Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 77.4% → 98.0%
Time: 8.5s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 27.6×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 77.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.0% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \left(\frac{\frac{wj}{1 + wj}}{x} - \frac{e^{-wj}}{1 + wj}\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= wj -3.3e-6)
   (- wj (* (- (/ (/ wj (+ 1.0 wj)) x) (/ (exp (- wj)) (+ 1.0 wj))) x))
   (fma
    (fma
     (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
     wj
     (* -2.0 x))
    wj
    x)))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double tmp;
	if (wj <= -3.3e-6) {
		tmp = wj - ((((wj / (1.0 + wj)) / x) - (exp(-wj) / (1.0 + wj))) * x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(wj, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (wj <= -3.3e-6)
		tmp = Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(1.0 + wj)) / x) - Float64(exp(Float64(-wj)) / Float64(1.0 + wj))) * x));
	else
		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[wj_, x_] := If[LessEqual[wj, -3.3e-6], N[(wj - N[(N[(N[(N[(wj / N[(1.0 + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Exp[(-wj)], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \left(\frac{\frac{wj}{1 + wj}}{x} - \frac{e^{-wj}}{1 + wj}\right) \cdot x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if wj < -3.30000000000000017e-6

    1. Initial program 42.2%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
      2. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right)} \]
      3. neg-sub0N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right) \]
      4. associate-+l-N/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
      5. unsub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
      6. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(0 - \left(\frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)}}\right)\right) \]
      7. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - x \cdot \left(0 - \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{x \cdot \left(e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}\right)} + \frac{1}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites97.9%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{wj}{1 + wj}}{x} - \frac{e^{-wj}}{1 + wj}\right) \cdot x} \]

    if -3.30000000000000017e-6 < wj

    1. Initial program 76.8%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 81.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\ t_1 := wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}}\\ t_2 := wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp wj) wj))
        (t_1 (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ t_0 (exp wj)))))
        (t_2 (- wj (- x))))
   (if (<= t_1 -1e-294) t_2 (if (<= t_1 0.0) (* wj wj) t_2))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = exp(wj) * wj;
	double t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)));
	double t_2 = wj - -x;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e-294) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 <= 0.0) {
		tmp = wj * wj;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = exp(wj) * wj
    t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)))
    t_2 = wj - -x
    if (t_1 <= (-1d-294)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t_1 <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = wj * wj
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = Math.exp(wj) * wj;
	double t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + Math.exp(wj)));
	double t_2 = wj - -x;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -1e-294) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 <= 0.0) {
		tmp = wj * wj;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = math.exp(wj) * wj
	t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + math.exp(wj)))
	t_2 = wj - -x
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -1e-294:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t_1 <= 0.0:
		tmp = wj * wj
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(exp(wj) * wj)
	t_1 = Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(t_0 + exp(wj))))
	t_2 = Float64(wj - Float64(-x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -1e-294)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(wj * wj);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = exp(wj) * wj;
	t_1 = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (t_0 + exp(wj)));
	t_2 = wj - -x;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -1e-294)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 <= 0.0)
		tmp = wj * wj;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(wj - (-x)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e-294], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 0.0], N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{wj} \cdot wj\\
t_1 := wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{t\_0 + e^{wj}}\\
t_2 := wj - \left(-x\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_2\\

\mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 0:\\
\;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < -1.00000000000000002e-294 or 0.0 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)))))

    1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. mul-1-negN/A

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)\right)} \]
      2. lower-neg.f6489.2

        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]
    5. Applied rewrites89.2%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \]

    if -1.00000000000000002e-294 < (-.f64 wj (/.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj)) x) (+.f64 (exp.f64 wj) (*.f64 wj (exp.f64 wj))))) < 0.0

    1. Initial program 5.2%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
    4. Applied rewrites100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites53.0%

        \[\leadsto \left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
      2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

        \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \]
      3. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Applied rewrites53.0%

          \[\leadsto wj \cdot wj \]
      4. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      5. Final simplification81.3%

        \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj - \frac{e^{wj} \cdot wj - x}{e^{wj} \cdot wj + e^{wj}} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-294}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj - \frac{e^{wj} \cdot wj - x}{e^{wj} \cdot wj + e^{wj}} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \left(-x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
      6. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 3: 97.4% accurate, 2.5× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (wj x)
       :precision binary64
       (if (<= wj -0.01)
         (- wj (* (/ (exp (- wj)) (- -1.0 wj)) x))
         (fma
          (fma
           (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
           wj
           (* -2.0 x))
          wj
          x)))
      double code(double wj, double x) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (wj <= -0.01) {
      		tmp = wj - ((exp(-wj) / (-1.0 - wj)) * x);
      	} else {
      		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      function code(wj, x)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (wj <= -0.01)
      		tmp = Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(-wj)) / Float64(-1.0 - wj)) * x));
      	else
      		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      code[wj_, x_] := If[LessEqual[wj, -0.01], N[(wj - N[(N[(N[Exp[(-wj)], $MachinePrecision] / N[(-1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.01:\\
      \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj} \cdot x\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if wj < -0.0100000000000000002

