ENA, Section 1.4, Mentioned, B

Percentage Accurate: 87.8% → 99.6%
Time: 10.6s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 1.1×

Specification

?
\[0.999 \leq x \land x \leq 1.001\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 10.0 (- 1.0 (* x x))))
double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 10.0d0 / (1.0d0 - (x * x))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
def code(x):
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))
function code(x)
	return Float64(10.0 / Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x)))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
end
code[x_] := N[(10.0 / N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 87.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ 10.0 (- 1.0 (* x x))))
double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 10.0d0 / (1.0d0 - (x * x))
end function
public static double code(double x) {
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
}
def code(x):
	return 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x))
function code(x)
	return Float64(10.0 / Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * x)))
end
function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 10.0 / (1.0 - (x * x));
end
code[x_] := N[(10.0 / N[(1.0 - N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 1.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ -10.0 (fma x x -1.0)))
double code(double x) {
	return -10.0 / fma(x, x, -1.0);
}
function code(x)
	return Float64(-10.0 / fma(x, x, -1.0))
end
code[x_] := N[(-10.0 / N[(x * x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 88.1%

    \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Applied rewrites99.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 13.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, x \cdot x, -10\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x x) 1.0) (fma (* x x) 10.0 10.0) (fma -10.0 (* x x) -10.0)))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * x) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = fma((x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(-10.0, (x * x), -10.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * x) <= 1.0)
		tmp = fma(Float64(x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
	else
		tmp = fma(-10.0, Float64(x * x), -10.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 1.0], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] * 10.0 + 10.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + -10.0), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, x \cdot x, -10\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 x x) < 1

    1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 + 10 \cdot {x}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 \cdot {x}^{2} + 10} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot 10} + 10 \]
      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{2}, 10, 10\right)} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
      5. lower-*.f6413.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites13.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)} \]

    if 1 < (*.f64 x x)

    1. Initial program 87.0%

      \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites1.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)\right)}^{-0.5}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot {x}^{2} - 10} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-negN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot {x}^{2} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(10\right)\right)} \]
      2. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto -10 \cdot {x}^{2} + \color{blue}{-10} \]
      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, {x}^{2}, -10\right)} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-10, \color{blue}{x \cdot x}, -10\right) \]
      5. lower-*.f6413.8

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(-10, \color{blue}{x \cdot x}, -10\right) \]
    6. Applied rewrites13.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-10, x \cdot x, -10\right)} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 13.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x x) 1.0) (fma (* x x) 10.0 10.0) -10.0))
double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * x) <= 1.0) {
		tmp = fma((x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * x) <= 1.0)
		tmp = fma(Float64(x * x), 10.0, 10.0);
	else
		tmp = -10.0;
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 1.0], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] * 10.0 + 10.0), $MachinePrecision], -10.0]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-10\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 x x) < 1

    1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 + 10 \cdot {x}^{2}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10 \cdot {x}^{2} + 10} \]
      2. *-commutativeN/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot 10} + 10 \]
      3. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({x}^{2}, 10, 10\right)} \]
      4. unpow2N/A

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
      5. lower-*.f6413.7

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot x}, 10, 10\right) \]
    5. Applied rewrites13.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot x, 10, 10\right)} \]

    if 1 < (*.f64 x x)

    1. Initial program 87.0%

      \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites1.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)\right)}^{-0.5}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites13.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]
    6. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
    7. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 4: 18.8% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-10}{x - 1} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ -10.0 (- x 1.0)))
    double code(double x) {
    	return -10.0 / (x - 1.0);
    }
    
    real(8) function code(x)
        real(8), intent (in) :: x
        code = (-10.0d0) / (x - 1.0d0)
    end function
    
    public static double code(double x) {
    	return -10.0 / (x - 1.0);
    }
    
    def code(x):
    	return -10.0 / (x - 1.0)
    
    function code(x)
    	return Float64(-10.0 / Float64(x - 1.0))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(x)
    	tmp = -10.0 / (x - 1.0);
    end
    
    code[x_] := N[(-10.0 / N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \frac{-10}{x - 1}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 88.1%

