Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 99.0%
Time: 16.7s
Alternatives: 12
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 12 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\\ \log \left(-1 - \frac{-1}{\left(t\_0 - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u - t\_0}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (PI) s)) 1.0))))
   (*
    (log
     (-
      -1.0
      (/ -1.0 (- (* (- t_0 (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0))) u) t_0))))
    (- s))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\\
\log \left(-1 - \frac{-1}{\left(t\_0 - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u - t\_0}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \log \left(-1 - \frac{-1}{\left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 28.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\\ t_1 := \frac{-1}{e^{t\_0} + 1}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\log \left(-1 - \frac{-1}{\left(t\_1 - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u - t\_1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \leq -2.9999998795923744 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\left(\frac{t\_0 + 1}{u} - 2 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u, -0.5, {\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{0.5} \cdot 0.25\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (PI) s)) (t_1 (/ -1.0 (+ (exp t_0) 1.0))))
   (if (<=
        (*
         (log
          (-
           -1.0
           (/
            -1.0
            (- (* (- t_1 (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0))) u) t_1))))
         (- s))
        -2.9999998795923744e-13)
     (* (log (* (- (/ (+ t_0 1.0) u) (* 2.0 t_0)) u)) (- s))
     (*
      (log
       (fma
        (fma (* (PI) u) -0.5 (* (pow (* (PI) (PI)) 0.5) 0.25))
        (/ 4.0 s)
        1.0))
      (- s)))))
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\\
t_1 := \frac{-1}{e^{t\_0} + 1}\\
\mathbf{if}\;\log \left(-1 - \frac{-1}{\left(t\_1 - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u - t\_1}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \leq -2.9999998795923744 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\
\;\;\;\;\log \left(\left(\frac{t\_0 + 1}{u} - 2 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u, -0.5, {\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{0.5} \cdot 0.25\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f32 (neg.f32 s) (log.f32 (-.f32 (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 (*.f32 u (-.f32 (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (exp.f32 (/.f32 (neg.f32 (PI.f32)) s)))) (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (exp.f32 (/.f32 (PI.f32) s)))))) (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (exp.f32 (/.f32 (PI.f32) s)))))) #s(literal 1 binary32)))) < -2.99999988e-13

    1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
      3. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 4}}{s} + 1\right) \]
      4. associate-/l*N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \frac{4}{s}} + 1\right) \]
      5. lower-fma.f32N/A

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites7.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in u around -inf

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}{u} + 2 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites29.2%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(-u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} - \frac{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1}{u}\right)}\right) \]

      if -2.99999988e-13 < (*.f32 (neg.f32 s) (log.f32 (-.f32 (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 (*.f32 u (-.f32 (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (exp.f32 (/.f32 (neg.f32 (PI.f32)) s)))) (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (exp.f32 (/.f32 (PI.f32) s)))))) (/.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (+.f32 #s(literal 1 binary32) (exp.f32 (/.f32 (PI.f32) s)))))) #s(literal 1 binary32))))

      1. Initial program 98.8%

        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. associate-*r/N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
        2. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
        3. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 4}}{s} + 1\right) \]
        4. associate-/l*N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \frac{4}{s}} + 1\right) \]
        5. lower-fma.f32N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
      5. Applied rewrites12.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites29.1%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot {\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{0.5}\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right) \]
      7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      8. Final simplification29.0%

        \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\log \left(-1 - \frac{-1}{\left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \leq -2.9999998795923744 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\left(\frac{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1}{u} - 2 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u, -0.5, {\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{0.5} \cdot 0.25\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)\\ \end{array} \]
      9. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 3: 97.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (u s)
       :precision binary32
       (*
        (log
         (-
          (/
           1.0
           (*
            (-
             (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (PI) s)) 1.0))
             (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0)))
            u))
          1.0))
        (- s)))
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 99.0%

        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
        2. lower-*.f32N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
      5. Applied rewrites98.4%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
      6. Final simplification98.4%

        \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
      7. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 4: 96.4% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{\left(1 - \frac{-0.5 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (u s)
       :precision binary32
       (*
        (log
         (-
          (/
           1.0
           (*
            (-
             (/ -1.0 (+ (- 1.0 (/ (- (* -0.5 (/ (* (PI) (PI)) s)) (PI)) s)) 1.0))
             (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0)))
            u))
          1.0))
        (- s)))
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{\left(1 - \frac{-0.5 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 99.0%

