Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.4% → 98.1%

Time: 9.2s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 1.4×

• 32.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a + x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-138}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-108}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b + \left(t \cdot a + \left(y \cdot z + x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma z y (+ (* (fma b z t) a) x))))
   (if (<= a -2e-138)
     t_1
     (if (<= a 3.1e-108) (+ (* (* z a) b) (+ (* t a) (+ (* y z) x))) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(z, y, ((fma(b, z, t) * a) + x));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2e-138) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 3.1e-108) {
		tmp = ((z * a) * b) + ((t * a) + ((y * z) + x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(z, y, Float64(Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a) + x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -2e-138)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 3.1e-108)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(z * a) * b) + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(Float64(y * z) + x)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * y + N[(N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -2e-138], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 3.1e-108], N[(N[(N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -2.00000000000000013e-138 or 3.10000000000000014e-108 < a

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      4. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      6. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      10. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      11. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + t \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

      12. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      13. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      14. associate-*l* N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

      15. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a}\right)\right) \]

      16. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

      17. distribute-lft-out N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)}\right) \]

      18. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)}\right) \]

      19. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z} + t\right)\right) \]

      20. lower-fma.f64 100.0

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000013e-138 < a < 3.10000000000000014e-108

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-138}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a + x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-108}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot a\right) \cdot b + \left(t \cdot a + \left(y \cdot z + x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b \cdot z + t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.9e+225)
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)
   (if (<= z 4e+219) (fma a (+ (* b z) t) (fma z y x)) (* (fma b a y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.9e+225) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	} else if (z <= 4e+219) {
		tmp = fma(a, ((b * z) + t), fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.9e+225)
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	elseif (z <= 4e+219)
		tmp = fma(a, Float64(Float64(b * z) + t), fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.9e+225], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 4e+219], N[(a * N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.9e225

   1. Initial program 67.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 94.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -1.9e225 < z < 3.99999999999999986e219

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-+l+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot a} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot t} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot t + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-out N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      11. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + z \cdot b, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      12. lower-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{t + z \cdot b}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      13. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      14. lower-*.f64 98.6

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      15. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      17. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + x\right) \]

      18. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      19. lower-fma.f64 98.6

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, t + b \cdot z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.99999999999999986e219 < z

   1. Initial program 79.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b \cdot z + t, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 95.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.9e+225)
   (fma (fma b a y) z x)
   (if (<= z 4e+219) (fma a (fma b z t) (fma z y x)) (* (fma b a y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.9e+225) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	} else if (z <= 4e+219) {
		tmp = fma(a, fma(b, z, t), fma(z, y, x));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.9e+225)
		tmp = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	elseif (z <= 4e+219)
		tmp = fma(a, fma(b, z, t), fma(z, y, x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.9e+225], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 4e+219], N[(a * N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.9e225

   1. Initial program 67.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 94.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -1.9e225 < z < 3.99999999999999986e219

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      3. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot a + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      8. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} + t \cdot a\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      9. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      10. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right) + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      11. distribute-lft-out N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)} + \left(x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      12. lower-fma.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, z \cdot b + t, x + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      13. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{b \cdot z} + t, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 98.6

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, x + y \cdot z\right) \]

      15. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x}\right) \]

      17. lift-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + x\right) \]

      18. *-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x\right) \]

      19. lower-fma.f64 98.6

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.99999999999999986e219 < z

   1. Initial program 79.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 62.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+140}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{-263}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot a, b, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 0.000105:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -1.65e+140)
   (fma t a x)
   (if (<= t -7.4e-263)
     (fma (* z a) b x)
     (if (<= t 0.000105) (fma z y x) (fma t a x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.65e+140) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else if (t <= -7.4e-263) {
		tmp = fma((z * a), b, x);
	} else if (t <= 0.000105) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -1.65e+140)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	elseif (t <= -7.4e-263)
		tmp = fma(Float64(z * a), b, x);
	elseif (t <= 0.000105)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[t, -1.65e+140], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, -7.4e-263], N[(N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision] * b + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 0.000105], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -1.6500000000000001e140 or 1.05e-4 < t

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 70.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   if -1.6500000000000001e140 < t < -7.3999999999999994e-263

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 88.7

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot a, \color{blue}{b}, x\right) \]

   if -7.3999999999999994e-263 < t < 1.05e-4

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 69.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 86.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+88}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (fma b a y) z x)))
   (if (<= z -1.15e+88) t_1 (if (<= z 2.35e-54) (fma (fma b z t) a x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.15e+88) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 2.35e-54) {
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.15e+88)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 2.35e-54)
		tmp = fma(fma(b, z, t), a, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.15e+88], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 2.35e-54], N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.1500000000000001e88 or 2.35e-54 < z

   1. Initial program 85.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 92.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -1.1500000000000001e88 < z < 2.35e-54

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in N/A

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} + x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t + b \cdot z, a, x\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z + t}, a, x\right) \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 89.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}, a, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right), a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 86.5% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -26500:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma (fma b a y) z x)))
   (if (<= b -26500.0) t_1 (if (<= b 9.8e+72) (fma z y (fma t a x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x);
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -26500.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (b <= 9.8e+72) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(fma(b, a, y), z, x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -26500.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (b <= 9.8e+72)
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[b, -26500.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[b, 9.8e+72], N[(z * y + N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if b < -26500 or 9.80000000000000012e72 < b

