Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 77.8% → 98.8%
Time: 8.4s
Alternatives: 8
Speedup: 27.6×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 77.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{-1 - wj}, e^{-wj}, \frac{wj}{wj - -1}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp wj) wj)))
   (if (<= (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ t_0 (exp wj)))) 4e-15)
     (fma
      (fma
       (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
       wj
       (* -2.0 x))
      wj
      x)
     (- wj (fma (/ x (- -1.0 wj)) (exp (- wj)) (/ wj (- wj -1.0)))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = exp(wj) * wj;
	double tmp;
	if ((wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)))) <= 4e-15) {
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	} else {
		tmp = wj - fma((x / (-1.0 - wj)), exp(-wj), (wj / (wj - -1.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(exp(wj) * wj)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(t_0 + exp(wj)))) <= 4e-15)
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj - fma(Float64(x / Float64(-1.0 - wj)), exp(Float64(-wj)), Float64(wj / Float64(wj - -1.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 4e-15], N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj - N[(N[(x / N[(-1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[(-wj)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj / N[(wj - -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\
\mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{-1 - wj}, e^{-wj}, \frac{wj}{wj - -1}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 4.0000000000000003e-15

    1. Initial program 72.5%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]

    if 4.0000000000000003e-15 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

    1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites3.7%

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
      2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
        2. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        3. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + wj\right)} \cdot e^{wj}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        4. times-fracN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(\color{blue}{\frac{wj}{1 + wj} \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} + -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        5. *-inversesN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \left(\frac{wj}{1 + wj} \cdot \color{blue}{1} + -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        6. lower-fma.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{1 + wj}, 1, -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
        7. lower-/.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{wj}{1 + wj}}, 1, -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        8. +-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}}, 1, -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        9. lower-+.f64N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}}, 1, -1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]
        10. mul-1-negN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1}, 1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]
        11. *-lft-identityN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1}, 1, \mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{x}{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{wj}} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]
        12. distribute-rgt-inN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1}, 1, \mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{x}{\color{blue}{e^{wj} \cdot \left(1 + wj\right)}}\right)\right) \]
        13. *-commutativeN/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1}, 1, \mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{x}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + wj\right) \cdot e^{wj}}}\right)\right) \]
        14. associate-/r*N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1}, 1, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{e^{wj}}}\right)\right) \]
        15. distribute-neg-frac2N/A

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1}, 1, \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{1 + wj}}{\mathsf{neg}\left(e^{wj}\right)}}\right) \]
      4. Applied rewrites98.5%

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1}, 1, \frac{\frac{x}{wj + 1}}{-e^{wj}}\right)} \]
      5. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites98.5%

          \[\leadsto wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{-1 - wj}, \color{blue}{e^{-wj}}, \frac{wj}{1 + wj}\right) \]
      6. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      7. Final simplification99.1%

        \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{e^{wj} \cdot wj - x}{e^{wj} \cdot wj + e^{wj}} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{x}{-1 - wj}, e^{-wj}, \frac{wj}{wj - -1}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
      8. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 2: 81.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\ t_1 := wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}}\\ t_2 := wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-230}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x)
       :precision binary64
       (let* ((t_0 (* (exp wj) wj))
              (t_1 (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ t_0 (exp wj)))))
              (t_2 (- wj (- x))))
         (if (<= t_1 -4e-230) t_2 (if (<= t_1 0.0) (* wj wj) t_2))))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	double t_0 = exp(wj) * wj;
      	double t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)));
      	double t_2 = wj - -x;
      	double tmp;
      	if (t_1 <= -4e-230) {
      		tmp = t_2;
      	} else if (t_1 <= 0.0) {
      		tmp = wj * wj;
      	} else {
      		tmp = t_2;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      real(8) function code(wj, x)
          real(8), intent (in) :: wj
          real(8), intent (in) :: x
          real(8) :: t_0
          real(8) :: t_1
          real(8) :: t_2
          real(8) :: tmp
          t_0 = exp(wj) * wj
          t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)))
          t_2 = wj - -x
          if (t_1 <= (-4d-230)) then
              tmp = t_2
          else if (t_1 <= 0.0d0) then
              tmp = wj * wj
          else
              tmp = t_2
          end if
          code = tmp
      end function
      
      public static double code(double wj, double x) {
      	double t_0 = Math.exp(wj) * wj;
      	double t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + Math.exp(wj)));
      	double t_2 = wj - -x;
      	double tmp;
      	if (t_1 <= -4e-230) {
      		tmp = t_2;
      	} else if (t_1 <= 0.0) {
      		tmp = wj * wj;
      	} else {
      		tmp = t_2;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      def code(wj, x):
      	t_0 = math.exp(wj) * wj
      	t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + math.exp(wj)))
      	t_2 = wj - -x
      	tmp = 0
      	if t_1 <= -4e-230:
      		tmp = t_2
      	elif t_1 <= 0.0:
      		tmp = wj * wj
      	else:
      		tmp = t_2
      	return tmp
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	t_0 = Float64(exp(wj) * wj)
      	t_1 = Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(t_0 + exp(wj))))
      	t_2 = Float64(wj - Float64(-x))
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (t_1 <= -4e-230)
      		tmp = t_2;
      	elseif (t_1 <= 0.0)
      		tmp = Float64(wj * wj);
      	else
      		tmp = t_2;
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
      	t_0 = exp(wj) * wj;
      	t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)));
      	t_2 = wj - -x;
      	tmp = 0.0;
      	if (t_1 <= -4e-230)
      		tmp = t_2;
      	elseif (t_1 <= 0.0)
      		tmp = wj * wj;
      	else
      		tmp = t_2;
      	end
      	tmp_2 = tmp;
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(wj - (-x)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -4e-230], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 0.0], N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\
      t_1 := wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}}\\
      t_2 := wj - \left(-x\right)\\
      \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-230}:\\
      \;\;\;\;t\_2\\
      
