Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 5.3s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.3×

• 28.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right), y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (fma y x z) y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(fma(y, x, z), y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(fma(y, x, z), y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * x + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t} \]

   2. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y} + t \]

   3. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot y + z, y, t\right)} \]

   4. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y + z}, y, t\right) \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z, y, t\right) \]

   6. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + z, y, t\right) \]

   7. lower-fma.f64 100.0

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right)}, y, t\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x, z\right), y, t\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 90.3% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y\\ t_2 := \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+124}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+95}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (+ (* x y) z) y)) (t_2 (* (fma x y z) y)))
   (if (<= t_1 -5e+124) t_2 (if (<= t_1 5e+95) (fma z y t) t_2))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + z) * y;
	double t_2 = fma(x, y, z) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -5e+124) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 <= 5e+95) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y)
	t_2 = Float64(fma(x, y, z) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -5e+124)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 <= 5e+95)
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -5e+124], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e+95], N[(z * y + t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < -4.9999999999999996e124 or 5.00000000000000025e95 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot y\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + x \cdot y\right) \cdot y} \]

      3. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z\right)} \cdot y \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 94.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right)} \cdot y \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right) \cdot y} \]

   if -4.9999999999999996e124 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < 5.00000000000000025e95

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + t \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 94.8

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 80.5% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y\\ t_2 := \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+190}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+272}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (+ (* x y) z) y)) (t_2 (* (* x y) y)))
   (if (<= t_1 -2e+190) t_2 (if (<= t_1 1e+272) (fma z y t) t_2))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = ((x * y) + z) * y;
	double t_2 = (x * y) * y;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -2e+190) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+272) {
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y)
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) * y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= -2e+190)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+272)
		tmp = fma(z, y, t);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, -2e+190], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+272], N[(z * y + t), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < -2.0000000000000001e190 or 1.0000000000000001e272 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot {y}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2} \cdot x} \]

      3. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

      4. lower-*.f64 82.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Applied rewrites 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right) \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

   7. Applied rewrites 86.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{y} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e190 < (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) z) y) < 1.0000000000000001e272

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

      2. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + t \]

      3. lower-fma.f64 88.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 65.6% accurate, 2.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma z y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(z, y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(z, y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + t} \]

   2. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} + t \]

   3. lower-fma.f64 66.0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]

5. Applied rewrites 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, t\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 29.4% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (* z y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = z * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return z * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return z * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(z * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = z * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 25.1

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

5. Applied rewrites 25.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024235 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))