expq3 (problem 3.4.2)

Percentage Accurate: 0.0% → 99.9%

Time: 25.4s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 29.1×

Specification

\[\left(\left|a\right| \leq 710 \land \left|b\right| \leq 710\right) \land \left(10^{-27} \cdot \mathsf{min}\left(\left|a\right|, \left|b\right|\right) \leq \varepsilon \land \varepsilon \leq \mathsf{min}\left(\left|a\right|, \left|b\right|\right)\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 0.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 13.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / b) + (1.0d0 / a)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 0.0%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in eps around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{a + b}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]

   2. associate-/r* N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]

   3. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]

   4. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{b}}}{a} \]

   5. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]

   6. lower-+.f64 99.8

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]

5. Applied rewrites 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{b + a}{b}}{a}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around inf

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{a} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{a} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

9. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 62.9% accurate, 10.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-191}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-125}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b + a}{b \cdot a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 2.8e-191)
   (/ 1.0 b)
   (if (<= b 1.12e-125) (/ 1.0 a) (/ (+ b a) (* b a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.8e-191) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else if (b <= 1.12e-125) {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	} else {
		tmp = (b + a) / (b * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= 2.8d-191) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else if (b <= 1.12d-125) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    else
        tmp = (b + a) / (b * a)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.8e-191) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else if (b <= 1.12e-125) {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	} else {
		tmp = (b + a) / (b * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= 2.8e-191:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	elif b <= 1.12e-125:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	else:
		tmp = (b + a) / (b * a)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 2.8e-191)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	elseif (b <= 1.12e-125)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b + a) / Float64(b * a));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= 2.8e-191)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	elseif (b <= 1.12e-125)
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	else
		tmp = (b + a) / (b * a);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.8e-191], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 1.12e-125], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b + a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < 2.80000000000000012e-191

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 58.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if 2.80000000000000012e-191 < b < 1.11999999999999997e-125

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 51.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

   if 1.11999999999999997e-125 < b

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in eps around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{a + b}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]

      2. associate-/r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]

      3. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a + b}{b}}{a}} \]

      4. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{b}}}{a} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]

      6. lower-+.f64 99.8

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{b}}{a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{b + a}{b}}{a}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a + b}{\color{blue}{a \cdot b}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-191}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-125}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b + a}{b \cdot a}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 61.1% accurate, 19.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-191}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (if (<= b 2.8e-191) (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.8e-191) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= 2.8d-191) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.8e-191) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= 2.8e-191:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 2.8e-191)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= 2.8e-191)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.8e-191], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < 2.80000000000000012e-191

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 58.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if 2.80000000000000012e-191 < b

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 62.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 62.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 49.9% accurate, 29.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 a))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = 1.0d0 / a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return 1.0 / a

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(1.0 / a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 1.0 / a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 0.0%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 48.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 48.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.9% accurate, 13.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 a) (/ 1.0 b)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / a) + (1.0d0 / b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(1.0 / b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024273 
(FPCore (a b eps)
  :name "expq3 (problem 3.4.2)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (<= (fabs a) 710.0) (<= (fabs b) 710.0)) (and (<= (* 1e-27 (fmin (fabs a) (fabs b))) eps) (<= eps (fmin (fabs a) (fabs b)))))

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (/ 1 a) (/ 1 b)))

  (/ (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0)) (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))