Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 77.4% → 96.8%
Time: 9.2s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 27.6×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 77.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.8% accurate, 5.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right)\\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot wj, t\_0, 1\right) - t\_0 \cdot wj, x, \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (fma (fma -2.6666666666666665 wj 2.5) wj -2.0)))
   (fma (- (fma (* 2.0 wj) t_0 1.0) (* t_0 wj)) x (* (* wj wj) (- 1.0 wj)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), wj, -2.0);
	return fma((fma((2.0 * wj), t_0, 1.0) - (t_0 * wj)), x, ((wj * wj) * (1.0 - wj)));
}
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), wj, -2.0)
	return fma(Float64(fma(Float64(2.0 * wj), t_0, 1.0) - Float64(t_0 * wj)), x, Float64(Float64(wj * wj) * Float64(1.0 - wj)))
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(-2.6666666666666665 * wj + 2.5), $MachinePrecision] * wj + -2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(N[(2.0 * wj), $MachinePrecision] * t$95$0 + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$0 * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right)\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot wj, t\_0, 1\right) - t\_0 \cdot wj, x, \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 78.2%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrites96.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Applied rewrites58.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - wj \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.6666666666666665, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, -x\right)}{{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - wj \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.6666666666666665, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj\right)}^{2} - x \cdot x}}} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\left(1 + 2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right)\right)\right) - wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right)\right) + \color{blue}{{wj}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites96.7%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right) \cdot wj, \color{blue}{x}, \left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\right) \]
      2. Final simplification96.7%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2 \cdot wj, \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), 1\right) - \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right) \cdot wj, x, \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)\right) \]
      3. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 2: 96.8% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, \frac{1 - wj}{x} \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\right), x, x\right) \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x)
       :precision binary64
       (fma
        (fma
         (fma (fma -2.6666666666666665 wj 2.5) wj -2.0)
         wj
         (* (/ (- 1.0 wj) x) (* wj wj)))
        x
        x))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	return fma(fma(fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), wj, -2.0), wj, (((1.0 - wj) / x) * (wj * wj))), x, x);
      }
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	return fma(fma(fma(fma(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5), wj, -2.0), wj, Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) / x) * Float64(wj * wj))), x, x)
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-2.6666666666666665 * wj + 2.5), $MachinePrecision] * wj + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x + x), $MachinePrecision]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, \frac{1 - wj}{x} \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\right), x, x\right)
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Initial program 78.2%

        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing
      3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
      4. Applied rewrites96.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
      5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{5}{2}, x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
      6. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites96.4%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
        2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{8}{3} \cdot wj\right) - 2\right) + \frac{{wj}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]
        3. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites96.6%

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \frac{1 - wj}{x}\right), \color{blue}{x}, x\right) \]
          2. Final simplification96.6%

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(-2.6666666666666665, wj, 2.5\right), wj, -2\right), wj, \frac{1 - wj}{x} \cdot \left(wj \cdot wj\right)\right), x, x\right) \]
          3. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 3: 96.5% accurate, 14.4× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ (* (fma (- 1.0 wj) wj (* -2.0 x)) wj) x))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return (fma((1.0 - wj), wj, (-2.0 * x)) * wj) + x;
          }
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return Float64(Float64(fma(Float64(1.0 - wj), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)) * wj) + x)
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 78.2%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
          4. Applied rewrites96.3%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
          5. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites96.3%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - wj \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2.6666666666666665, 1\right)\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + \color{blue}{x} \]
            2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
            3. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites96.6%

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj + x \]
              2. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 4: 96.5% accurate, 15.8× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (fma (- 1.0 wj) wj (* -2.0 x)) wj x))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return fma(fma((1.0 - wj), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
              }
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return fma(fma(Float64(1.0 - wj), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 78.2%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
              4. Applied rewrites96.3%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
              5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{5}{2}, x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
              6. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites96.4%

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                3. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. Applied rewrites96.6%

                    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing

                  Alternative 5: 81.8% accurate, 16.5× speedup?

