Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 98.2% → 99.3%
Time: 6.5s
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: 1.8×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z)
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z)) + Float64(z * z))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * z)) + (z * z)) + (z * z);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y x (* (* z z) 3.0)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, x, ((z * z) * 3.0));
}
function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, x, Float64(Float64(z * z) * 3.0))
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x + N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 97.9%

    \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z} \]
    2. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
    3. lift-+.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    4. associate-+l+N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)\right)} + z \cdot z \]
    5. associate-+l+N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} \]
    6. lift-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) \]
    7. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) \]
    8. lower-fma.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} \]
    9. count-2N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z\right) \]
    10. distribute-lft1-inN/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(2 + 1\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]
    11. metadata-evalN/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{3} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right) \]
    12. lower-*.f6499.1

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right) \]
  4. Applied rewrites99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, 3 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 80.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (fma z (+ z z) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -2e+22)
     t_0
     (if (<= (* x y) 1e-29) (fma z (+ z z) (* z z)) t_0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = fma(z, (z + z), (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+22) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-29) {
		tmp = fma(z, (z + z), (z * z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = fma(z, Float64(z + z), Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2e+22)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e-29)
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(z + z), Float64(z * z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+22], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-29], N[(z * N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2e22 or 9.99999999999999943e-30 < (*.f64 x y)

    1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z} \]
      2. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      3. associate-+l+N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      5. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      6. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      7. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      8. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + z\right)} \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      9. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + z, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      10. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      11. lower-*.f6496.1

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      12. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot z}\right) \]
      13. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z + x \cdot y}\right) \]
      14. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right) \]
      15. lower-fma.f6497.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
      16. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]
      17. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]
      18. lower-*.f6497.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{{z}^{2}}\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
      2. lower-*.f6434.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
    7. Applied rewrites34.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + z \cdot z} \]
      2. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z + z \cdot z \]
      3. associate-*l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      4. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      5. distribute-lft-outN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      6. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. lower-+.f6434.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z + z}, z \cdot z\right) \]
    9. Applied rewrites34.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)} \]
    10. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right) \]
    11. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]
      2. lower-*.f6489.6

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]
    12. Applied rewrites89.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

    if -2e22 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999943e-30

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z} \]
      2. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      3. associate-+l+N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      5. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      6. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      7. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      8. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + z\right)} \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      9. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + z, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      10. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      11. lower-*.f6499.9

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      12. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot z}\right) \]
      13. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z + x \cdot y}\right) \]
      14. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right) \]
      15. lower-fma.f6499.9

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
      16. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]
      17. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]
      18. lower-*.f6499.9

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{{z}^{2}}\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
      2. lower-*.f6484.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
    7. Applied rewrites84.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + z \cdot z} \]
      2. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z + z \cdot z \]
      3. associate-*l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      4. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      5. distribute-lft-outN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      6. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. lower-+.f6484.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z + z}, z \cdot z\right) \]
    9. Applied rewrites84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification87.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 80.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (fma z (+ z z) (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -2e+22) t_0 (if (<= (* x y) 1e-29) (* (* z 3.0) z) t_0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = fma(z, (z + z), (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+22) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-29) {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = fma(z, Float64(z + z), Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2e+22)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e-29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 3.0) * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+22], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-29], N[(N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2e22 or 9.99999999999999943e-30 < (*.f64 x y)

    1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z} \]
      2. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      3. associate-+l+N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + \left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      4. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right) + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      5. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      6. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      7. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      8. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + z\right)} \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      9. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + z, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right)} \]
      10. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      11. lower-*.f6496.1

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z}, z, x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) \]
      12. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot z}\right) \]
      13. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z + x \cdot y}\right) \]
      14. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + x \cdot y\right) \]
      15. lower-fma.f6497.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
      16. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]
      17. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]
      18. lower-*.f6497.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]
    4. Applied rewrites97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{{z}^{2}}\right) \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
      2. lower-*.f6434.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
    7. Applied rewrites34.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot z, z, \color{blue}{z \cdot z}\right) \]
    8. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + z \cdot z} \]
      2. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z + z \cdot z \]
      3. associate-*l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      4. count-2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z + z \cdot z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      5. distribute-lft-outN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + z\right)} + z \cdot z \]
      6. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)} \]
      7. lower-+.f6434.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{z + z}, z \cdot z\right) \]
    9. Applied rewrites34.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, z \cdot z\right)} \]
    10. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right) \]
    11. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]
      2. lower-*.f6489.6