        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
      4. Step-by-step derivation
        1. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
        2. lower-*.f32N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
      5. Applied rewrites98.4%

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
      6. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

        \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \frac{-1}{2} \cdot \frac{{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}}{s}}{s}\right) + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
      7. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites97.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{\left(1 - \frac{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} \cdot -0.5 - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
        2. Final simplification97.4%

          \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{\left(1 - \frac{-0.5 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
        3. Add Preprocessing

        Alternative 5: 94.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (u s)
         :precision binary32
         (*
          (log
           (-
            (/
             1.0
             (*
              (-
               (/ -1.0 (+ (+ (/ (PI) s) 1.0) 1.0))
               (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0)))
              u))
            1.0))
          (- s)))
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Initial program 99.0%

          \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutativeN/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
          2. lower-*.f32N/A

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
        5. Applied rewrites98.4%

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
        6. Taylor expanded in s around inf

          \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{\left(1 + \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right) + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
        7. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites95.0%

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          2. Final simplification95.0%

            \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{\left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
          3. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 6: 37.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (u s)
           :precision binary32
           (*
            (log
             (-
              (/
               1.0
               (* (- (/ -1.0 (+ 1.0 1.0)) (/ -1.0 (+ (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)) 1.0))) u))
              1.0))
            (- s)))
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 99.0%

            \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in u around inf

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right)}} - 1\right) \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. *-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
            2. lower-*.f32N/A

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
          5. Applied rewrites98.4%

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u}} - 1\right) \]
          6. Taylor expanded in s around inf

            \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
          7. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites37.6%

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1} - \frac{1}{1 + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \]
            2. Final simplification37.6%

              \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{-1}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}} + 1}\right) \cdot u} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
            3. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 7: 25.2% accurate, 4.2× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (log (+ (/ (PI) s) 1.0)) (- s)))
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 99.0%

              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
            2. Add Preprocessing
            3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}\right)} \]
            4. Step-by-step derivation
              1. associate-*r/N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
              2. +-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
              3. *-commutativeN/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 4}}{s} + 1\right) \]
              4. associate-/l*N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot \frac{4}{s}} + 1\right) \]
              5. lower-fma.f32N/A

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
            5. Applied rewrites10.2%

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right), \frac{4}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
            6. Taylor expanded in u around 0

              \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}\right) \]
            7. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites25.5%

                \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + \color{blue}{1}\right) \]
              2. Final simplification25.5%

                \[\leadsto \log \left(\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s} + 1\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
              3. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 8: 7.5% accurate, 18.9× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(4, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \left(\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (u s)
               :precision binary32
               (fma 4.0 (* 0.25 (PI)) (* (* (* -0.5 u) (PI)) 4.0)))
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              \mathsf{fma}\left(4, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \left(\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 4\right)
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 99.0%

                \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \frac{-1}{2} \cdot \frac{-16 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -2 \cdot \left(-8 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}{s}} \]
              4. Applied rewrites8.1%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, -16, \mathsf{fma}\left(16, {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, 0\right)\right)}{s}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)} \]
              5. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites11.1%

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0}{-\left(-\left(-s\right)\right)}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) \]
                2. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. Applied rewrites11.1%

                    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0}{-\left(-\left(-s\right)\right)}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.5 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) \]
                  2. Applied rewrites12.6%

                    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(4, \color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}, 4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right) \]
                  3. Final simplification12.6%

                    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(4, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), \left(\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot 4\right) \]
                  4. Add Preprocessing

                  Alternative 9: 11.7% accurate, 20.4× speedup?

                  \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u \end{array} \]
                  (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- (* 2.0 (PI)) (/ (PI) u)) u))
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  
                  \\
                  \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot u
                  \end{array}
                  
                  Derivation
                  1. Initial program 99.0%

                    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing
                  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \frac{-1}{2} \cdot \frac{-16 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -2 \cdot \left(-8 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}{s}} \]
                  4. Applied rewrites8.3%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, -16, \mathsf{fma}\left(16, {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, 0\right)\right)}{s}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)} \]
                  5. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. Applied rewrites11.1%

                      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0}{-\left(-\left(-s\right)\right)}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) \]
                    2. Taylor expanded in u around inf

                      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u} + 2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
                    3. Step-by-step derivation
                      1. Applied rewrites11.3%

                        \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{u}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{u} \]
                      2. Add Preprocessing

                      Alternative 10: 11.7% accurate, 36.4× speedup?

