Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 97.6% → 98.8%

Time: 5.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.2×

• 32.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, a \cdot b\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (fma z t (fma x y (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return fma(z, t, fma(x, y, (a * b)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return fma(z, t, fma(x, y, Float64(a * b)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(z * t + N[(x * y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.2%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b} \]

   2. lift-+.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   3. +-commutative N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} + a \cdot b \]

   4. associate-+l+ N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   5. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right) \]

   6. lower-fma.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, x \cdot y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. lift-*.f64 N/A

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + a \cdot b\right) \]

   8. lower-fma.f64 99.2

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

4. Applied rewrites 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, a \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+61}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma a b (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* a b) -2e+61) t_1 (if (<= (* a b) 2e+51) (fma t z (* x y)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(a, b, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -2e+61) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 2e+51) {
		tmp = fma(t, z, (x * y));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(a, b, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -2e+61)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 2e+51)
		tmp = fma(t, z, Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * b + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -2e+61], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 2e+51], N[(t * z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -1.9999999999999999e61 or 2e51 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 86.4

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e61 < (*.f64 a b) < 2e51

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 92.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(t, z, x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 84.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (fma a b (* x y))))
   (if (<= (* x y) -2.2e+153)
     t_1
     (if (<= (* x y) 1.16e+113) (fma a b (* z t)) t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = fma(a, b, (x * y));
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -2.2e+153) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1.16e+113) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = fma(a, b, Float64(x * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -2.2e+153)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1.16e+113)
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * b + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2.2e+153], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1.16e+113], N[(a * b + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -2.2e153 or 1.1600000000000001e113 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 91.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 91.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{x \cdot y}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -2.2e153 < (*.f64 x y) < 1.1600000000000001e113

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 88.0

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{+113}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 80.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -9.5e+158)
   (* x y)
   (if (<= (* x y) 3.6e+180) (fma a b (* z t)) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -9.5e+158) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if ((x * y) <= 3.6e+180) {
		tmp = fma(a, b, (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = x * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -9.5e+158)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 3.6e+180)
		tmp = fma(a, b, Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -9.5e+158], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 3.6e+180], N[(a * b + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -9.49999999999999913e158 or 3.6000000000000002e180 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 85.0

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -9.49999999999999913e158 < (*.f64 x y) < 3.6000000000000002e180

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-fma.f64 N/A

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. lower-*.f64 86.9

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{t \cdot z}\right) \]

   5. Applied rewrites 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+180}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 54.7% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* a b) -9e+59) (* a b) (if (<= (* a b) 5.4e+51) (* z t) (* a b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -9e+59) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5.4e+51) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a * b) <= (-9d+59)) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if ((a * b) <= 5.4d+51) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a * b) <= -9e+59) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if ((a * b) <= 5.4e+51) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a * b) <= -9e+59:
		tmp = a * b
	elif (a * b) <= 5.4e+51:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(a * b) <= -9e+59)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (Float64(a * b) <= 5.4e+51)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a * b) <= -9e+59)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif ((a * b) <= 5.4e+51)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], -9e+59], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], 5.4e+51], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 a b) < -8.99999999999999919e59 or 5.39999999999999983e51 < (*.f64 a b)

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 68.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 68.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if -8.99999999999999919e59 < (*.f64 a b) < 5.39999999999999983e51

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. lower-*.f64 54.9

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   5. Applied rewrites 54.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \cdot b \leq -9 \cdot 10^{+59}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \cdot b \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+51}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 34.9% accurate, 3.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.2%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. lower-*.f64 35.5

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

5. Applied rewrites 35.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024232 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Linear.V3:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)))