        1. Initial program 37.3%

          \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites2.3%

            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
          2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
          3. Step-by-step derivation
            1. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

              \[\leadsto wj - -1 \cdot \frac{x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
            2. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto wj - -1 \cdot \frac{x}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + wj\right)} \cdot e^{wj}} \]
            3. associate-/l/N/A

              \[\leadsto wj - -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}} \]
            4. associate-*r/N/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}} \]
            5. lower-/.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}} \]
            6. associate-*r/N/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot x}{e^{wj}}}}{1 + wj} \]
            7. lower-/.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot x}{e^{wj}}}}{1 + wj} \]
            8. mul-1-negN/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)}}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj} \]
            9. lower-neg.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-x}}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj} \]
            10. lower-exp.f64N/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{-x}{\color{blue}{e^{wj}}}}{1 + wj} \]
            11. +-commutativeN/A

              \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{-x}{e^{wj}}}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
            12. lower-+.f6487.5

              \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{-x}{e^{wj}}}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
          4. Applied rewrites87.5%

            \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
          5. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites87.7%

              \[\leadsto wj - \left(-x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{-wj}}{1 + wj}} \]

            if -0.0100000000000000002 < wj

            1. Initial program 76.8%

              \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
            2. Add Preprocessing
            3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
            4. Applied rewrites99.2%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
          6. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
          7. Final simplification98.9%

            \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{e^{-wj}}{-1 - wj} \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
          8. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 4: 97.4% accurate, 2.6× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.0076:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{x}{\left(-1 - wj\right) \cdot e^{wj}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (wj x)
           :precision binary64
           (if (<= wj -0.0076)
             (- wj (/ x (* (- -1.0 wj) (exp wj))))
             (fma
              (fma
               (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
               wj
               (* -2.0 x))
              wj
              x)))
          double code(double wj, double x) {
          	double tmp;
          	if (wj <= -0.0076) {
          		tmp = wj - (x / ((-1.0 - wj) * exp(wj)));
          	} else {
          		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
          	}
          	return tmp;
          }
          
          function code(wj, x)
          	tmp = 0.0
          	if (wj <= -0.0076)
          		tmp = Float64(wj - Float64(x / Float64(Float64(-1.0 - wj) * exp(wj))));
          	else
          		tmp = fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
          	end
          	return tmp
          end
          
          code[wj_, x_] := If[LessEqual[wj, -0.0076], N[(wj - N[(x / N[(N[(-1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \begin{array}{l}
          \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.0076:\\
          \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{x}{\left(-1 - wj\right) \cdot e^{wj}}\\
          
          \mathbf{else}:\\
          \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\
          
          
          \end{array}
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Split input into 2 regimes
          2. if wj < -0.00759999999999999998

            1. Initial program 37.3%

              \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
            2. Add Preprocessing
            3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

              \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
            4. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Applied rewrites2.3%

                \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
              2. Taylor expanded in x around inf

                \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
              3. Step-by-step derivation
                1. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - -1 \cdot \frac{x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
                2. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - -1 \cdot \frac{x}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + wj\right)} \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                3. associate-/l/N/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - -1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}} \]
                4. associate-*r/N/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}} \]
                5. lower-/.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj}} \]
                6. associate-*r/N/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot x}{e^{wj}}}}{1 + wj} \]
                7. lower-/.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot x}{e^{wj}}}}{1 + wj} \]
                8. mul-1-negN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(x\right)}}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj} \]
                9. lower-neg.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{-x}}{e^{wj}}}{1 + wj} \]
                10. lower-exp.f64N/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{-x}{\color{blue}{e^{wj}}}}{1 + wj} \]
                11. +-commutativeN/A

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{-x}{e^{wj}}}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
                12. lower-+.f6487.5

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\frac{-x}{e^{wj}}}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
              4. Applied rewrites87.5%

                \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
              5. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites87.5%

                  \[\leadsto wj - \frac{-x}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + wj\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

                if -0.00759999999999999998 < wj

                1. Initial program 76.8%

                  \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing
                3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                4. Applied rewrites99.2%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
              6. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
              7. Final simplification98.8%

