Logistic regression 2

Percentage Accurate: 99.3% → 99.3%

Time: 5.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = 5.445176643290859e+151
  2. y = -1.4845873741533313e-266

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(-y, x, \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (fma (- y) x (log1p (exp x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return fma(-y, x, log1p(exp(x)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return fma(Float64(-y), x, log1p(exp(x)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[((-y) * x + N[Log[1 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift--.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   2. sub-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right) + \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)} \]

   4. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) + \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) \]

   5. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) + \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} + \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) \]

   7. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right), x, \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)\right)} \]

   8. lower-neg.f64 99.6

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{-y}, x, \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)\right) \]

   9. lift-log.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-y, x, \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)}\right) \]

   10. lift-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-y, x, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + e^{x}\right)}\right) \]

   11. lower-log1p.f64 99.6

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-y, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)}\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-y, x, \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y\\ t_1 := x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_0 \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y))) (t_1 (* x (- y))))
   (if (<= t_0 0.1) t_1 (if (<= t_0 1.0) (log1p (+ 1.0 x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	double t_1 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 0.1) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_0 <= 1.0) {
		tmp = log1p((1.0 + x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
	double t_1 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 0.1) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_0 <= 1.0) {
		tmp = Math.log1p((1.0 + x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	t_0 = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)
	t_1 = x * -y
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 0.1:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t_0 <= 1.0:
		tmp = math.log1p((1.0 + x))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	t_0 = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
	t_1 = Float64(x * Float64(-y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 0.1)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_0 <= 1.0)
		tmp = log1p(Float64(1.0 + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 0.1], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 1.0], N[Log[1 + N[(1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (log.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 x))) (*.f64 x y)) < 0.10000000000000001 or 1 < (-.f64 (log.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 x))) (*.f64 x y))

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 96.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if 0.10000000000000001 < (-.f64 (log.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 x))) (*.f64 x y)) < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-log1p.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} \]

      2. lower-exp.f64 97.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{x}}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(x + 1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \leq 0.1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{log1p}\left(1 + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y\\ t_1 := x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_0 \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y))) (t_1 (* x (- y))))
   (if (<= t_0 2e-6) t_1 (if (<= t_0 1.0) (log 2.0) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	double t_1 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 2e-6) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_0 <= 1.0) {
		tmp = log(2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
    t_1 = x * -y
    if (t_0 <= 2d-6) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t_0 <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = log(2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double t_0 = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
	double t_1 = x * -y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 2e-6) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t_0 <= 1.0) {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	t_0 = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)
	t_1 = x * -y
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= 2e-6:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t_0 <= 1.0:
		tmp = math.log(2.0)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	t_0 = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
	t_1 = Float64(x * Float64(-y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 2e-6)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_0 <= 1.0)
		tmp = log(2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	t_0 = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	t_1 = x * -y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= 2e-6)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t_0 <= 1.0)
		tmp = log(2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 2e-6], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 1.0], N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (log.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 x))) (*.f64 x y)) < 1.99999999999999991e-6 or 1 < (-.f64 (log.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 x))) (*.f64 x y))

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 97.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if 1.99999999999999991e-6 < (-.f64 (log.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (exp.f64 x))) (*.f64 x y)) < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-log.f64 96.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 - y, x, \log 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.4) (* x (- y)) (fma (- 0.5 y) x (log 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.4) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = fma((0.5 - y), x, log(2.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.4)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = fma(Float64(0.5 - y), x, log(2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.4], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(0.5 - y), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.3999999999999999

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 98.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.3999999999999999 < x

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} - y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2} - y\right) + \log 2} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2} - y\right) \cdot x} + \log 2 \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{2} - y, x, \log 2\right)} \]

      4. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} - y}, x, \log 2\right) \]

      5. lower-log.f64 99.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 - y, x, \color{blue}{\log 2}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 - y, x, \log 2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.4:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(0.5 - y, x, \log 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1450000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 - x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1450000.0) (* x (- y)) (- (log 2.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1450000.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) - (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1450000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) - (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1450000.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) - (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1450000.0:
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) - (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1450000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) - Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1450000.0)
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) - (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1450000.0], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.45e6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      5. lower-neg.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.45e6 < x

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{2} - x \cdot y \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

   5. Applied rewrites 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{2} - x \cdot y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1450000:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 - x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 51.7% accurate, 26.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(-y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x (- y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * -y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * Float64(-y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

   4. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

   5. lower-neg.f64 51.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot x \]

5. Applied rewrites 51.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 51.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(-y\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 3.5% accurate, 35.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* 0.5 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return 0.5 * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = 0.5d0 * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return 0.5 * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return 0.5 * x

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(0.5 * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.5 * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.6%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-log1p.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} \]

   2. lower-exp.f64 49.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{x}}\right) \]

5. Applied rewrites 49.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

   \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot x} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 48.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.5, \color{blue}{x}, \log 2\right) \]

9. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2} \cdot x \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

11. Applied rewrites 3.4%

    \[\leadsto 0.5 \cdot x \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(1 + e^{-x}\right) - \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 0.0)
   (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y))
   (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp (- x)))) (* (- x) (- 1.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 0.0) {
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
    else
        tmp = log((1.0d0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0d0 - y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 0.0) {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 0.0:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-x)))) - Float64(Float64(-x) * Float64(1.0 - y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 0.0)
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	else
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, 0.0], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[((-x) * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024273 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic regression 2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (<= x 0) (- (log (+ 1 (exp x))) (* x y)) (- (log (+ 1 (exp (- x)))) (* (- x) (- 1 y)))))

  (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))