Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 5.7s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 3, y, -z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma (* x 3.0) y (- z)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma((x * 3.0), y, -z);
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(Float64(x * 3.0), y, Float64(-z))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y + (-z)), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift--.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z} \]

   2. sub-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   3. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y} + \left(\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \]

   4. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 3, y, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot 3}, y, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \]

   6. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{3 \cdot x}, y, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \]

   7. lower-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{3 \cdot x}, y, \mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)\right) \]

   8. lower-neg.f64 99.8

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot x, y, \color{blue}{-z}\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(3 \cdot x, y, -z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 3, y, -z\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 77.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_0 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (* x 3.0) y)))
   (if (<= t_0 -1e-13) t_0 (if (<= t_0 2e+27) (- z) t_0))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -1e-13) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (t_0 <= 2e+27) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (x * 3.0d0) * y
    if (t_0 <= (-1d-13)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (t_0 <= 2d+27) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= -1e-13) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (t_0 <= 2e+27) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y
	tmp = 0
	if t_0 <= -1e-13:
		tmp = t_0
	elif t_0 <= 2e+27:
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= -1e-13)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (t_0 <= 2e+27)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (x * 3.0) * y;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_0 <= -1e-13)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (t_0 <= 2e+27)
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, -1e-13], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 2e+27], (-z), t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 3 binary64)) y) < -1e-13 or 2e27 < (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 3 binary64)) y)

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 3} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 3} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot 3 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 82.1

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot 3 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right) \cdot 3} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -1e-13 < (*.f64 (*.f64 x #s(literal 3 binary64)) y) < 2e27

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)} \]

      2. lower-neg.f64 79.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x * 3.0d0) * y) - z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x * 3.0) * y) - z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 3.0) * y) - z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x * 3.0) * y) - z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 50.6% accurate, 4.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)} \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 50.2

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

5. Applied rewrites 50.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 2.3% accurate, 14.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(x \cdot 3\right) \cdot y - z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{neg}\left(z\right)} \]

   2. lower-neg.f64 50.2

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

5. Applied rewrites 50.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 2.1%

   \[\leadsto z \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(3 \cdot y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (* 3.0 y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (3.0d0 * y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (3.0 * y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(3.0 * y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (3.0 * y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(3.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024236 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (- (* x (* 3 y)) z))

  (- (* (* x 3.0) y) z))