   1. Initial program 90.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + a \cdot b, z, x\right)} \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{a \cdot b + y}, z, x\right) \]

      8. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y, z, x\right) \]

      9. lower-fma.f64 83.3

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)}, z, x\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right), z, x\right)} \]

   if -26500 < b < 9.80000000000000012e72

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + a \cdot t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 93.5

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 82.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 7.6 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b z t) a)))
   (if (<= a -4.6e+129) t_1 (if (<= a 7.6e+87) (fma z y (fma t a x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -4.6e+129) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 7.6e+87) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -4.6e+129)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 7.6e+87)
		tmp = fma(z, y, fma(t, a, x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -4.6e+129], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 7.6e+87], N[(z * y + N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -4.59999999999999981e129 or 7.60000000000000022e87 < a

   1. Initial program 80.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 86.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -4.59999999999999981e129 < a < 7.60000000000000022e87

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + a \cdot t\right) + y \cdot z} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + a \cdot t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot t\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x\right) \]

      7. lower-fma.f64 84.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 73.6% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -820:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b z t) a)))
   (if (<= a -820.0) t_1 (if (<= a 1.2e+87) (fma z y x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, z, t) * a;
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -820.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 1.2e+87) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -820.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 1.2e+87)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -820.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 1.2e+87], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -820 or 1.19999999999999991e87 < a

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot a \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 80.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)} \cdot a \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a} \]

   if -820 < a < 1.19999999999999991e87

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 72.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 75.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.32 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma b a y) z)))
   (if (<= z -8.5e+25) t_1 (if (<= z 1.32e-33) (fma t a x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(b, a, y) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.5e+25) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= 1.32e-33) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(b, a, y) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8.5e+25)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= 1.32e-33)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(b * a + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -8.5e+25], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, 1.32e-33], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.5000000000000007e25 or 1.31999999999999993e-33 < z

   1. Initial program 85.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + a \cdot b\right) \cdot z} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + y\right)} \cdot z \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot a} + y\right) \cdot z \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 77.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Applied rewrites 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, a, y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -8.5000000000000007e25 < z < 1.31999999999999993e-33

   1. Initial program 97.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 74.2

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 95.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma z y (+ (* (fma b z t) a) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(z, y, ((fma(b, z, t) * a) + x));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(z, y, Float64(Float64(fma(b, z, t) * a) + x))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(z * y + N[(N[(N[(b * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.1%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   4. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

   5. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

   6. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   7. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   8. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right) \]

   9. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

   10. lower-+.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{x + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   11. +-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b + t \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

   12. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b} + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

   13. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \cdot b + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

   14. associate-*l* N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} + t \cdot a\right)\right) \]

   15. lift-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{t \cdot a}\right)\right) \]

   16. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot t}\right)\right) \]

   17. distribute-lft-out N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)}\right) \]

   18. lower-*.f64 N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b + t\right)}\right) \]

   19. *-commutative N/A

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \left(\color{blue}{b \cdot z} + t\right)\right) \]

   20. lower-fma.f64 96.1

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)}\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 96.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x + a \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 96.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(b, z, t\right) \cdot a + x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 62.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.1e+58) (fma z y x) (if (<= y 4.5e-32) (fma t a x) (fma z y x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.1e+58) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	} else if (y <= 4.5e-32) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.1e+58)
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	elseif (y <= 4.5e-32)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, y, x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.1e+58], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.5e-32], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * y + x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.1e58 or 4.50000000000000005e-32 < y

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 71.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x\right)} \]

   if -1.1e58 < y < 4.50000000000000005e-32

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 63.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 63.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 57.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.4e+97) (* y z) (if (<= y 2.2e+77) (fma t a x) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.4e+97) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 2.2e+77) {
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.4e+97)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= 2.2e+77)
		tmp = fma(t, a, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.4e+97], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 2.2e+77], N[(t * a + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.40000000000000032e97 or 2.2e77 < y

   1. Initial program 91.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 59.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -6.40000000000000032e97 < y < 2.2e77

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} + x \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 61.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 61.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+77}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, a, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 38.8% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.1e+58) (* y z) (if (<= y 4.2e-32) (* t a) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.1e+58) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-32) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.1d+58)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (y <= 4.2d-32) then
        tmp = t * a
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.1e+58) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-32) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.1e+58:
		tmp = y * z
	elif y <= 4.2e-32:
		tmp = t * a
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.1e+58)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-32)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.1e+58)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-32)
		tmp = t * a;
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.1e+58], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-32], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.1e58 or 4.1999999999999998e-32 < y

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 51.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if -1.1e58 < y < 4.1999999999999998e-32

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 36.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 36.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 28.5% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \cdot a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* t a))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return t * a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = t * a
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return t * a;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return t * a

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(t * a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = t * a;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.1%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 27.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]

5. Applied rewrites 27.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot a} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 97.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024240 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (if (< z -11820553527347888000) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 47589743188364287/1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))