                      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2 - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \end{array} \]
                      (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (* (* (PI) u) 2.0) (PI)))
                      \begin{array}{l}
                      
                      \\
                      \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2 - \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)
                      \end{array}
                      
                      Derivation
                      1. Initial program 99.0%

                        \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                      2. Add Preprocessing
                      3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

                        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \frac{-1}{2} \cdot \frac{-16 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -2 \cdot \left(-8 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}{s}} \]
                      4. Applied rewrites7.4%

                        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, -16, \mathsf{fma}\left(16, {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, 0\right)\right)}{s}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)} \]
                      5. Step-by-step derivation
                        1. Applied rewrites11.1%

                          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0}{-\left(-\left(-s\right)\right)}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) \]
                        2. Step-by-step derivation
                          1. Applied rewrites11.1%

                            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{0}{-\left(-\left(-s\right)\right)}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.5 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right) \]
                          2. Taylor expanded in u around 0

                            \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
                          3. Step-by-step derivation
                            1. Applied rewrites11.3%

                              \[\leadsto \left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \cdot u\right) \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
                            2. Add Preprocessing

                            Alternative 11: 11.5% accurate, 170.0× speedup?

                            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\mathsf{PI}\left(\right) \end{array} \]
                            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (PI)))
                            \begin{array}{l}
                            
                            \\
                            -\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)
                            \end{array}
                            
                            Derivation
                            1. Initial program 99.0%

                              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                            2. Add Preprocessing
                            3. Taylor expanded in u around 0

                              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
                            4. Step-by-step derivation
                              1. mul-1-negN/A

                                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)} \]
                              2. lower-neg.f32N/A

                                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
                              3. lower-PI.f3211.1

                                \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
                            5. Applied rewrites11.1%

                              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)} \]
                            6. Add Preprocessing

                            Alternative 12: 10.3% accurate, 510.0× speedup?

                            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]
                            (FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 0.0)
                            float code(float u, float s) {
                            	return 0.0f;
                            }
                            
                            real(4) function code(u, s)
                                real(4), intent (in) :: u
                                real(4), intent (in) :: s
                                code = 0.0e0
                            end function
                            
                            function code(u, s)
                            	return Float32(0.0)
                            end
                            
                            function tmp = code(u, s)
                            	tmp = single(0.0);
                            end
                            
                            \begin{array}{l}
                            
                            \\
                            0
                            \end{array}
                            
                            Derivation
                            1. Initial program 99.0%

                              \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
                            2. Add Preprocessing
                            3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf

                              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \frac{-1}{2} \cdot \frac{-16 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -2 \cdot \left(-8 \cdot {\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right) - \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) - \frac{-1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2} + \frac{1}{8} \cdot {\mathsf{PI}\left(\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}{s}} \]
                            4. Applied rewrites7.7%

                              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, -16, \mathsf{fma}\left(16, {\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)\right)}^{2}, 0\right)\right)}{s}, -0.5, \mathsf{fma}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right), -0.5, 0.25 \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) \cdot -4\right)} \]
                            5. Taylor expanded in s around 0

                              \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-16 \cdot {\left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2} + 16 \cdot {\left(\frac{-1}{2} \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right) + \frac{1}{4} \cdot \mathsf{PI}\left(\right)\right)}^{2}}{s}} \]
                            6. Step-by-step derivation
                              1. Applied rewrites10.2%

                                \[\leadsto \frac{0}{\color{blue}{s}} \]
                              2. Taylor expanded in s around 0

                                \[\leadsto 0 \]
                              3. Step-by-step derivation
                                1. Applied rewrites10.2%

                                  \[\leadsto 0 \]
                                2. Add Preprocessing

                                Reproduce

                                ?
                                herbie shell --seed 2024272 
                                (FPCore (u s)
                                  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
                                  :precision binary32
                                  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
                                  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- (PI)) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (PI) s)))))) 1.0))))