Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.8s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

• 26.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + Float64(y * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * ((((y + z) + z) + y) + t)) + (y * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[(N[(N[(N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 5 \cdot y + \left(t + \left(\left(\left(z + y\right) + z\right) + y\right)\right) \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* 5.0 y) (* (+ t (+ (+ (+ z y) z) y)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (5.0 * y) + ((t + (((z + y) + z) + y)) * x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (5.0d0 * y) + ((t + (((z + y) + z) + y)) * x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (5.0 * y) + ((t + (((z + y) + z) + y)) * x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (5.0 * y) + ((t + (((z + y) + z) + y)) * x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(5.0 * y) + Float64(Float64(t + Float64(Float64(Float64(z + y) + z) + y)) * x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (5.0 * y) + ((t + (((z + y) + z) + y)) * x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t + N[(N[(N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 5 \cdot y + \left(t + \left(\left(\left(z + y\right) + z\right) + y\right)\right) \cdot x \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.2:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma 2.0 y t) x)))
   (if (<= x -1.55e-28)
     t_1
     (if (<= x 8.2) (* 5.0 y) (if (<= x 1.4e+58) (* (+ z z) x) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma(2.0, y, t) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.55e-28) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 8.2) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else if (x <= 1.4e+58) {
		tmp = (z + z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(2.0, y, t) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.55e-28)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 8.2)
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	elseif (x <= 1.4e+58)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z + z) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 * y + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.55e-28], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 8.2], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.4e+58], N[(N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.54999999999999996e-28 or 1.3999999999999999e58 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

      8. lower-+.f64 98.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right) \cdot x \]

   if -1.54999999999999996e-28 < x < 8.1999999999999993

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 54.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]

   if 8.1999999999999993 < x < 1.3999999999999999e58

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 69.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-28}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.2:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+58}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.5:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma (+ z y) 2.0 t) x)))
   (if (<= x -2.5) t_1 (if (<= x 2.5) (fma y 5.0 (* (fma 2.0 z t) x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma((z + y), 2.0, t) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.5) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 2.5) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, (fma(2.0, z, t) * x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(Float64(z + y), 2.0, t) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.5)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 2.5)
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(fma(2.0, z, t) * x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0 + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -2.5], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 2.5], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(N[(2.0 * z + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.5 or 2.5 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

      8. lower-+.f64 98.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -2.5 < x < 2.5

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)\right)} \]

      5. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      7. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x}\right) \]

      8. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

      9. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      10. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right)} + y\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      11. associate-+l+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + z\right) + \left(z + y\right)\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      13. lift-+.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(y + z\right)}\right) + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      14. flip-+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\left(y + z\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right) - \left(y + z\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)}{\left(y + z\right) - \left(y + z\right)}} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      15. +-inverses N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\frac{\color{blue}{0}}{\left(y + z\right) - \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      16. +-inverses N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot z - z \cdot z}}{\left(y + z\right) - \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      17. +-inverses N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\frac{z \cdot z - z \cdot z}{\color{blue}{0}} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      18. +-inverses N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\frac{z \cdot z - z \cdot z}{\color{blue}{z - z}} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      19. flip-+ N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{\left(z + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      20. count-2 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot z} + t\right) \cdot x\right) \]

      21. lower-fma.f64 99.4

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right)} \cdot x\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, \mathsf{fma}\left(2, z, t\right) \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 0.00156:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, t \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma (+ z y) 2.0 t) x)))
   (if (<= x -1.3e-101) t_1 (if (<= x 0.00156) (fma y 5.0 (* t x)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma((z + y), 2.0, t) * x;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.3e-101) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 0.00156) {
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, (t * x));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(Float64(z + y), 2.0, t) * x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.3e-101)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 0.00156)
		tmp = fma(y, 5.0, Float64(t * x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0 + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -1.3e-101], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 0.00156], N[(y * 5.0 + N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.3000000000000001e-101 or 0.00155999999999999997 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

