Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.9s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.3% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot \left(y - x\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* z (- y x)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * (y - x)) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z * (y - x)) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z * (y - x)) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z * (y - x)) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y - x)) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z * (y - x)) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y - x\right) + x \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 58.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+257}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-165}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.7e+257)
   (* (- x) z)
   (if (<= z -3.1e-165) (* z y) (if (<= z 8.5e-52) (* 1.0 x) (* z y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.7e+257) {
		tmp = -x * z;
	} else if (z <= -3.1e-165) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 8.5e-52) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.7d+257)) then
        tmp = -x * z
    else if (z <= (-3.1d-165)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (z <= 8.5d-52) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.7e+257) {
		tmp = -x * z;
	} else if (z <= -3.1e-165) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 8.5e-52) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.7e+257:
		tmp = -x * z
	elif z <= -3.1e-165:
		tmp = z * y
	elif z <= 8.5e-52:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.7e+257)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-x) * z);
	elseif (z <= -3.1e-165)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 8.5e-52)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.7e+257)
		tmp = -x * z;
	elseif (z <= -3.1e-165)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (z <= 8.5e-52)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.7e+257], N[((-x) * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e-165], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 8.5e-52], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -3.69999999999999991e257

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. lower--.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-x\right) \cdot z \]

   if -3.69999999999999991e257 < z < -3.09999999999999996e-165 or 8.50000000000000006e-52 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 55.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.09999999999999996e-165 < z < 8.50000000000000006e-52

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 79.7

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -28.5:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* z (- y x))))
   (if (<= z -28.5) t_0 (if (<= z 1.0) (+ (* z y) x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -28.5) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (z * y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z * (y - x)
    if (z <= (-28.5d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = (z * y) + x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -28.5) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (z * y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z * (y - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -28.5:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 1.0:
		tmp = (z * y) + x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z * Float64(y - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -28.5)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z * (y - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -28.5)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 1.0)
		tmp = (z * y) + x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -28.5], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 1.0], N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -28.5 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. lower--.f64 99.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -28.5 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 98.7

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -28.5:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 81.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* z (- y x))))
   (if (<= z -1.02e-190) t_0 (if (<= z 2.0) (* (- 1.0 z) x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.02e-190) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 2.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z * (y - x)
    if (z <= (-1.02d-190)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 2.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.02e-190) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 2.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z * (y - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.02e-190:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 2.0:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z * Float64(y - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.02e-190)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 2.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z * (y - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.02e-190)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 2.0)
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.02e-190], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 2.0], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.02e-190 or 2 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. lower--.f64 93.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -1.02e-190 < z < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 77.7

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-76}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.4 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- 1.0 z) x)))
   (if (<= x -1.8e-76) t_0 (if (<= x 7.4e-9) (* z y) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 - z) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.8e-76) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 7.4e-9) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    if (x <= (-1.8d-76)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 7.4d-9) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 - z) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.8e-76) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 7.4e-9) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (1.0 - z) * x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.8e-76:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 7.4e-9:
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.8e-76)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 7.4e-9)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (1.0 - z) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.8e-76)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 7.4e-9)
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.8e-76], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 7.4e-9], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.8e-76 or 7.4e-9 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 85.5

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.8e-76 < x < 7.4e-9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 73.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 58.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{-165}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.1e-165) (* z y) (if (<= z 8.5e-52) (* 1.0 x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e-165) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 8.5e-52) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.1d-165)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (z <= 8.5d-52) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.1e-165) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 8.5e-52) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.1e-165:
		tmp = z * y
	elif z <= 8.5e-52:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.1e-165)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 8.5e-52)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.1e-165)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (z <= 8.5e-52)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.1e-165], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 8.5e-52], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.09999999999999996e-165 or 8.50000000000000006e-52 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 53.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -3.09999999999999996e-165 < z < 8.50000000000000006e-52

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 79.7

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 79.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 41.7% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 44.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 44.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024276 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* (- y x) z)))