Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.6s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.2×

• 20.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- y x) z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((y - x), z, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(y - x), z, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y - x, z, x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.1e-54)
   (* z y)
   (if (<= z 3.2e-102) (* 1.0 x) (if (<= z 2.05e+210) (* z y) (* (- x) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-102) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else if (z <= 2.05e+210) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.1d-54)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (z <= 3.2d-102) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else if (z <= 2.05d+210) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = -x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-102) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else if (z <= 2.05e+210) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.1e-54:
		tmp = z * y
	elif z <= 3.2e-102:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	elif z <= 2.05e+210:
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = -x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.1e-54)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-102)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	elseif (z <= 2.05e+210)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-x) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-102)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	elseif (z <= 2.05e+210)
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = -x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.1e-54], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.2e-102], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.05e+210], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[((-x) * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.1e-54 or 3.19999999999999986e-102 < z < 2.05e210

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 60.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.1e-54 < z < 3.19999999999999986e-102

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 76.2

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]

   if 2.05e210 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. lower--.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot z \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-x\right) \cdot z \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+210}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -52000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* z (- y x))))
   (if (<= z -52000000.0) t_0 (if (<= z 7.5e-7) (+ (* z y) x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -52000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 7.5e-7) {
		tmp = (z * y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z * (y - x)
    if (z <= (-52000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 7.5d-7) then
        tmp = (z * y) + x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -52000000.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 7.5e-7) {
		tmp = (z * y) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z * (y - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -52000000.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 7.5e-7:
		tmp = (z * y) + x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z * Float64(y - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -52000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 7.5e-7)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z * (y - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -52000000.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 7.5e-7)
		tmp = (z * y) + x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -52000000.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 7.5e-7], N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.2e7 or 7.5000000000000002e-7 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. lower--.f64 99.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -5.2e7 < z < 7.5000000000000002e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 98.8

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -52000000:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* z (- y x))))
   (if (<= z -2.1e-54) t_0 (if (<= z 3.2e-102) (* (- 1.0 z) x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-102) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = z * (y - x)
    if (z <= (-2.1d-54)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z <= 3.2d-102) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = z * (y - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-102) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = z * (y - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.1e-54:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z <= 3.2e-102:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(z * Float64(y - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.1e-54)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-102)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = z * (y - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-102)
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(z * N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2.1e-54], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[z, 3.2e-102], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.1e-54 or 3.19999999999999986e-102 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. lower--.f64 92.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -2.1e-54 < z < 3.19999999999999986e-102

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 76.2

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.4e+74) (* z y) (if (<= y 1e+48) (* (- 1.0 z) x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.4e+74) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= 1e+48) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.4d+74)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (y <= 1d+48) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - z) * x
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.4e+74) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (y <= 1e+48) {
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.4e+74:
		tmp = z * y
	elif y <= 1e+48:
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.4e+74)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (y <= 1e+48)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.4e+74)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (y <= 1e+48)
		tmp = (1.0 - z) * x;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.4e+74], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1e+48], N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.40000000000000001e74 or 1.00000000000000004e48 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 76.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.40000000000000001e74 < y < 1.00000000000000004e48

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 82.4

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+74}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 60.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.1e-54) (* z y) (if (<= z 3.2e-102) (* 1.0 x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-102) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.1d-54)) then
        tmp = z * y
    else if (z <= 3.2d-102) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = z * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 3.2e-102) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.1e-54:
		tmp = z * y
	elif z <= 3.2e-102:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = z * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.1e-54)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-102)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.1e-54)
		tmp = z * y;
	elseif (z <= 3.2e-102)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = z * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.1e-54], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.2e-102], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.1e-54 or 3.19999999999999986e-102 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 57.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 57.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.1e-54 < z < 3.19999999999999986e-102

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 76.2

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 76.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-102}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 41.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 46.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

5. Applied rewrites 46.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

6. Final simplification 46.6%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024268 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* (- y x) z)))