Complex division, real part

Percentage Accurate: 61.8% → 79.9%

Time: 8.3s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.6×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (* a c) (* b d)) (+ (* c c) (* d d))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	return ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, c, d)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: d
    code = ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	return ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d));
}

Python

def code(a, b, c, d):
	return ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d))

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(a * c) + Float64(b * d)) / Float64(Float64(c * c) + Float64(d * d)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := N[(N[(N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * d), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(c * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(d * d), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 61.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (* a c) (* b d)) (+ (* c c) (* d d))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	return ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, c, d)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: d
    code = ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	return ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d));
}

Python

def code(a, b, c, d):
	return ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d))

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(a * c) + Float64(b * d)) / Float64(Float64(c * c) + Float64(d * d)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = ((a * c) + (b * d)) / ((c * c) + (d * d));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := N[(N[(N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * d), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(c * c), $MachinePrecision] + N[(d * d), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 79.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+131}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{d \cdot b + a \cdot c}{d \cdot d + c \cdot c}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{c}{d}, a, b\right)}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (fma (/ b c) d a) c)))
   (if (<= c -3e+131)
     t_0
     (if (<= c -1e-90)
       (/ (+ (* d b) (* a c)) (+ (* d d) (* c c)))
       (if (<= c 1.8e+73) (/ (fma (/ c d) a b) d) t_0)))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double t_0 = fma((b / c), d, a) / c;
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3e+131) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (c <= -1e-90) {
		tmp = ((d * b) + (a * c)) / ((d * d) + (c * c));
	} else if (c <= 1.8e+73) {
		tmp = fma((c / d), a, b) / d;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	t_0 = Float64(fma(Float64(b / c), d, a) / c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -3e+131)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (c <= -1e-90)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(d * b) + Float64(a * c)) / Float64(Float64(d * d) + Float64(c * c)));
	elseif (c <= 1.8e+73)
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(c / d), a, b) / d);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(b / c), $MachinePrecision] * d + a), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -3e+131], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[c, -1e-90], N[(N[(N[(d * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(d * d), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 1.8e+73], N[(N[(N[(c / d), $MachinePrecision] * a + b), $MachinePrecision] / d), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -3.0000000000000001e131 or 1.7999999999999999e73 < c

   1. Initial program 37.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot d}{c} + a}}{c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot b}}{c} + a}{c} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot \frac{b}{c}} + a}{c} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c} \cdot d} + a}{c} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}}{c} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 92.9

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c}}, d, a\right)}{c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}} \]

   if -3.0000000000000001e131 < c < -9.99999999999999995e-91

   1. Initial program 84.5%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -9.99999999999999995e-91 < c < 1.7999999999999999e73

   1. Initial program 63.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot d}{c} + a}}{c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot b}}{c} + a}{c} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot \frac{b}{c}} + a}{c} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c} \cdot d} + a}{c} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}}{c} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 25.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c}}, d, a\right)}{c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 25.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in d around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot c}{d} + b}}{d} \]

      3. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{c}{d}} + b}{d} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{c}{d} \cdot a} + b}{d} \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{c}{d}, a, b\right)}}{d} \]

      6. lower-/.f64 88.0

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{c}{d}}, a, b\right)}{d} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{c}{d}, a, b\right)}{d}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+131}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{d \cdot b + a \cdot c}{d \cdot d + c \cdot c}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{c}{d}, a, b\right)}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 77.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{c}{d}, a, b\right)}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (fma (/ b c) d a) c)))
   (if (<= c -3.8e-5) t_0 (if (<= c 1.8e+73) (/ (fma (/ c d) a b) d) t_0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double t_0 = fma((b / c), d, a) / c;
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3.8e-5) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (c <= 1.8e+73) {
		tmp = fma((c / d), a, b) / d;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	t_0 = Float64(fma(Float64(b / c), d, a) / c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -3.8e-5)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (c <= 1.8e+73)
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(c / d), a, b) / d);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(b / c), $MachinePrecision] * d + a), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -3.8e-5], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[c, 1.8e+73], N[(N[(N[(c / d), $MachinePrecision] * a + b), $MachinePrecision] / d), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -3.8000000000000002e-5 or 1.7999999999999999e73 < c

