Kahan p13 Example 2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.5s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{2 + t\_2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ 2.0 t_2))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (2.0d0 + t_2)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(2.0 + t_2))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (2.0 + t_2);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ t_2 := t\_1 \cdot t\_1\\ \frac{1 + t\_2}{t\_2 + 2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))) (t_2 (* t_1 t_1)))
   (/ (+ 1.0 t_2) (+ t_2 2.0))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (t_2 + 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    t_2 = t_1 * t_1
    code = (1.0d0 + t_2) / (t_2 + 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	double t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (t_2 + 2.0);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1
	return (1.0 + t_2) / (t_2 + 2.0)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	t_2 = Float64(t_1 * t_1)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + t_2) / Float64(t_2 + 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	t_2 = t_1 * t_1;
	tmp = (1.0 + t_2) / (t_2 + 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + t$95$2), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$2 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) + 2} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\\ \frac{1 + t\_1 \cdot t\_1}{\left(2 - \frac{2}{t}\right) \cdot t\_1 + 2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))))
   (/ (+ 1.0 (* t_1 t_1)) (+ (* (- 2.0 (/ 2.0 t)) t_1) 2.0))))

C

double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	return (1.0 + (t_1 * t_1)) / (((2.0 - (2.0 / t)) * t_1) + 2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    t_1 = 2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))
    code = (1.0d0 + (t_1 * t_1)) / (((2.0d0 - (2.0d0 / t)) * t_1) + 2.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	return (1.0 + (t_1 * t_1)) / (((2.0 - (2.0 / t)) * t_1) + 2.0);
}

Python

def code(t):
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))
	return (1.0 + (t_1 * t_1)) / (((2.0 - (2.0 / t)) * t_1) + 2.0)

Julia

function code(t)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))))
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(t_1 * t_1)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 - Float64(2.0 / t)) * t_1) + 2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	t_1 = 2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)));
	tmp = (1.0 + (t_1 * t_1)) / (((2.0 - (2.0 / t)) * t_1) + 2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(1.0 + N[(t$95$1 * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(2.0 - N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 98.1

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}}\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}}\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\left(2 - \frac{2}{t}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) + 2} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.2% accurate, 2.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222 - \frac{0.037037037037037035 + \frac{0.04938271604938271}{t}}{t}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) 0.5)
   (-
    0.8333333333333334
    (/
     (-
      0.2222222222222222
      (/ (+ 0.037037037037037035 (/ 0.04938271604938271 t)) t))
     t))
   0.5))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - ((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t))) <= 0.5d0) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0 - ((0.2222222222222222d0 - ((0.037037037037037035d0 + (0.04938271604938271d0 / t)) / t)) / t)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - ((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - ((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))) <= 0.5)
		tmp = Float64(0.8333333333333334 - Float64(Float64(0.2222222222222222 - Float64(Float64(0.037037037037037035 + Float64(0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t)) / t));
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - ((0.037037037037037035 + (0.04938271604938271 / t)) / t)) / t);
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], N[(0.8333333333333334 - N[(N[(0.2222222222222222 - N[(N[(0.037037037037037035 + N[(0.04938271604938271 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around -inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} + -1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{9} + -1 \cdot \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\frac{2}{9} + -1 \cdot \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} + -1 \cdot \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}{t}} \]

      3. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} + -1 \cdot \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}{t}} \]

      4. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} + -1 \cdot \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}{t}} \]

      5. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      6. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}}{t} \]

      7. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}}{t} \]

      8. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{27} + \frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}}}{t} \]

      9. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \frac{1}{27}}}{t}}{t} \]

      10. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{4}{81} \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \frac{1}{27}}}{t}}{t} \]

      11. associate-*r/ N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{4}{81} \cdot 1}{t}} + \frac{1}{27}}{t}}{t} \]

      12. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{4}{81}}}{t} + \frac{1}{27}}{t}}{t} \]

