Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.3% → 96.8%

Time: 7.4s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 0.5×

• 32.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right) + \left(a \cdot t + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* b (* a z)) (+ (* a t) (+ (* z y) x)))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (fma (fma b z t) a x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (b * (a * z)) + ((a * t) + ((z * y) + x));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(b * Float64(a * z)) + Float64(Float64(a * t) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 77.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right) + \left(a \cdot t + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right) + \left(a \cdot t + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+98}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma z y (fma t a x))))
   (if (<= y -1.95e+84) t_1 (if (<= y 5.8e+98) (fma (fma b z t) a x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+84) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 5.8e+98) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.95e+84)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 5.8e+98)
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * y + N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.95e+84], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 5.8e+98], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.95000000000000008e84 or 5.8000000000000002e98 < y

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + a \cdot t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 92.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.95000000000000008e84 < y < 5.8000000000000002e98

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 89.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.7% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (fma b a y) z x)))
   (if (<= z -2.8e+159) t_1 (if (<= z 7.5e+82) (fma z y (fma t a x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.8e+159) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 7.5e+82) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.8e+159)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 7.5e+82)
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2.8e+159], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 7.5e+82], N[(z * y + N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.8000000000000001e159 or 7.4999999999999999e82 < z

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 93.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -2.8000000000000001e159 < z < 7.4999999999999999e82

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + a \cdot t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 85.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+84}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b a y) z)))
   (if (<= z -2.9e+159) t_1 (if (<= z 5.8e+84) (fma z y (fma t a x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.9e+159) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 5.8e+84) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.9e+159)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 5.8e+84)
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2.9e+159], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 5.8e+84], N[(z * y + N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.90000000000000014e159 or 5.79999999999999977e84 < z

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 86.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -2.90000000000000014e159 < z < 5.79999999999999977e84

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + a \cdot t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 85.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b a y) z)))
   (if (<= z -7.5e+58) t_1 (if (<= z 9e-44) (fma t a x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.5e+58) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 9e-44) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7.5e+58)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 9e-44)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -7.5e+58], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 9e-44], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.5000000000000001e58 or 8.9999999999999997e-44 < z

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 75.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -7.5000000000000001e58 < z < 8.9999999999999997e-44

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 76.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+140}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -4.8e+140)
   (fma t a x)
   (if (<= t 7.5e-46) (fma (* a z) b x) (fma t a x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -4.8e+140) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else if (t <= 7.5e-46) {
		tmp = fma((a * z), b, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -4.8e+140)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	elseif (t <= 7.5e-46)
		tmp = fma(Float64(a * z), b, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, -4.8e+140], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 7.5e-46], N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -4.7999999999999999e140 or 7.50000000000000027e-46 < t

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 71.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   if -4.7999999999999999e140 < t < 7.50000000000000027e-46

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 77.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot a, \color{blue}{b}, x\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+140}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a \cdot z, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 59.3% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+150}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.3e+150)
   (fma z y x)
   (if (<= z 1.35e+91) (fma t a x) (* (* b a) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.3e+150) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (z <= 1.35e+91) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = (b * a) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.3e+150)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (z <= 1.35e+91)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b * a) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.3e+150], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.35e+91], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.30000000000000003e150

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 58.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -1.30000000000000003e150 < z < 1.35e91

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 69.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   if 1.35e91 < z

   1. Initial program 89.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. lower-*.f64 54.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 54.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 62.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-63}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -1.4e-63) (fma t a x) (if (<= t 1.15e-33) (fma z y x) (fma t a x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.4e-63) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else if (t <= 1.15e-33) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -1.4e-63)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	elseif (t <= 1.15e-33)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, -1.4e-63], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.15e-33], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.4000000000000001e-63 or 1.14999999999999993e-33 < t

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 66.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   if -1.4000000000000001e-63 < t < 1.14999999999999993e-33

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 64.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 64.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 58.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+152}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -6.2e+152) (* z y) (if (<= z 5.5e+89) (fma t a x) (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.2e+152) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else if (z <= 5.5e+89) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = z * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -6.2e+152)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	elseif (z <= 5.5e+89)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -6.2e+152], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 5.5e+89], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.2e152 or 5.49999999999999976e89 < z

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 45.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -6.2e152 < z < 5.49999999999999976e89

   1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 70.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 38.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -5.2e-69) (* a t) (if (<= t 1.15e-33) (* z y) (* a t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.2e-69) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (t <= 1.15e-33) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-5.2d-69)) then
        tmp = a * t
    else if (t <= 1.15d-33) then
        tmp = z * y
    else
        tmp = a * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.2e-69) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (t <= 1.15e-33) {
		tmp = z * y;
	} else {
		tmp = a * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -5.2e-69:
		tmp = a * t
	elif t <= 1.15e-33:
		tmp = z * y
	else:
		tmp = a * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -5.2e-69)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	elseif (t <= 1.15e-33)
		tmp = Float64(z * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -5.2e-69)
		tmp = a * t;
	elseif (t <= 1.15e-33)
		tmp = z * y;
	else
		tmp = a * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, -5.2e-69], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.15e-33], N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -5.2000000000000004e-69 or 1.14999999999999993e-33 < t

   1. Initial program 93.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

   if -5.2000000000000004e-69 < t < 1.14999999999999993e-33

   1. Initial program 97.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 32.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 32.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-69}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 28.1% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.9%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 32.2

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

5. Applied rewrites 32.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

6. Final simplification 32.2%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024268 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))