   1. Initial program 47.9%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot d}{c} + a}}{c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot b}}{c} + a}{c} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot \frac{b}{c}} + a}{c} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c} \cdot d} + a}{c} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}}{c} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 89.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c}}, d, a\right)}{c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}} \]

   if -3.8000000000000002e-5 < c < 1.7999999999999999e73

   1. Initial program 65.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot d}{c} + a}}{c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot b}}{c} + a}{c} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot \frac{b}{c}} + a}{c} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c} \cdot d} + a}{c} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}}{c} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 25.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c}}, d, a\right)}{c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in d around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot c}{d} + b}}{d} \]

      3. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{c}{d}} + b}{d} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{c}{d} \cdot a} + b}{d} \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{c}{d}, a, b\right)}}{d} \]

      6. lower-/.f64 85.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{c}{d}}, a, b\right)}{d} \]

   8. Applied rewrites 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{c}{d}, a, b\right)}{d}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 76.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{a}{d}, c, b\right)}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (fma (/ b c) d a) c)))
   (if (<= c -3.8e-5) t_0 (if (<= c 1.8e+73) (/ (fma (/ a d) c b) d) t_0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double t_0 = fma((b / c), d, a) / c;
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3.8e-5) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (c <= 1.8e+73) {
		tmp = fma((a / d), c, b) / d;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	t_0 = Float64(fma(Float64(b / c), d, a) / c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -3.8e-5)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (c <= 1.8e+73)
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(a / d), c, b) / d);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(b / c), $MachinePrecision] * d + a), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -3.8e-5], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[c, 1.8e+73], N[(N[(N[(a / d), $MachinePrecision] * c + b), $MachinePrecision] / d), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -3.8000000000000002e-5 or 1.7999999999999999e73 < c

   1. Initial program 47.9%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot d}{c} + a}}{c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot b}}{c} + a}{c} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot \frac{b}{c}} + a}{c} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c} \cdot d} + a}{c} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}}{c} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 89.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c}}, d, a\right)}{c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}} \]

   if -3.8000000000000002e-5 < c < 1.7999999999999999e73

   1. Initial program 65.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in d around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot c}{d} + b}}{d} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{c \cdot a}}{d} + b}{d} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{a}{d}} + b}{d} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a}{d} \cdot c} + b}{d} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{a}{d}, c, b\right)}}{d} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 82.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{a}{d}}, c, b\right)}{d} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{a}{d}, c, b\right)}{d}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 76.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, \frac{d}{c}, a\right)}{c}\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{+73}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{a}{d}, c, b\right)}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (fma b (/ d c) a) c)))
   (if (<= c -3.8e-5) t_0 (if (<= c 1.8e+73) (/ (fma (/ a d) c b) d) t_0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double t_0 = fma(b, (d / c), a) / c;
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -3.8e-5) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (c <= 1.8e+73) {
		tmp = fma((a / d), c, b) / d;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	t_0 = Float64(fma(b, Float64(d / c), a) / c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -3.8e-5)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (c <= 1.8e+73)
		tmp = Float64(fma(Float64(a / d), c, b) / d);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(b * N[(d / c), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -3.8e-5], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[c, 1.8e+73], N[(N[(N[(a / d), $MachinePrecision] * c + b), $MachinePrecision] / d), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -3.8000000000000002e-5 or 1.7999999999999999e73 < c

   1. Initial program 47.9%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot d}{c} + a}}{c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot b}}{c} + a}{c} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot \frac{b}{c}} + a}{c} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c} \cdot d} + a}{c} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}}{c} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 89.4