      \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 0:\\
      \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;t\_2\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < -4.00000000000000019e-230 or 0.0 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

        1. Initial program 94.8%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. mul-1-negN/A

            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)} \]
          2. lower-neg.f6487.8

            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
        5. Applied rewrites87.8%

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]

        if -4.00000000000000019e-230 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 0.0

        1. Initial program 6.2%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
        4. Applied rewrites100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
        5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} \]
        6. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites39.4%

            \[\leadsto \left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot wj\right)} \]
          2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \]
          3. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites39.4%

              \[\leadsto wj \cdot wj \]
          4. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
          5. Final simplification79.1%

            \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{e^{wj} \cdot wj - x}{e^{wj} \cdot wj + e^{wj}} \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-230}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj - \frac{e^{wj} \cdot wj - x}{e^{wj} \cdot wj + e^{wj}} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
          6. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 3: 96.8% accurate, 7.5× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x)
           :precision binary64
           (fma
            (fma
             (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
             wj
             (* -2.0 x))
            wj
            x))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
          }
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 78.9%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
          4. Applied rewrites97.2%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
          5. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 4: 96.6% accurate, 15.8× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (fma (- 1.0 wj) wj (* -2.0 x)) wj x))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	return fma(fma((1.0 - wj), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
          }
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	return fma(fma(Float64(1.0 - wj), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 78.9%

            \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
          4. Applied rewrites97.2%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
          5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

            \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
          6. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites96.9%

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
            2. Add Preprocessing

            Alternative 5: 96.1% accurate, 22.1× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* (- 1.0 wj) wj) wj x))
            double code(double wj, double x) {
            	return fma(((1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x);
            }
            
            function code(wj, x)
            	return fma(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x)
            end
            
            code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right)
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 78.9%

              \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
            2. Add Preprocessing
            3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
            4. Applied rewrites97.2%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
            5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

              \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
            6. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites96.9%

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - wj, wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \]
              2. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
              3. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites96.5%

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
                2. Add Preprocessing

                Alternative 6: 85.1% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

                \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \end{array} \]
                (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* x wj) -2.0 x))
                double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return fma((x * wj), -2.0, x);
                }
                
                function code(wj, x)
                	return fma(Float64(x * wj), -2.0, x)
                end
                
                code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]
                
                \begin{array}{l}
                
                \\
                \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)
                \end{array}
                
                Derivation
                1. Initial program 78.9%

                  \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing
                3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
                4. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. +-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
                  2. *-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right) \cdot -2} + x \]
                  3. lower-fma.f64N/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
                  4. lower-*.f6487.8

                    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot x}, -2, x\right) \]
                5. Applied rewrites87.8%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
                6. Final simplification87.8%

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \]
                7. Add Preprocessing

                Alternative 7: 13.9% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

                \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj \cdot wj \end{array} \]
                (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* wj wj))
                double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return wj * wj;
                }
                
                real(8) function code(wj, x)
                    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                    real(8), intent (in) :: x
                    code = wj * wj
                end function
                
                public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return wj * wj;
                }
                
                def code(wj, x):
                	return wj * wj
                
                function code(wj, x)
                	return Float64(wj * wj)
                end
                
                function tmp = code(wj, x)
                	tmp = wj * wj;
                end
                
                code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]
                
                \begin{array}{l}
                
                \\
                wj \cdot wj
                \end{array}
                
                Derivation
                1. Initial program 78.9%

                  \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing
                3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                4. Applied rewrites97.2%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                  \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} \]
                6. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. Applied rewrites11.5%

                    \[\leadsto \left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot wj\right)} \]
                  2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                    \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \]
                  3. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. Applied rewrites11.0%

                      \[\leadsto wj \cdot wj \]
                    2. Add Preprocessing

                    Alternative 8: 4.1% accurate, 82.8× speedup?

                    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - 1 \end{array} \]
                    (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (- wj 1.0))
                    double code(double wj, double x) {
                    	return wj - 1.0;
                    }
                    
                    real(8) function code(wj, x)
                        real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                        real(8), intent (in) :: x
                        code = wj - 1.0d0
                    end function
                    
                    public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                    	return wj - 1.0;
                    }
                    
                    def code(wj, x):
                    	return wj - 1.0
                    
                    function code(wj, x)
                    	return Float64(wj - 1.0)
                    end
                    
                    function tmp = code(wj, x)
                    	tmp = wj - 1.0;
                    end
                    
                    code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]
                    
                    \begin{array}{l}
                    
                    \\
                    wj - 1
                    \end{array}
                    
                    Derivation
                    1. Initial program 78.9%

                      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                    2. Add Preprocessing
                    3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
                    4. Step-by-step derivation
                      1. Applied rewrites4.1%

                        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
                      2. Add Preprocessing

                      Developer Target 1: 78.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

                      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
                      (FPCore (wj x)
                       :precision binary64
                       (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
                      double code(double wj, double x) {
                      	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                      }
                      
                      real(8) function code(wj, x)
                          real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                          real(8), intent (in) :: x
                          code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
                      end function
                      
                      public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                      	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
                      }
                      
                      def code(wj, x):
                      	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
                      
                      function code(wj, x)
                      	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
                      end
                      
                      function tmp = code(wj, x)
                      	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                      end
                      
                      code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
                      
                      \begin{array}{l}
                      
                      \\
                      wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
                      \end{array}
                      

                      Reproduce

                      ?
                      herbie shell --seed 2024259 
                      (FPCore (wj x)
                        :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
                        :precision binary64
                      
                        :alt
                        (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
                      
                        (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))