Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (x + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (x + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (x + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -260:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.075:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ x z))))
   (if (<= y -260.0) t_0 (if (<= y 0.075) (+ x (* y z)) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -260.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.075) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = y * (x + z)
    if (y <= (-260.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (y <= 0.075d0) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -260.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 0.075) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = y * (x + z)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -260.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif y <= 0.075:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(x + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -260.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.075)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = y * (x + z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -260.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 0.075)
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -260.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 0.075], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -260 or 0.0749999999999999972 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 98.3

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -260 < y < 0.0749999999999999972

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 99.2

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -260:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 0.075:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.0% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-23}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-99}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* y (+ x z))))
   (if (<= y -3.8e-23) t_0 (if (<= y 2.7e-99) (fma y x x) t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = y * (x + z);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.8e-23) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (y <= 2.7e-99) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(y * Float64(x + z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.8e-23)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (y <= 2.7e-99)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -3.8e-23], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[y, 2.7e-99], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.80000000000000011e-23 or 2.7e-99 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 94.0

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -3.80000000000000011e-23 < y < 2.7e-99

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 73.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-23}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{-99}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 75.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.42 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+117}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.42e+51) (* y z) (if (<= z 1.35e+117) (fma y x x) (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.42e+51) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (z <= 1.35e+117) {
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.42e+51)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (z <= 1.35e+117)
		tmp = fma(y, x, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.42e+51], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.35e+117], N[(y * x + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.41999999999999998e51 or 1.3500000000000001e117 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 71.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.41999999999999998e51 < z < 1.3500000000000001e117

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 79.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 52.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.9e-11) (* x y) (if (<= x 8.5e+32) (* y z) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.9e-11) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 8.5e+32) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.9d-11)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 8.5d+32) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.9e-11) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 8.5e+32) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.9e-11:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 8.5e+32:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.9e-11)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 8.5e+32)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.9e-11)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 8.5e+32)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.9e-11], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 8.5e+32], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.8999999999999999e-11 or 8.4999999999999998e32 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 88.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 46.4%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -1.8999999999999999e-11 < x < 8.4999999999999998e32

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 58.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 28.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + y\right) \cdot x} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \cdot x \]

   3. distribute-lft1-in N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x + x} \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 63.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 63.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, x\right)} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 28.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024238 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))