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c}}, d, a\right)}{c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, \frac{d}{c}, a\right)}{c} \]

   if -3.8000000000000002e-5 < c < 1.7999999999999999e73

   1. Initial program 65.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in d around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + \frac{a \cdot c}{d}}{d}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot c}{d} + b}}{d} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{c \cdot a}}{d} + b}{d} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{a}{d}} + b}{d} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a}{d} \cdot c} + b}{d} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{a}{d}, c, b\right)}}{d} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 82.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{a}{d}}, c, b\right)}{d} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{a}{d}, c, b\right)}{d}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 70.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, \frac{d}{c}, a\right)}{c}\\ \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (fma b (/ d c) a) c)))
   (if (<= c -6e-11) t_0 (if (<= c 1.4e-28) (/ b d) t_0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double t_0 = fma(b, (d / c), a) / c;
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -6e-11) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (c <= 1.4e-28) {
		tmp = b / d;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	t_0 = Float64(fma(b, Float64(d / c), a) / c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -6e-11)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (c <= 1.4e-28)
		tmp = Float64(b / d);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(b * N[(d / c), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[c, -6e-11], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[c, 1.4e-28], N[(b / d), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -6e-11 or 1.3999999999999999e-28 < c

   1. Initial program 49.4%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + \frac{b \cdot d}{c}}{c}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot d}{c} + a}}{c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot b}}{c} + a}{c} \]

      4. associate-/l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{d \cdot \frac{b}{c}} + a}{c} \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c} \cdot d} + a}{c} \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}}{c} \]

      7. lower-/.f64 84.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{b}{c}}, d, a\right)}{c} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{b}{c}, d, a\right)}{c}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, \frac{d}{c}, a\right)}{c} \]

   if -6e-11 < c < 1.3999999999999999e-28

   1. Initial program 65.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 73.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 65.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{+132}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{c}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq -6 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, a, d \cdot b\right)}{c \cdot c}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 5.7 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{c}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= c -1.5e+132)
   (/ a c)
   (if (<= c -6e-11)
     (/ (fma c a (* d b)) (* c c))
     (if (<= c 5.7e+23) (/ b d) (/ a c)))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -1.5e+132) {
		tmp = a / c;
	} else if (c <= -6e-11) {
		tmp = fma(c, a, (d * b)) / (c * c);
	} else if (c <= 5.7e+23) {
		tmp = b / d;
	} else {
		tmp = a / c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -1.5e+132)
		tmp = Float64(a / c);
	elseif (c <= -6e-11)
		tmp = Float64(fma(c, a, Float64(d * b)) / Float64(c * c));
	elseif (c <= 5.7e+23)
		tmp = Float64(b / d);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / c);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := If[LessEqual[c, -1.5e+132], N[(a / c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, -6e-11], N[(N[(c * a + N[(d * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(c * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 5.7e+23], N[(b / d), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / c), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if c < -1.4999999999999999e132 or 5.7e23 < c

   1. Initial program 39.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 69.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]

   if -1.4999999999999999e132 < c < -6e-11

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{\color{blue}{{c}^{2}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{\color{blue}{c \cdot c}} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 75.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{\color{blue}{c \cdot c}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{\color{blue}{c \cdot c}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}}{c \cdot c} \]

      2. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot c} + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{c \cdot a} + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 75.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, a, b \cdot d\right)}}{c \cdot c} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, a, \color{blue}{b \cdot d}\right)}{c \cdot c} \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, a, \color{blue}{d \cdot b}\right)}{c \cdot c} \]

      7. lower-*.f64 75.7

         \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, a, \color{blue}{d \cdot b}\right)}{c \cdot c} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 75.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, a, d \cdot b\right)}}{c \cdot c} \]