                  \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
                  (FPCore (wj x)
                   :precision binary64
                   (if (<= wj 2.5e-68) (fma (* x wj) -2.0 x) (* (* (- 1.0 wj) wj) wj)))
                  double code(double wj, double x) {
                  	double tmp;
                  	if (wj <= 2.5e-68) {
                  		tmp = fma((x * wj), -2.0, x);
                  	} else {
                  		tmp = ((1.0 - wj) * wj) * wj;
                  	}
                  	return tmp;
                  }
                  
                  function code(wj, x)
                  	tmp = 0.0
                  	if (wj <= 2.5e-68)
                  		tmp = fma(Float64(x * wj), -2.0, x);
                  	else
                  		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * wj) * wj);
                  	end
                  	return tmp
                  end
                  
                  code[wj_, x_] := If[LessEqual[wj, 2.5e-68], N[(N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]]
                  
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  
                  \\
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\
                  \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)\\
                  
                  \mathbf{else}:\\
                  \;\;\;\;\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj\\
                  
                  
                  \end{array}
                  \end{array}
                  
                  Derivation
                  1. Split input into 2 regimes
                  2. if wj < 2.49999999999999986e-68

                    1. Initial program 82.4%

                      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                    2. Add Preprocessing
                    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
                    4. Step-by-step derivation
                      1. +-commutativeN/A

                        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
                      2. *-commutativeN/A

                        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right) \cdot -2} + x \]
                      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

                        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
                      4. lower-*.f6491.6

                        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot x}, -2, x\right) \]
                    5. Applied rewrites91.6%

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]

                    if 2.49999999999999986e-68 < wj

                    1. Initial program 40.9%

                      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                    2. Add Preprocessing
                    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                    4. Applied rewrites80.7%

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                      \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} \]
                    6. Step-by-step derivation
                      1. Applied rewrites52.6%

                        \[\leadsto \left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
                    7. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
                    8. Final simplification87.6%

                      \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj\\ \end{array} \]
                    9. Add Preprocessing

                    Alternative 6: 96.1% accurate, 19.5× speedup?

                    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj + x \end{array} \]
                    (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ (* (* (- 1.0 wj) wj) wj) x))
                    double code(double wj, double x) {
                    	return (((1.0 - wj) * wj) * wj) + x;
                    }
                    
                    real(8) function code(wj, x)
                        real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                        real(8), intent (in) :: x
                        code = (((1.0d0 - wj) * wj) * wj) + x
                    end function
                    
                    public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                    	return (((1.0 - wj) * wj) * wj) + x;
                    }
                    
                    def code(wj, x):
                    	return (((1.0 - wj) * wj) * wj) + x
                    
                    function code(wj, x)
                    	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * wj) * wj) + x)
                    end
                    
                    function tmp = code(wj, x)
                    	tmp = (((1.0 - wj) * wj) * wj) + x;
                    end
                    
                    code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]
                    
                    \begin{array}{l}
                    
                    \\
                    \left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj + x
                    \end{array}
                    
                    Derivation
                    1. Initial program 78.2%

                      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                    2. Add Preprocessing
                    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                    4. Applied rewrites96.3%

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
                    6. Step-by-step derivation
                      1. Applied rewrites96.2%

                        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
                      2. Step-by-step derivation
                        1. Applied rewrites96.2%

                          \[\leadsto \left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot wj + \color{blue}{x} \]
                        2. Add Preprocessing

                        Alternative 7: 96.1% accurate, 22.1× speedup?