      8. lower-+.f64 95.1

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x} \]

   if -1.3000000000000001e-101 < x < 0.00155999999999999997

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} + y \cdot 5 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 79.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} + y \cdot 5 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} + y \cdot 5 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x + y \cdot 5} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5 + t \cdot x} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} + t \cdot x \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 79.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, t \cdot x\right)} \]

   7. Applied rewrites 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, x \cdot t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{-101}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 0.00156:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 5, t \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 40.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5.4e+100)
   (* (* 2.0 y) x)
   (if (<= y -4.7e+14) (* (+ z z) x) (if (<= y 6.8e+21) (* t x) (* 5.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.4e+100) {
		tmp = (2.0 * y) * x;
	} else if (y <= -4.7e+14) {
		tmp = (z + z) * x;
	} else if (y <= 6.8e+21) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5.4d+100)) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 * y) * x
    else if (y <= (-4.7d+14)) then
        tmp = (z + z) * x
    else if (y <= 6.8d+21) then
        tmp = t * x
    else
        tmp = 5.0d0 * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.4e+100) {
		tmp = (2.0 * y) * x;
	} else if (y <= -4.7e+14) {
		tmp = (z + z) * x;
	} else if (y <= 6.8e+21) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5.4e+100:
		tmp = (2.0 * y) * x
	elif y <= -4.7e+14:
		tmp = (z + z) * x
	elif y <= 6.8e+21:
		tmp = t * x
	else:
		tmp = 5.0 * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.4e+100)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 * y) * x);
	elseif (y <= -4.7e+14)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z + z) * x);
	elseif (y <= 6.8e+21)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5.4e+100)
		tmp = (2.0 * y) * x;
	elseif (y <= -4.7e+14)
		tmp = (z + z) * x;
	elseif (y <= 6.8e+21)
		tmp = t * x;
	else
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5.4e+100], N[(N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -4.7e+14], N[(N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 6.8e+21], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if y < -5.39999999999999997e100

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

      8. lower-+.f64 74.6

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 74.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]

   if -5.39999999999999997e100 < y < -4.7e14

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 45.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -4.7e14 < y < 6.8e21

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 50.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if 6.8e21 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 53.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 78.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma 2.0 x 5.0) y)))
   (if (<= y -5.2e+100) t_1 (if (<= y 7e+21) (* (fma z 2.0 t) x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.2e+100) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 7e+21) {
		tmp = fma(z, 2.0, t) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.2e+100)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 7e+21)
		tmp = Float64(fma(z, 2.0, t) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 * x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -5.2e+100], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 7e+21], N[(N[(z * 2.0 + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.2000000000000003e100 or 7e21 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + 5\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right)} \cdot x + 5\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right)} + 5\right) \]

      4. neg-sub0 N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - -2 \cdot x\right)} + 5\right) \]

      5. associate--r- N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)} \]

      6. neg-sub0 N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)\right) \cdot y} \]

      8. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)\right) \cdot y} \]

      9. neg-sub0 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)} \cdot y \]

      10. associate--r- N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - -2 \cdot x\right) + 5\right)} \cdot y \]

      11. neg-sub0 N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right)} + 5\right) \cdot y \]

      12. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right) \cdot x} + 5\right) \cdot y \]

      13. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot x + 5\right) \cdot y \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 89.2

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -5.2000000000000003e100 < y < 7e21

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + 2 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + 2 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      5. lower-fma.f64 80.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, t\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 80.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 2, t\right) \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 60.3% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.16 \cdot 10^{+17}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+21}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (fma 2.0 x 5.0) y)))
   (if (<= y -1.16e+17) t_1 (if (<= y 6.8e+21) (* (fma 2.0 y t) x) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.16e+17) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 6.8e+21) {
		tmp = fma(2.0, y, t) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(fma(2.0, x, 5.0) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.16e+17)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 6.8e+21)
		tmp = Float64(fma(2.0, y, t) * x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 * x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -1.16e+17], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 6.8e+21], N[(N[(2.0 * y + t), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.16e17 or 6.8e21 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(5 + 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot x + 5\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right)} \cdot x + 5\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right)} + 5\right) \]