      \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Applied rewrites99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. lift-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-10}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}} \]
      2. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10}}}}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)} \]
      3. associate-/r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)}} \]
      4. lift-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x + -1\right)}} \]
      5. difference-of-sqr--1N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)}} \]
      6. associate-*r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{10} \cdot \left(x + 1\right)\right) \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}} \]
      7. associate-/r*N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot \left(x + 1\right)}}{x - 1}} \]
      8. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot \left(x + 1\right)}}{x - 1}} \]
      9. lower-/.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot \left(x + 1\right)}}}{x - 1} \]
      10. distribute-lft-inN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot x + \frac{-1}{10} \cdot 1}}}{x - 1} \]
      11. metadata-evalN/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{\frac{-1}{10} \cdot x + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{10}}}}{x - 1} \]
      12. lower-fma.f64N/A

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-1}{10}, x, \frac{-1}{10}\right)}}}{x - 1} \]
      13. lower--.f6499.3

        \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.1, x, -0.1\right)}}{\color{blue}{x - 1}} \]
    5. Applied rewrites99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-0.1, x, -0.1\right)}}{x - 1}} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-10}}{x - 1} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Applied rewrites18.8%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-10}}{x - 1} \]
      2. Add Preprocessing

      Alternative 5: 13.5% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;10\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (if (<= (* x x) 1.0) 10.0 -10.0))
      double code(double x) {
      	double tmp;
      	if ((x * x) <= 1.0) {
      		tmp = 10.0;
      	} else {
      		tmp = -10.0;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      real(8) function code(x)
          real(8), intent (in) :: x
          real(8) :: tmp
          if ((x * x) <= 1.0d0) then
              tmp = 10.0d0
          else
              tmp = -10.0d0
          end if
          code = tmp
      end function
      
      public static double code(double x) {
      	double tmp;
      	if ((x * x) <= 1.0) {
      		tmp = 10.0;
      	} else {
      		tmp = -10.0;
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      def code(x):
      	tmp = 0
      	if (x * x) <= 1.0:
      		tmp = 10.0
      	else:
      		tmp = -10.0
      	return tmp
      
      function code(x)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (Float64(x * x) <= 1.0)
      		tmp = 10.0;
      	else
      		tmp = -10.0;
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      function tmp_2 = code(x)
      	tmp = 0.0;
      	if ((x * x) <= 1.0)
      		tmp = 10.0;
      	else
      		tmp = -10.0;
      	end
      	tmp_2 = tmp;
      end
      
      code[x_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], 1.0], 10.0, -10.0]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x \leq 1:\\
      \;\;\;\;10\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;-10\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if (*.f64 x x) < 1

        1. Initial program 88.5%

          \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
        2. Add Preprocessing
        3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]
        4. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Applied rewrites13.5%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]

          if 1 < (*.f64 x x)

          1. Initial program 87.0%

            \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Applied rewrites1.5%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-0.1 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -1\right)\right)\right)}^{-0.5}} \]
          4. Taylor expanded in x around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]
          5. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites13.6%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10} \]
          6. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
          7. Add Preprocessing

          Alternative 6: 9.5% accurate, 20.0× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 10 \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (x) :precision binary64 10.0)
          double code(double x) {
          	return 10.0;
          }
          
          real(8) function code(x)
              real(8), intent (in) :: x
              code = 10.0d0
          end function
          
          public static double code(double x) {
          	return 10.0;
          }
          
          def code(x):
          	return 10.0
          
          function code(x)
          	return 10.0
          end
          
          function tmp = code(x)
          	tmp = 10.0;
          end
          
          code[x_] := 10.0
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          10
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Initial program 88.1%

            \[\frac{10}{1 - x \cdot x} \]
          2. Add Preprocessing
          3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]
          4. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Applied rewrites9.8%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{10} \]
            2. Add Preprocessing

            Reproduce

            ?
            herbie shell --seed 2024236 
            (FPCore (x)
              :name "ENA, Section 1.4, Mentioned, B"
              :precision binary64
              :pre (and (<= 0.999 x) (<= x 1.001))
              (/ 10.0 (- 1.0 (* x x))))