Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.9% → 99.0%

Time: 4.7s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.2×

• 33.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma z t (fma b a (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(z, t, fma(b, a, (x * y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(z, t, fma(b, a, Float64(x * y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(z * t + N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.2%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right) \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y}\right) \]

   8. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + x \cdot y\right) \]

   9. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y\right) \]

   10. lower-fma.f64 98.8

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

   11. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

   12. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   13. lower-*.f64 98.8

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -1e+52) t_1 (if (<= (* a b) 4e+83) (fma z t (* x y)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1e+52) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e+83) {
		tmp = fma(z, t, (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -1e+52)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 4e+83)
		tmp = fma(z, t, Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -1e+52], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4e+83], N[(z * t + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -9.9999999999999999e51 or 4.00000000000000012e83 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 86.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e51 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.00000000000000012e83

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + a \cdot b \]

      4. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y}\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{a \cdot b} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      9. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y\right) \]

      10. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      11. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

      12. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      13. lower-*.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      2. lower-*.f64 95.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. Applied rewrites 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -1e+52) t_1 (if (<= (* a b) 4e+83) (fma y x (* t z)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -1e+52) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e+83) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, (t * z));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -1e+52)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 4e+83)
		tmp = fma(y, x, Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -1e+52], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4e+83], N[(y * x + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -9.9999999999999999e51 or 4.00000000000000012e83 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 86.8

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e51 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.00000000000000012e83

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + t \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + t \cdot z \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right) \]

      5. lower-*.f64 94.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z \cdot t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma b a (* t z))))
   (if (<= (* t z) -2.5e-16)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* t z) 2.05e-49) (fma b a (* x y)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, (t * z));
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -2.5e-16) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 2.05e-49) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(b, a, Float64(t * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -2.5e-16)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 2.05e-49)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * a + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -2.5e-16], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 2.05e-49], N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -2.5000000000000002e-16 or 2.0500000000000001e-49 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + t \cdot z \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 84.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, z \cdot t\right)} \]

   if -2.5000000000000002e-16 < (*.f64 z t) < 2.0500000000000001e-49

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 92.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, t \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 80.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* t z) -5.4e+130)
   (* t z)
   (if (<= (* t z) 6.5e+86) (fma b a (* x y)) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t * z) <= -5.4e+130) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if ((t * z) <= 6.5e+86) {
		tmp = fma(b, a, (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t * z) <= -5.4e+130)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (Float64(t * z) <= 6.5e+86)
		tmp = fma(b, a, Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], -5.4e+130], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], 6.5e+86], N[(b * a + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -5.3999999999999997e130 or 6.49999999999999996e86 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 73.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   if -5.3999999999999997e130 < (*.f64 z t) < 6.49999999999999996e86

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} + x \cdot y \]

      2. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. lower-*.f64 81.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, \color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \cdot z \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \cdot z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+86}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 54.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -4e+37) (* a b) (if (<= (* a b) 4e+83) (* t z) (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -4e+37) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e+83) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-4d+37)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= 4d+83) then
        tmp = t * z
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -4e+37) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 4e+83) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -4e+37:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= 4e+83:
		tmp = t * z
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -4e+37)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 4e+83)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -4e+37)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 4e+83)
		tmp = t * z;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -4e+37], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 4e+83], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -3.99999999999999982e37 or 4.00000000000000012e83 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 69.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

   if -3.99999999999999982e37 < (*.f64 a b) < 4.00000000000000012e83

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 58.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 54.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -2e+46) (* x y) (if (<= (* x y) 2e+93) (* a b) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+46) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+93) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-2d+46)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if ((x * y) <= 2d+93) then
        tmp = a * b
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+46) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 2e+93) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -2e+46:
		tmp = x * y
	elif (x * y) <= 2e+93:
		tmp = a * b
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2e+46)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 2e+93)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+46)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif ((x * y) <= 2e+93)
		tmp = a * b;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+46], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+93], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2e46 or 2.00000000000000009e93 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 69.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -2e46 < (*.f64 x y) < 2.00000000000000009e93

   1. Initial program 99.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 49.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 49.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 35.5% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.2%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 36.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

5. Applied rewrites 36.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot a} \]

6. Final simplification 36.7%

   \[\leadsto a \cdot b \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024255 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))