                \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.0076:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{x}{\left(-1 - wj\right) \cdot e^{wj}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
              8. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 5: 96.2% accurate, 7.5× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x)
               :precision binary64
               (fma
                (fma
                 (fma 2.5 x (- 1.0 (* (fma 0.6666666666666666 x (fma 2.0 x 1.0)) wj)))
                 wj
                 (* -2.0 x))
                wj
                x))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, (1.0 - (fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, (-2.0 * x)), wj, x);
              }
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return fma(fma(fma(2.5, x, Float64(1.0 - Float64(fma(0.6666666666666666, x, fma(2.0, x, 1.0)) * wj))), wj, Float64(-2.0 * x)), wj, x)
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(2.5 * x + N[(1.0 - N[(N[(0.6666666666666666 * x + N[(2.0 * x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 75.6%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
              4. Applied rewrites96.4%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
              5. Add Preprocessing

              Alternative 6: 95.7% accurate, 15.8× speedup?

              \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right) \cdot x + wj, wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
              (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (+ (* (fma 2.5 wj -2.0) x) wj) wj x))
              double code(double wj, double x) {
              	return fma(((fma(2.5, wj, -2.0) * x) + wj), wj, x);
              }
              
              function code(wj, x)
              	return fma(Float64(Float64(fma(2.5, wj, -2.0) * x) + wj), wj, x)
              end
              
              code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(2.5 * wj + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
              
              \begin{array}{l}
              
              \\
              \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right) \cdot x + wj, wj, x\right)
              \end{array}
              
              Derivation
              1. Initial program 75.6%

                \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
              2. Add Preprocessing
              3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
              4. Applied rewrites96.4%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
              5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
              6. Step-by-step derivation
                1. Applied rewrites96.0%

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
                2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                3. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. +-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) + x} \]
                  2. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

                    \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(2\right)\right) \cdot x\right)} + x \]
                  3. metadata-evalN/A

                    \[\leadsto wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + x \]
                  4. distribute-rgt-inN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right)\right) \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj\right)} + x \]
                  5. distribute-rgt-outN/A

                    \[\leadsto \left(\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)\right) \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj\right) + x \]
                  6. *-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto \left(\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right) \cdot x}\right)\right) \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj\right) + x \]
                  7. cancel-sign-sub-invN/A

                    \[\leadsto \left(\left(wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-4 + \frac{3}{2}\right)\right)\right) \cdot x\right)}\right) \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj\right) + x \]
                  8. metadata-evalN/A

                    \[\leadsto \left(\left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{-5}{2}}\right)\right) \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj\right) + x \]
                  9. metadata-evalN/A

                    \[\leadsto \left(\left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{5}{2}} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot wj + \left(-2 \cdot x\right) \cdot wj\right) + x \]
                  10. distribute-rgt-inN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \frac{5}{2} \cdot x\right) + -2 \cdot x\right)} + x \]
                  11. +-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 + \frac{5}{2} \cdot x\right)\right)} + x \]
                  12. *-commutativeN/A

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot x + wj \cdot \left(1 + \frac{5}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot wj} + x \]
                4. Applied rewrites96.2%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj + x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                5. Final simplification96.2%

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, wj, -2\right) \cdot x + wj, wj, x\right) \]
                6. Add Preprocessing

                Alternative 7: 95.4% accurate, 22.1× speedup?

                \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \end{array} \]
                (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* (- 1.0 wj) wj) wj x))
                double code(double wj, double x) {
                	return fma(((1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x);
                }
                
                function code(wj, x)
                	return fma(Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * wj), wj, x)
                end
                
                code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj), $MachinePrecision] * wj + x), $MachinePrecision]
                
                \begin{array}{l}
                
                \\
                \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right)
                \end{array}
                
                Derivation
                1. Initial program 75.6%

                  \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                2. Add Preprocessing
                3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                4. Applied rewrites96.4%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                  \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right), wj, x\right) \]
                6. Step-by-step derivation
                  1. Applied rewrites96.0%

                    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj, wj, x\right) \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing

                  Alternative 8: 84.1% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

                  \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \end{array} \]
                  (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (fma (* x wj) -2.0 x))
                  double code(double wj, double x) {
                  	return fma((x * wj), -2.0, x);
                  }
                  
                  function code(wj, x)
                  	return fma(Float64(x * wj), -2.0, x)
                  end
                  
                  code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision] * -2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]
                  
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  
                  \\
                  \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right)
                  \end{array}
                  
                  Derivation
                  1. Initial program 75.6%

                    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing
                  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
                  4. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. +-commutativeN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x} \]
                    2. *-commutativeN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(wj \cdot x\right) \cdot -2} + x \]
                    3. lower-fma.f64N/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
                    4. lower-*.f6483.9

                      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot x}, -2, x\right) \]
                  5. Applied rewrites83.9%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(wj \cdot x, -2, x\right)} \]
                  6. Final simplification83.9%

                    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot wj, -2, x\right) \]
                  7. Add Preprocessing

                  Alternative 9: 84.1% accurate, 27.6× speedup?