      13. lower-/.f64 99.4

          \[\leadsto 0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222 - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{0.04938271604938271}{t}} + 0.037037037037037035}{t}}{t} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222 - \frac{\frac{0.04938271604938271}{t} + 0.037037037037037035}{t}}{t}} \]

   if 0.5 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222 - \frac{0.037037037037037035 + \frac{0.04938271604938271}{t}}{t}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.2% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222 - \frac{0.037037037037037035}{t}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) 0.5)
   (-
    0.8333333333333334
    (/ (- 0.2222222222222222 (/ 0.037037037037037035 t)) t))
   0.5))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - (0.037037037037037035 / t)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t))) <= 0.5d0) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0 - ((0.2222222222222222d0 - (0.037037037037037035d0 / t)) / t)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - (0.037037037037037035 / t)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - (0.037037037037037035 / t)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))) <= 0.5)
		tmp = Float64(0.8333333333333334 - Float64(Float64(0.2222222222222222 - Float64(0.037037037037037035 / t)) / t));
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - ((0.2222222222222222 - (0.037037037037037035 / t)) / t);
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], N[(0.8333333333333334 - N[(N[(0.2222222222222222 - N[(0.037037037037037035 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{5}{6} + \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right) - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}} + \frac{5}{6}\right)} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t} \]

      2. associate--l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}} + \left(\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}\right) + \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}} \]

      4. associate--r- N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right)} \]

      5. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} \cdot 1}{t}} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{9}}}{t} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{{t}^{2}}\right) \]

      7. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \frac{\frac{1}{27}}{\color{blue}{t \cdot t}}\right) \]

      8. associate-/r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\frac{1}{27}}{t}}{t}}\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{27} \cdot 1}}{t}}{t}\right) \]

      10. associate-*r/ N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \left(\frac{\frac{2}{9}}{t} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}}{t}\right) \]

      11. div-sub N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}} \]

      12. lower--.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}} \]

      13. lower-/.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}{t}} \]

      14. lower--.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{1}{27} \cdot \frac{1}{t}}}{t} \]

      15. associate-*r/ N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{27} \cdot 1}{t}}}{t} \]

      16. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\frac{2}{9} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{27}}}{t}}{t} \]

      17. lower-/.f64 99.2

          \[\leadsto 0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222 - \color{blue}{\frac{0.037037037037037035}{t}}}{t} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222 - \frac{0.037037037037037035}{t}}{t}} \]

   if 0.5 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.1% accurate, 3.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))) 0.5)
   (- 0.8333333333333334 (/ 0.2222222222222222 t))
   0.5))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t))) <= 0.5d0) then
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0 - (0.2222222222222222d0 / t)
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5) {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t)
	else:
		tmp = 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t))) <= 0.5)
		tmp = Float64(0.8333333333333334 - Float64(0.2222222222222222 / t));
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t))) <= 0.5)
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334 - (0.2222222222222222 / t);
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5], N[(0.8333333333333334 - N[(0.2222222222222222 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))) < 0.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6} - \frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{1}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{9} \cdot 1}{t}} \]

      3. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{5}{6} - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{9}}}{t} \]

      4. lower-/.f64 98.8

         \[\leadsto 0.8333333333333334 - \color{blue}{\frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334 - \frac{0.2222222222222222}{t}} \]

   if 0.5 < (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 98.5% accurate, 4.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}} \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.8333333333333334\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) 1.0) 0.5 0.8333333333333334))

C

double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((2.0d0 - ((2.0d0 / t) / (1.0d0 + (1.0d0 / t)))) <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = 0.8333333333333334d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(t):
	tmp = 0
	if (2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))) <= 1.0:
		tmp = 0.5
	else:
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334
	return tmp

Julia

function code(t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(2.0 - Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / t)))) <= 1.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((2.0 - ((2.0 / t) / (1.0 + (1.0 / t)))) <= 1.0)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 0.8333333333333334;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(2.0 - N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1.0], 0.5, 0.8333333333333334]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t)))) < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]

   if 1 < (-.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) (/.f64 (/.f64 #s(literal 2 binary64) t) (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (/.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) t))))

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 17.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{5}{6}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.8333333333333334} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 59.4% accurate, 184.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (t) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double t) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double t) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(t):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(t)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(t)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[t_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{2 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

5. Applied rewrites 56.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right) \cdot \left(2 - \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{1 + \frac{1}{t}}\right)}{\color{blue}{2}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 57.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024276 
(FPCore (t)
  :name "Kahan p13 Example 2"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (+ 1.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))))) (+ 2.0 (* (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t)))) (- 2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 t) (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 t))))))))