                        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
                        (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* (- 1.0 wj) wj) wj x))
                        double code(double wj, double x) {
                        	return fma(((1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x);
                        }
                        
                        function code(wj, x)
                        	return fma(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x)
                        end
                        
                        code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
                        
                        \begin{array}{l}
                        
                        \\
                        \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right)
                        \end{array}
                        
                        Derivation
                        1. Initial program 78.2%

                          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                        2. Add Preprocessing
                        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                        4. Applied rewrites96.3%

                          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                        5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
                        6. Step-by-step derivation
                          1. Applied rewrites96.2%

                            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
                          2. Add Preprocessing

                          Alternative 8: 84.6% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

                          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \end{array} \]
                          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* x wj) -2.0 x))
                          double code(double wj, double x) {
                          	return fma((x * wj), -2.0, x);
                          }
                          
                          function code(wj, x)
                          	return fma(Float64(x * wj), -2.0, x)
                          end
                          
                          code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]
                          
                          \begin{array}{l}
                          
                          \\
                          \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)
                          \end{array}
                          
                          Derivation
                          1. Initial program 78.2%

                            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                          2. Add Preprocessing
                          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
                          4. Step-by-step derivation
                            1. +-commutativeN/A

                              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
                            2. *-commutativeN/A

                              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right) \cdot -2} + x \]
                            3. lower-fma.f64N/A

                              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
                            4. lower-*.f6485.3

                              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot x}, -2, x\right) \]
                          5. Applied rewrites85.3%

                            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
                          6. Final simplification85.3%

                            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \]
                          7. Add Preprocessing

                          Alternative 9: 72.7% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

                          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(-x\right) \end{array} \]
                          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (- wj (- x)))
                          double code(double wj, double x) {
                          	return wj - -x;
                          }
                          
                          real(8) function code(wj, x)
                              real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                              real(8), intent (in) :: x
                              code = wj - -x
                          end function
                          
                          public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                          	return wj - -x;
                          }
                          
                          def code(wj, x):
                          	return wj - -x
                          
                          function code(wj, x)
                          	return Float64(wj - Float64(-x))
                          end
                          
                          function tmp = code(wj, x)
                          	tmp = wj - -x;
                          end
                          
                          code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - (-x)), $MachinePrecision]
                          
                          \begin{array}{l}
                          
                          \\
                          wj - \left(-x\right)
                          \end{array}
                          
                          Derivation
                          1. Initial program 78.2%

                            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                          2. Add Preprocessing
                          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
                          4. Step-by-step derivation
                            1. mul-1-negN/A

                              \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)} \]
                            2. lower-neg.f6473.1

                              \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
                          5. Applied rewrites73.1%

                            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
                          6. Add Preprocessing

                          Alternative 10: 4.2% accurate, 82.8× speedup?

                          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - 1 \end{array} \]
                          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (- wj 1.0))
                          double code(double wj, double x) {
                          	return wj - 1.0;
                          }
                          
                          real(8) function code(wj, x)
                              real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                              real(8), intent (in) :: x
                              code = wj - 1.0d0
                          end function
                          
                          public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                          	return wj - 1.0;
                          }
                          
                          def code(wj, x):
                          	return wj - 1.0
                          
                          function code(wj, x)
                          	return Float64(wj - 1.0)
                          end
                          
                          function tmp = code(wj, x)
                          	tmp = wj - 1.0;
                          end
                          
                          code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]
                          
                          \begin{array}{l}
                          
                          \\
                          wj - 1
                          \end{array}
                          
                          Derivation
                          1. Initial program 78.2%

                            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                          2. Add Preprocessing
                          3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
                          4. Step-by-step derivation
                            1. Applied rewrites4.2%

                              \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
                            2. Add Preprocessing

                            Developer Target 1: 78.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

                            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
                            (FPCore (wj x)
                             :precision binary64
                             (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
                            double code(double wj, double x) {
                            	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                            }
                            
                            real(8) function code(wj, x)
                                real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                                real(8), intent (in) :: x
                                code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
                            end function
                            
                            public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                            	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
                            }
                            
                            def code(wj, x):
                            	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
                            
                            function code(wj, x)
                            	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
                            end
                            
                            function tmp = code(wj, x)
                            	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                            end
                            
                            code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
                            
                            \begin{array}{l}
                            
                            \\
                            wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
                            \end{array}
                            

                            Reproduce

                            ?
                            herbie shell --seed 2024268 
                            (FPCore (wj x)
                              :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
                              :precision binary64
                            
                              :alt
                              (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
                            
                              (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))