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]
    12. Applied rewrites89.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

    if -2e22 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999943e-30

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      2. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      3. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
      4. lower-*.f6484.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
    5. Applied rewrites84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
      2. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      3. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
      5. lower-*.f6484.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
    8. Applied rewrites84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification87.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 79.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -2e+22)
   (fma z z (* x y))
   (if (<= (* x y) 1e-29) (* (* z 3.0) z) (+ (* x y) (* z z)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+22) {
		tmp = fma(z, z, (x * y));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-29) {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2e+22)
		tmp = fma(z, z, Float64(x * y));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e-29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 3.0) * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * z));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+22], N[(z * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-29], N[(N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2e22

    1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot z \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
      2. lower-*.f6487.0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
    5. Applied rewrites87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + z \cdot z} \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z + y \cdot x} \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + y \cdot x \]
      4. lower-fma.f6490.1

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]
    7. Applied rewrites90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

    if -2e22 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999943e-30

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      2. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      3. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
      4. lower-*.f6484.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
    5. Applied rewrites84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
      2. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      3. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
      5. lower-*.f6484.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
    8. Applied rewrites84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z} \]

    if 9.99999999999999943e-30 < (*.f64 x y)

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot z \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
      2. lower-*.f6488.7

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
    5. Applied rewrites88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification87.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 79.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (fma z z (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -2e+22) t_0 (if (<= (* x y) 1e-29) (* (* z 3.0) z) t_0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = fma(z, z, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+22) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e-29) {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = fma(z, z, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2e+22)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e-29)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 3.0) * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+22], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e-29], N[(N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{-29}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2e22 or 9.99999999999999943e-30 < (*.f64 x y)

    1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \cdot z \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
      2. lower-*.f6487.9

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
    5. Applied rewrites87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z \cdot z \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-+.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + z \cdot z} \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z + y \cdot x} \]
      3. lift-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot z} + y \cdot x \]
      4. lower-fma.f6489.4

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]
    7. Applied rewrites89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

    if -2e22 < (*.f64 x y) < 9.99999999999999943e-30

    1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      2. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      3. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
      4. lower-*.f6484.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
    5. Applied rewrites84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
      2. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      3. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
      5. lower-*.f6484.6

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
    8. Applied rewrites84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 84.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* z z) 2e+23) (* x y) (* (* z 3.0) z)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+23) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z * z) <= 2d+23) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = (z * 3.0d0) * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+23) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z * z) <= 2e+23:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * z) <= 2e+23)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * 3.0) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * z) <= 2e+23)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = (z * 3.0) * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+23], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\
\;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 z z) < 1.9999999999999998e23

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
      2. lower-*.f6479.3

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
    5. Applied rewrites79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

    if 1.9999999999999998e23 < (*.f64 z z)

    1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      2. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot 3} \]
      3. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
      4. lower-*.f6487.4

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \cdot 3 \]
    5. Applied rewrites87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 3} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2}} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} \]
      2. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      3. lower-*.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} \]
      4. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
      5. lower-*.f6487.5

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right)} \cdot z \]
    8. Applied rewrites87.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification83.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot 3\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 98.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 3, z, x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (* z 3.0) z (* x y)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((z * 3.0), z, (x * y));
}
function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(z * 3.0), z, Float64(x * y))
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 3, z, x \cdot y\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 97.9%

    \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot {z}^{2} + x \cdot y} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow2N/A

      \[\leadsto 3 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)} + x \cdot y \]
    2. associate-*r*N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z} + x \cdot y \]
    3. lower-fma.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot z, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]
    4. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 3}, z, x \cdot y\right) \]
    5. lower-*.f64N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 3}, z, x \cdot y\right) \]
    6. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 3, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]
    7. lower-*.f6498.7

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 3, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]
  5. Applied rewrites98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 3, z, y \cdot x\right)} \]
  6. Final simplification98.7%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 3, z, x \cdot y\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 53.6% accurate, 5.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x \cdot y
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 97.9%

    \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z\right) + z \cdot z \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutativeN/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
    2. lower-*.f6448.2

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
  5. Applied rewrites48.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
  6. Final simplification48.2%

    \[\leadsto x \cdot y \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 98.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + y \cdot x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (* 3.0 z) z) (* y x)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((3.0d0 * z) * z) + (y * x)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x)
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(3.0 * z) * z) + Float64(y * x))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((3.0 * z) * z) + (y * x);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(3.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(3 \cdot z\right) \cdot z + y \cdot x
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024273 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* (* 3 z) z) (* y x)))

  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z z)) (* z z)) (* z z)))