      4. neg-sub0 N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - -2 \cdot x\right)} + 5\right) \]

      5. associate--r- N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)} \]

      6. neg-sub0 N/A

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)\right) \cdot y} \]

      8. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(\left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)\right) \cdot y} \]

      9. neg-sub0 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(-2 \cdot x - 5\right)\right)} \cdot y \]

      10. associate--r- N/A

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - -2 \cdot x\right) + 5\right)} \cdot y \]

      11. neg-sub0 N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2 \cdot x\right)\right)} + 5\right) \cdot y \]

      12. distribute-lft-neg-in N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{neg}\left(-2\right)\right) \cdot x} + 5\right) \cdot y \]

      13. metadata-eval N/A

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{2} \cdot x + 5\right) \cdot y \]

      14. lower-fma.f64 81.7

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, x, 5\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -1.16e17 < y < 6.8e21

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot x} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot y + 2 \cdot z\right) + t\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. distribute-lft-out N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      5. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot 2} + t\right) \cdot x \]

      6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y + z, 2, t\right)} \cdot x \]

      7. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

      8. lower-+.f64 87.2

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + y}, 2, t\right) \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + y, 2, t\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \left(t + 2 \cdot y\right) \cdot x \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

   8. Applied rewrites 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, t\right) \cdot x \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 47.2% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -7.4 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 18500000:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z + z\right) \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -7.4e+87) (* t x) (if (<= t 18500000.0) (* (+ z z) x) (* t x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -7.4e+87) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (t <= 18500000.0) {
		tmp = (z + z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-7.4d+87)) then
        tmp = t * x
    else if (t <= 18500000.0d0) then
        tmp = (z + z) * x
    else
        tmp = t * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -7.4e+87) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (t <= 18500000.0) {
		tmp = (z + z) * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -7.4e+87:
		tmp = t * x
	elif t <= 18500000.0:
		tmp = (z + z) * x
	else:
		tmp = t * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -7.4e+87)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	elseif (t <= 18500000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z + z) * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -7.4e+87)
		tmp = t * x;
	elseif (t <= 18500000.0)
		tmp = (z + z) * x;
	else
		tmp = t * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -7.4e+87], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 18500000.0], N[(N[(z + z), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -7.40000000000000005e87 or 1.85e7 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 65.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 65.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -7.40000000000000005e87 < t < 1.85e7

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot 2} \]

      3. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

      4. lower-*.f64 38.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right)} \cdot 2 \]

   5. Applied rewrites 38.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 38.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(z + z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 46.4% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.45e-41) (* t x) (if (<= x 8.6e+24) (* 5.0 y) (* t x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.45e-41) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (x <= 8.6e+24) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.45d-41)) then
        tmp = t * x
    else if (x <= 8.6d+24) then
        tmp = 5.0d0 * y
    else
        tmp = t * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.45e-41) {
		tmp = t * x;
	} else if (x <= 8.6e+24) {
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.45e-41:
		tmp = t * x
	elif x <= 8.6e+24:
		tmp = 5.0 * y
	else:
		tmp = t * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.45e-41)
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	elseif (x <= 8.6e+24)
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.45e-41)
		tmp = t * x;
	elseif (x <= 8.6e+24)
		tmp = 5.0 * y;
	else
		tmp = t * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.45e-41], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 8.6e+24], N[(5.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.44999999999999989e-41 or 8.59999999999999975e24 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 45.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 45.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

   if -1.44999999999999989e-41 < x < 8.59999999999999975e24

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 53.4

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 53.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.45 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 30.7% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* t x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(y + z\right) + z\right) + y\right) + t\right) + y \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 35.3

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]

5. Applied rewrites 35.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024235 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (+ (+ (+ (+ y z) z) y) t)) (* y 5.0)))