Linear.V3:cross from linear-1.19.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.1% → 99.4%

Time: 2.8s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 24.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z \cdot \left(-t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma y x (* z (- t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, x, (z * -t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, x, Float64(z * Float64(-t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * x + N[(z * (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift--.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - z \cdot t} \]

   2. sub-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right) \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

   6. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

   7. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

   8. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) \]

   9. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) \]

   10. lower-neg.f64 99.2

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \color{blue}{\left(-t\right)} \cdot z\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, \left(-t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z \cdot \left(-t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 76.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(-t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 100:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (- t))))
   (if (<= (* z t) -2000000.0) t_1 (if (<= (* z t) 100.0) (* x y) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * -t;
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -2000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 100.0) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = z * -t
    if ((z * t) <= (-2000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((z * t) <= 100.0d0) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * -t;
	double tmp;
	if ((z * t) <= -2000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((z * t) <= 100.0) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = z * -t
	tmp = 0
	if (z * t) <= -2000000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (z * t) <= 100.0:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(-t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(z * t) <= -2000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(z * t) <= 100.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = z * -t;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z * t) <= -2000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((z * t) <= 100.0)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * (-t)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], -2000000.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], 100.0], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 z t) < -2e6 or 100 < (*.f64 z t)

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(t\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. lower-neg.f64 79.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-t\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -2e6 < (*.f64 z t) < 100

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 83.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \cdot t \leq -2000000:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \cdot t \leq 100:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y - z \cdot t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x y) (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * y) - (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * y) - (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * y) - (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * y) - (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 52.4% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x \cdot y - z \cdot t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 51.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

5. Applied rewrites 51.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 51.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot y \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024255 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Linear.V3:cross from linear-1.19.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* x y) (* z t)))