
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return ((b + a) / a) / b;
}
[a, b, eps] = sort([a, b, eps])
def code(a, b, eps):
	return ((b + a) / a) / b
a, b, eps = sort([a, b, eps])
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(b + a) / a) / b)
end
a, b, eps = num2cell(sort([a, b, eps])){:}
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = ((b + a) / a) / b;
end
NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(N[(b + a), $MachinePrecision] / a), $MachinePrecision] / b), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}
[a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\
\\
\frac{\frac{b + a}{a}}{b}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 0.0%

    \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in eps around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{a + b}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]
    2. associate-/r*N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]
    3. lower-/.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]
    4. lower-/.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{b}}}{a} \]
    5. +-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]
    6. lower-+.f6499.8

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]
  5. Applied rewrites99.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{b + a}{b}}{a}} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{a}}{b}} \]
    2. Final simplification99.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{b + a}{a}}{b} \]
    3. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 13.4× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} [a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\ \\ \frac{\frac{a}{b} + 1}{a} \end{array} \]
    NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
    (FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ (+ (/ a b) 1.0) a))
    assert(a < b && b < eps);
    double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
    	return ((a / b) + 1.0) / a;
    }
    
    NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
    real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
        real(8), intent (in) :: a
        real(8), intent (in) :: b
        real(8), intent (in) :: eps
        code = ((a / b) + 1.0d0) / a
    end function
    
    assert a < b && b < eps;
    public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
    	return ((a / b) + 1.0) / a;
    }
    
    [a, b, eps] = sort([a, b, eps])
    def code(a, b, eps):
    	return ((a / b) + 1.0) / a
    
    a, b, eps = sort([a, b, eps])
    function code(a, b, eps)
    	return Float64(Float64(Float64(a / b) + 1.0) / a)
    end
    
    a, b, eps = num2cell(sort([a, b, eps])){:}
    function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
    	tmp = ((a / b) + 1.0) / a;
    end
    
    NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
    code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(N[(a / b), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / a), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    [a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\
    \\
    \frac{\frac{a}{b} + 1}{a}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in eps around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{a + b}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]
      2. associate-/r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]
      3. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]
      4. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{b}}}{a} \]
      5. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]
      6. lower-+.f6499.8

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]
    5. Applied rewrites99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{b + a}{b}}{a}} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \frac{a}{b}}{a} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites99.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{a}{b} + 1}{a} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 3: 81.3% accurate, 19.4× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} [a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-182}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
      (FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (if (<= b 3.6e-182) (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))
      assert(a < b && b < eps);
      double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (b <= 3.6e-182) {
      		tmp = 1.0 / b;
      	} else {
      		tmp = 1.0 / a;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
      real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
          real(8), intent (in) :: a
          real(8), intent (in) :: b
          real(8), intent (in) :: eps
          real(8) :: tmp
          if (b <= 3.6d-182) then
              tmp = 1.0d0 / b
          else
              tmp = 1.0d0 / a
          end if
          code = tmp
      end function
      
      assert a < b && b < eps;
      public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (b <= 3.6e-182) {
      		tmp = 1.0 / b;
      	} else {
      		tmp = 1.0 / a;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      [a, b, eps] = sort([a, b, eps])
      def code(a, b, eps):
      	tmp = 0
      	if b <= 3.6e-182:
      		tmp = 1.0 / b
      	else:
      		tmp = 1.0 / a
      	return tmp
      
      a, b, eps = sort([a, b, eps])
      function code(a, b, eps)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (b <= 3.6e-182)
      		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
      	else
      		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      a, b, eps = num2cell(sort([a, b, eps])){:}
      function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
      	tmp = 0.0;
      	if (b <= 3.6e-182)
      		tmp = 1.0 / b;
      	else
      		tmp = 1.0 / a;
      	end
      	tmp_2 = tmp;
      end
      
      NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
      code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[b, 3.6e-182], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      [a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-182}:\\
      \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if b < 3.59999999999999977e-182

        1. Initial program 0.0%

          \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lower-/.f6458.9

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]
        5. Applied rewrites58.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

        if 3.59999999999999977e-182 < b

        1. Initial program 0.0%

          \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. lower-/.f6469.4

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
        5. Applied rewrites69.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
      3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      4. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 4: 50.3% accurate, 29.1× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} [a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\ \\ \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]
      NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
      (FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 a))
      assert(a < b && b < eps);
      double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
      	return 1.0 / a;
      }
      
      NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
      real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
          real(8), intent (in) :: a
          real(8), intent (in) :: b
          real(8), intent (in) :: eps
          code = 1.0d0 / a
      end function
      
      assert a < b && b < eps;
      public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
      	return 1.0 / a;
      }
      
      [a, b, eps] = sort([a, b, eps])
      def code(a, b, eps):
      	return 1.0 / a
      
      a, b, eps = sort([a, b, eps])
      function code(a, b, eps)
      	return Float64(1.0 / a)
      end
      
      a, b, eps = num2cell(sort([a, b, eps])){:}
      function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
      	tmp = 1.0 / a;
      end
      
      NOTE: a, b, and eps should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
      code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      [a, b, eps] = \mathsf{sort}([a, b, eps])\\
      \\
      \frac{1}{a}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 0.0%

        \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. lower-/.f6449.0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
      5. Applied rewrites49.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
      6. Add Preprocessing

      Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 13.4× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 a) (/ 1.0 b)))
      double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
      	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
      }
      
      real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
          real(8), intent (in) :: a
          real(8), intent (in) :: b
          real(8), intent (in) :: eps
          code = (1.0d0 / a) + (1.0d0 / b)
      end function
      
      public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
      	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
      }
      
      def code(a, b, eps):
      	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b)
      
      function code(a, b, eps)
      	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(1.0 / b))
      end
      
      function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
      	tmp = (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
      end
      
      code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b}
      \end{array}
      

      Reproduce

      ?
      herbie shell --seed 2024278 
      (FPCore (a b eps)
        :name "expq3 (problem 3.4.2)"
        :precision binary64
        :pre (and (and (<= (fabs a) 710.0) (<= (fabs b) 710.0)) (and (<= (* 1e-27 (fmin (fabs a) (fabs b))) eps) (<= eps (fmin (fabs a) (fabs b)))))
      
        :alt
        (! :herbie-platform default (+ (/ 1 a) (/ 1 b)))
      
        (/ (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0)) (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))