   if -6e-11 < c < 5.7e23

   1. Initial program 65.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 71.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 64.3% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{c}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \leq 5.7 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b}{d}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{c}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= c -1.9e-10) (/ a c) (if (<= c 5.7e+23) (/ b d) (/ a c))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -1.9e-10) {
		tmp = a / c;
	} else if (c <= 5.7e+23) {
		tmp = b / d;
	} else {
		tmp = a / c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, c, d)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: d
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (c <= (-1.9d-10)) then
        tmp = a / c
    else if (c <= 5.7d+23) then
        tmp = b / d
    else
        tmp = a / c
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double tmp;
	if (c <= -1.9e-10) {
		tmp = a / c;
	} else if (c <= 5.7e+23) {
		tmp = b / d;
	} else {
		tmp = a / c;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, c, d):
	tmp = 0
	if c <= -1.9e-10:
		tmp = a / c
	elif c <= 5.7e+23:
		tmp = b / d
	else:
		tmp = a / c
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (c <= -1.9e-10)
		tmp = Float64(a / c);
	elseif (c <= 5.7e+23)
		tmp = Float64(b / d);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / c);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (c <= -1.9e-10)
		tmp = a / c;
	elseif (c <= 5.7e+23)
		tmp = b / d;
	else
		tmp = a / c;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := If[LessEqual[c, -1.9e-10], N[(a / c), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[c, 5.7e+23], N[(b / d), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / c), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.8999999999999999e-10 or 5.7e23 < c

   1. Initial program 48.9%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 67.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]

   if -1.8999999999999999e-10 < c < 5.7e23

   1. Initial program 65.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 71.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b}{d}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 43.0% accurate, 3.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{c} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d) :precision binary64 (/ a c))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	return a / c;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, c, d)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: d
    code = a / c
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	return a / c;
}

Python

def code(a, b, c, d):
	return a / c

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	return Float64(a / c)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = a / c;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := N[(a / c), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 57.3%

   \[\frac{a \cdot c + b \cdot d}{c \cdot c + d \cdot d} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in c around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 40.6

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 40.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{c}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left|d\right| < \left|c\right|:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a + b \cdot \frac{d}{c}}{c + d \cdot \frac{d}{c}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{b + a \cdot \frac{c}{d}}{d + c \cdot \frac{c}{d}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b c d)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (fabs d) (fabs c))
   (/ (+ a (* b (/ d c))) (+ c (* d (/ d c))))
   (/ (+ b (* a (/ c d))) (+ d (* c (/ c d))))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double tmp;
	if (fabs(d) < fabs(c)) {
		tmp = (a + (b * (d / c))) / (c + (d * (d / c)));
	} else {
		tmp = (b + (a * (c / d))) / (d + (c * (c / d)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, c, d)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: d
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (abs(d) < abs(c)) then
        tmp = (a + (b * (d / c))) / (c + (d * (d / c)))
    else
        tmp = (b + (a * (c / d))) / (d + (c * (c / d)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double c, double d) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.abs(d) < Math.abs(c)) {
		tmp = (a + (b * (d / c))) / (c + (d * (d / c)));
	} else {
		tmp = (b + (a * (c / d))) / (d + (c * (c / d)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, c, d):
	tmp = 0
	if math.fabs(d) < math.fabs(c):
		tmp = (a + (b * (d / c))) / (c + (d * (d / c)))
	else:
		tmp = (b + (a * (c / d))) / (d + (c * (c / d)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (abs(d) < abs(c))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * Float64(d / c))) / Float64(c + Float64(d * Float64(d / c))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(b + Float64(a * Float64(c / d))) / Float64(d + Float64(c * Float64(c / d))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, c, d)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (abs(d) < abs(c))
		tmp = (a + (b * (d / c))) / (c + (d * (d / c)));
	else
		tmp = (b + (a * (c / d))) / (d + (c * (c / d)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, c_, d_] := If[Less[N[Abs[d], $MachinePrecision], N[Abs[c], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a + N[(b * N[(d / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(c + N[(d * N[(d / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b + N[(a * N[(c / d), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(d + N[(c * N[(c / d), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024248 
(FPCore (a b c d)
  :name "Complex division, real part"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< (fabs d) (fabs c)) (/ (+ a (* b (/ d c))) (+ c (* d (/ d c)))) (/ (+ b (* a (/ c d))) (+ d (* c (/ c d))))))

  (/ (+ (* a c) (* b d)) (+ (* c c) (* d d))))