                  \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]
                  (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* (fma -2.0 wj 1.0) x))
                  double code(double wj, double x) {
                  	return fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x;
                  }
                  
                  function code(wj, x)
                  	return Float64(fma(-2.0, wj, 1.0) * x)
                  end
                  
                  code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(-2.0 * wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]
                  
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  
                  \\
                  \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x
                  \end{array}
                  
                  Derivation
                  1. Initial program 75.6%

                    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing
                  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                  4. Applied rewrites96.4%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
                  6. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. associate-*r*N/A

                      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x} \]
                    2. distribute-rgt1-inN/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
                    3. lower-*.f64N/A

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot wj + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
                    4. lower-fma.f6483.9

                      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right)} \cdot x \]
                  7. Applied rewrites83.9%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, wj, 1\right) \cdot x} \]
                  8. Add Preprocessing

                  Alternative 10: 14.1% accurate, 55.2× speedup?

                  \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj \cdot wj \end{array} \]
                  (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* wj wj))
                  double code(double wj, double x) {
                  	return wj * wj;
                  }
                  
                  real(8) function code(wj, x)
                      real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                      real(8), intent (in) :: x
                      code = wj * wj
                  end function
                  
                  public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                  	return wj * wj;
                  }
                  
                  def code(wj, x):
                  	return wj * wj
                  
                  function code(wj, x)
                  	return Float64(wj * wj)
                  end
                  
                  function tmp = code(wj, x)
                  	tmp = wj * wj;
                  end
                  
                  code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj * wj), $MachinePrecision]
                  
                  \begin{array}{l}
                  
                  \\
                  wj \cdot wj
                  \end{array}
                  
                  Derivation
                  1. Initial program 75.6%

                    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                  2. Add Preprocessing
                  3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right) + \frac{2}{3} \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + \frac{3}{2} \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
                  4. Applied rewrites96.4%

                    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2.5, x, 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(0.6666666666666666, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 1\right)\right) \cdot wj\right), wj, -2 \cdot x\right), wj, x\right)} \]
                  5. Taylor expanded in x around 0

                    \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} \]
                  6. Step-by-step derivation
                    1. Applied rewrites14.9%

                      \[\leadsto \left(\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot wj\right) \cdot \color{blue}{wj} \]
                    2. Taylor expanded in wj around 0

                      \[\leadsto {wj}^{2} \]
                    3. Step-by-step derivation
                      1. Applied rewrites14.8%

                        \[\leadsto wj \cdot wj \]
                      2. Add Preprocessing

                      Alternative 11: 4.3% accurate, 82.8× speedup?

                      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - 1 \end{array} \]
                      (FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (- wj 1.0))
                      double code(double wj, double x) {
                      	return wj - 1.0;
                      }
                      
                      real(8) function code(wj, x)
                          real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                          real(8), intent (in) :: x
                          code = wj - 1.0d0
                      end function
                      
                      public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                      	return wj - 1.0;
                      }
                      
                      def code(wj, x):
                      	return wj - 1.0
                      
                      function code(wj, x)
                      	return Float64(wj - 1.0)
                      end
                      
                      function tmp = code(wj, x)
                      	tmp = wj - 1.0;
                      end
                      
                      code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]
                      
                      \begin{array}{l}
                      
                      \\
                      wj - 1
                      \end{array}
                      
                      Derivation
                      1. Initial program 75.6%

                        \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
                      2. Add Preprocessing
                      3. Taylor expanded in wj around inf

                        \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
                      4. Step-by-step derivation
                        1. Applied rewrites3.6%

                          \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{1} \]
                        2. Add Preprocessing

                        Developer Target 1: 78.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

                        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
                        (FPCore (wj x)
                         :precision binary64
                         (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
                        double code(double wj, double x) {
                        	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                        }
                        
                        real(8) function code(wj, x)
                            real(8), intent (in) :: wj
                            real(8), intent (in) :: x
                            code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
                        end function
                        
                        public static double code(double wj, double x) {
                        	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
                        }
                        
                        def code(wj, x):
                        	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
                        
                        function code(wj, x)
                        	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
                        end
                        
                        function tmp = code(wj, x)
                        	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
                        end
                        
                        code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
                        
                        \begin{array}{l}
                        
                        \\
                        wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
                        \end{array}
                        

                        Reproduce

                        ?
                        herbie shell --seed 2024243 
                        (FPCore (wj x)
                          :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
                          :precision binary64
                        
                          :alt
                          (! :herbie-platform default (let ((ew (exp wj))) (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1)) (/ x (+ ew (* wj ew)))))))
                        
                          (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))