Statistics.Distribution.Poisson:$clogProbability from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 9.4s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * Math.log(y)) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * math.log(y)) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * log(y)) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\log y \cdot x - z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- (* (log y) x) z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((log(y) * x) - z) - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((log(y) * x) - z) - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((Math.log(y) * x) - z) - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((math.log(y) * x) - z) - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(y) * x) - z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((log(y) * x) - z) - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot x - z\right) - y \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 - z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+83}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0 - y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (log y) x)))
   (if (<= x -2.5e+65) (- t_0 z) (if (<= x 5e+83) (- (- z) y) (- t_0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = log(y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.5e+65) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else if (x <= 5e+83) {
		tmp = -z - y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = log(y) * x
    if (x <= (-2.5d+65)) then
        tmp = t_0 - z
    else if (x <= 5d+83) then
        tmp = -z - y
    else
        tmp = t_0 - y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = Math.log(y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.5e+65) {
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	} else if (x <= 5e+83) {
		tmp = -z - y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0 - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = math.log(y) * x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.5e+65:
		tmp = t_0 - z
	elif x <= 5e+83:
		tmp = -z - y
	else:
		tmp = t_0 - y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(log(y) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.5e+65)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 - z);
	elseif (x <= 5e+83)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_0 - y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = log(y) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.5e+65)
		tmp = t_0 - z;
	elseif (x <= 5e+83)
		tmp = -z - y;
	else
		tmp = t_0 - y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -2.5e+65], N[(t$95$0 - z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 5e+83], N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$0 - y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.49999999999999986e65

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - z} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - z \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - z \]

      4. lower-log.f64 86.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y} \cdot x - z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x - z} \]

   if -2.49999999999999986e65 < x < 5.00000000000000029e83

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} - y \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - y \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 91.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

   if 5.00000000000000029e83 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - y \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - y \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - y \]

      3. lower-log.f64 95.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y} \cdot x - y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - y \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log y \cdot x - z\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+106}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (* (log y) x) z)))
   (if (<= x -2.5e+65) t_0 (if (<= x 7.8e+106) (- (- z) y) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (log(y) * x) - z;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.5e+65) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 7.8e+106) {
		tmp = -z - y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (log(y) * x) - z
    if (x <= (-2.5d+65)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 7.8d+106) then
        tmp = -z - y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (Math.log(y) * x) - z;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.5e+65) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 7.8e+106) {
		tmp = -z - y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (math.log(y) * x) - z
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.5e+65:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 7.8e+106:
		tmp = -z - y
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(log(y) * x) - z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.5e+65)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 7.8e+106)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (log(y) * x) - z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.5e+65)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 7.8e+106)
		tmp = -z - y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -2.5e+65], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 7.8e+106], N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.49999999999999986e65 or 7.79999999999999937e106 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower--.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y - z} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - z \]

      3. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - z \]

      4. lower-log.f64 83.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y} \cdot x - z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x - z} \]

   if -2.49999999999999986e65 < x < 7.79999999999999937e106

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} - y \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - y \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 91.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 79.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \log y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.2 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-z\right) - y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (log y) x)))
   (if (<= x -3.2e+65) t_0 (if (<= x 1.7e+110) (- (- z) y) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = log(y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.2e+65) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 1.7e+110) {
		tmp = -z - y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = log(y) * x
    if (x <= (-3.2d+65)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 1.7d+110) then
        tmp = -z - y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = Math.log(y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.2e+65) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 1.7e+110) {
		tmp = -z - y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = math.log(y) * x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.2e+65:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 1.7e+110:
		tmp = -z - y
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(log(y) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.2e+65)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 1.7e+110)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-z) - y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = log(y) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.2e+65)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 1.7e+110)
		tmp = -z - y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -3.2e+65], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 1.7e+110], N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.20000000000000007e65 or 1.7000000000000001e110 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

      3. lower-log.f64 72.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} \]

   if -3.20000000000000007e65 < x < 1.7000000000000001e110

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} - y \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - y \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 91.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 50.9% accurate, 12.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.05e-44) (- z) (- y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.05e-44) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.05d-44) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.05e-44) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.05e-44:
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.05e-44)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.05e-44)
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.05e-44], (-z), (-y)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.05000000000000001e-44

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)} \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 53.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if 1.05000000000000001e-44 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)} \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 58.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 66.4% accurate, 18.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-z\right) - y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (- z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z - y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z - y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z - y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z - y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(-z) - y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z - y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[((-z) - y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} - y \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} - y \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 68.7

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]

5. Applied rewrites 68.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} - y \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 33.8% accurate, 37.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-y)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)} \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 36.1

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 36.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 2.3% accurate, 112.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot \log y - z\right) - y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)} \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 36.1

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 36.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 2.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024249 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Poisson:$clogProbability from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (- (* x (log y)) z) y))