SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.0s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.2×

• 20.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (- z x) y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((z - x), y, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(z - x), y, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] * y + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} + x \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} + x \]

   5. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right)} \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - x, y, x\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.6% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(-x\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+92}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+145}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- x) y)))
   (if (<= y -1.15e+92)
     t_0
     (if (<= y -1.6e-52)
       (* y z)
       (if (<= y 4.1e-42) (* 1.0 x) (if (<= y 1.35e+145) (* y z) t_0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -x * y;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+92) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -1.6e-52) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 4.1e-42) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else if (y <= 1.35e+145) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = -x * y
    if (y <= (-1.15d+92)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= (-1.6d-52)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (y <= 4.1d-42) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else if (y <= 1.35d+145) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = -x * y;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+92) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= -1.6e-52) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 4.1e-42) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else if (y <= 1.35e+145) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = -x * y
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.15e+92:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= -1.6e-52:
		tmp = y * z
	elif y <= 4.1e-42:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	elif y <= 1.35e+145:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(-x) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.15e+92)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -1.6e-52)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= 4.1e-42)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	elseif (y <= 1.35e+145)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = -x * y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.15e+92)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= -1.6e-52)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (y <= 4.1e-42)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	elseif (y <= 1.35e+145)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[((-x) * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.15e+92], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, -1.6e-52], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.1e-42], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.35e+145], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.14999999999999999e92 or 1.35000000000000011e145 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-x\right) \cdot y \]

   if -1.14999999999999999e92 < y < -1.60000000000000005e-52 or 4.1000000000000001e-42 < y < 1.35000000000000011e145

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 67.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 67.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.60000000000000005e-52 < y < 4.1000000000000001e-42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 81.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 81.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+92}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+145}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-x\right) \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (- z x))))
   (if (<= y -1.0) t_0 (if (<= y 8.5e-9) (+ (* y z) x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (z - x);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 8.5e-9) {
		tmp = (y * z) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * (z - x)
    if (y <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 8.5d-9) then
        tmp = (y * z) + x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (z - x);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 8.5e-9) {
		tmp = (y * z) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * (z - x)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 8.5e-9:
		tmp = (y * z) + x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(z - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 8.5e-9)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * z) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * (z - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 8.5e-9)
		tmp = (y * z) + x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 8.5e-9], N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 8.5e-9 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 98.7

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -1 < y < 8.5e-9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 99.3

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (- z x))))
   (if (<= y -1.55e-52) t_0 (if (<= y 5.2e-42) (* 1.0 x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (z - x);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.55e-52) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 5.2e-42) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * (z - x)
    if (y <= (-1.55d-52)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 5.2d-42) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (z - x);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.55e-52) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 5.2e-42) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * (z - x)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.55e-52:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 5.2e-42:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(z - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.55e-52)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 5.2e-42)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * (z - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.55e-52)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 5.2e-42)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.55e-52], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 5.2e-42], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.5499999999999999e-52 or 5.2e-42 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. lower--.f64 95.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - x\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -1.5499999999999999e-52 < y < 5.2e-42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 81.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 81.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 73.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(1 - y\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-127}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- 1.0 y) x)))
   (if (<= x -5.5e-127) t_0 (if (<= x 2.05e-198) (* y z) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 - y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.5e-127) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 2.05e-198) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (1.0d0 - y) * x
    if (x <= (-5.5d-127)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 2.05d-198) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (1.0 - y) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.5e-127) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 2.05e-198) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (1.0 - y) * x
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.5e-127:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 2.05e-198:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.5e-127)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 2.05e-198)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (1.0 - y) * x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.5e-127)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 2.05e-198)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -5.5e-127], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 2.05e-198], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.50000000000000036e-127 or 2.05000000000000006e-198 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 77.8

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -5.50000000000000036e-127 < x < 2.05000000000000006e-198

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 85.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-127}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.6e-52) (* y z) (if (<= y 4.1e-42) (* 1.0 x) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.6e-52) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 4.1e-42) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.6d-52)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (y <= 4.1d-42) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 * x
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.6e-52) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 4.1e-42) {
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.6e-52:
		tmp = y * z
	elif y <= 4.1e-42:
		tmp = 1.0 * x
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.6e-52)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= 4.1e-42)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.6e-52)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (y <= 4.1e-42)
		tmp = 1.0 * x;
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.6e-52], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.1e-42], N[(1.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.60000000000000005e-52 or 4.1000000000000001e-42 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 56.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 56.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.60000000000000005e-52 < y < 4.1000000000000001e-42

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x}\right)\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      4. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y + 1\right) \cdot x} \]

      6. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]

      8. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(y\right)\right)}\right) \cdot x \]

      9. unsub-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

      10. lower--.f64 81.1

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 81.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 41.3% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 41.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 41.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

6. Final simplification 41.0%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024244 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))