Examples.Basics.ProofTests:f4 from sbv-4.4

Percentage Accurate: 93.8% → 99.9%

Time: 4.1s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 1.1×

• 42.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x x) (* (* x 2.0) y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0d0) * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x x) (* (* x 2.0) y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0d0) * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = ((x * x) + ((x * 2.0) * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+148}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, x\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.3e+148) (fma y y (* x (fma 2.0 y x))) (* y y)))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.3e+148) {
		tmp = fma(y, y, (x * fma(2.0, y, x)));
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.3e+148)
		tmp = fma(y, y, Float64(x * fma(2.0, y, x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.3e+148], N[(y * y + N[(x * N[(2.0 * y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.3000000000000001e148

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y + \left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) \]

      4. lower-fma.f64 96.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

      5. lift-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, \color{blue}{x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      6. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, \color{blue}{x \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) \]

      7. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y}\right) \]

      8. lift-*.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2\right)} \cdot y\right) \]

      9. associate-*l* N/A

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot x + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-out N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + 2 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      11. lower-*.f64 N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + 2 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

      12. +-commutative N/A

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot y + x\right)}\right) \]

      13. lower-fma.f64 98.6

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, x\right)}\right) \]

   4. Applied rewrites 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, y, x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(2, y, x\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.3000000000000001e148 < y

   1. Initial program 83.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 100.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.5% accurate, 2.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-94}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.95e-94) (* x x) (* y y)))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.95e-94) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.95d-94) then
        tmp = x * x
    else
        tmp = y * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.95e-94) {
		tmp = x * x;
	} else {
		tmp = y * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.95e-94:
		tmp = x * x
	else:
		tmp = y * y
	return tmp

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.95e-94)
		tmp = Float64(x * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.95e-94)
		tmp = x * x;
	else
		tmp = y * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.95e-94], N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.9500000000000001e-94

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 70.6

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   if 1.9500000000000001e-94 < y

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{y}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 81.3

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 81.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 56.9% accurate, 4.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y])\\ \\ x \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x x))

C

assert(x < y);
double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * x;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * x
end function

Java

assert x < y;
public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * x;
}

Python

[x, y] = sort([x, y])
def code(x, y):
	return x * x

Julia

x, y = sort([x, y])
function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * x)
end

MATLAB

x, y = num2cell(sort([x, y])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * x;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x and y should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_] := N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot x + \left(x \cdot 2\right) \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

   2. lower-*.f64 58.9

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]

5. Applied rewrites 58.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 93.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot y + \left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (+ (* x x) (+ (* y y) (* (* x y) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0))

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) + Float64(Float64(y * y) + Float64(Float64(x * y) * 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (x * x) + ((y * y) + ((x * y) * 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024233 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Examples.Basics.ProofTests:f4 from sbv-4.4"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (* x x) (+ (* y y) (* (* x y) 2))))

  (+ (+ (* x x) (* (* x 2.0) y)) (* y y)))