expq3 (problem 3.4.2)

Percentage Accurate: 0.0% → 100.0%

Time: 27.9s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 29.1×

Specification

\[\left(\left|a\right| \leq 710 \land \left|b\right| \leq 710\right) \land \left(10^{-27} \cdot \mathsf{min}\left(\left|a\right|, \left|b\right|\right) \leq \varepsilon \land \varepsilon \leq \mathsf{min}\left(\left|a\right|, \left|b\right|\right)\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 0.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 13.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / b) + (1.0d0 / a)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 0.0%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in eps around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

   2. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{a \cdot b} \]

   3. lower-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{a \cdot b} \]

   4. *-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \frac{b + a}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]

   5. lower-*.f64 64.4

      \[\leadsto \frac{b + a}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 64.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + a}{b \cdot a}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

7. Applied rewrites 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{b} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 58.6% accurate, 13.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{-240}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -4.5e-135)
   (/ (+ a b) (* a b))
   (if (<= a -2.25e-240) (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a))))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -4.5e-135) {
		tmp = (a + b) / (a * b);
	} else if (a <= -2.25e-240) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-4.5d-135)) then
        tmp = (a + b) / (a * b)
    else if (a <= (-2.25d-240)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -4.5e-135) {
		tmp = (a + b) / (a * b);
	} else if (a <= -2.25e-240) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -4.5e-135:
		tmp = (a + b) / (a * b)
	elif a <= -2.25e-240:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -4.5e-135)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a + b) / Float64(a * b));
	elseif (a <= -2.25e-240)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -4.5e-135)
		tmp = (a + b) / (a * b);
	elseif (a <= -2.25e-240)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[a, -4.5e-135], N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -2.25e-240], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -4.49999999999999987e-135

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in eps around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]

      2. +-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{a \cdot b} \]

      3. lower-+.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{b + a}}{a \cdot b} \]

      4. *-commutative N/A

         \[\leadsto \frac{b + a}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]

      5. lower-*.f64 89.2

         \[\leadsto \frac{b + a}{\color{blue}{b \cdot a}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{b + a}{b \cdot a}} \]

   if -4.49999999999999987e-135 < a < -2.2500000000000001e-240

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 48.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if -2.2500000000000001e-240 < a

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 51.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{-240}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 13.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1 + \frac{b}{a}}{b} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ (+ 1.0 (/ b a)) b))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 + (b / a)) / b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 + (b / a)) / b
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 + (b / a)) / b;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 + (b / a)) / b

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(b / a)) / b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 + (b / a)) / b;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 + N[(b / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 0.0%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + a \cdot \left(\frac{\varepsilon \cdot e^{b \cdot \varepsilon}}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \varepsilon\right)}{a}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + a \cdot \left(\frac{\varepsilon \cdot e^{b \cdot \varepsilon}}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \varepsilon\right)}{a}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 43.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \varepsilon \cdot \left(\frac{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)} + -0.5\right), 1\right)}{a}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in b around 0

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \frac{b}{a}}{\color{blue}{b}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

8. Applied rewrites 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \frac{b}{a}}{\color{blue}{b}} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 56.3% accurate, 19.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{-240}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -2.25e-240) (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.25e-240) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-2.25d-240)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.25e-240) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -2.25e-240:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -2.25e-240)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -2.25e-240)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[a, -2.25e-240], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -2.2500000000000001e-240

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in b around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 67.5

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

   if -2.2500000000000001e-240 < a

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-/.f64 51.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 49.7% accurate, 29.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 a))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = 1.0d0 / a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return 1.0 / a

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(1.0 / a)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 1.0 / a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 0.0%

   \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-/.f64 43.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]

5. Applied rewrites 43.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer Target 1: 100.0% accurate, 13.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 a) (/ 1.0 b)))

C

double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / a) + (1.0d0 / b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
}

Python

def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b)

Julia

function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(1.0 / b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / a) + (1.0 / b);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024233 
(FPCore (a b eps)
  :name "expq3 (problem 3.4.2)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (<= (fabs a) 710.0) (<= (fabs b) 710.0)) (and (<= (* 1e-27 (fmin (fabs a) (fabs b))) eps) (<= eps (fmin (fabs a) (fabs b)))))

  :alt
  (! :herbie-platform default (+ (/ 1 a) (/ 1 b)))

  (/ (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0)) (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))